JackNYC

No problem, my mission is to help others to pay closer attention. I was just too lazy to find, copy, and paste the link again. I hope that clicking on “previous page” wasn´t too labor-intensive for you. 😆

Getting someone who checks all of your boxes and is willing to travel to Jersey City might be difficult, especially with a table.  You would likely have to pay for time spent traveling, fund car transportation if they’re traveling with a table, and also guarantee enough of a time commitment to make it worth somebody’s while. I’m not saying this to be negative, but rather to set realistic expectations.  You’ll likely have a lot more options if you head into nyc and make a day of it.

someone needs a hobby. 

"Info on this hot one?"
Constructive feedback -- vague topic titles like this are not helpful. 
It is preferable to at least include the provider's profile name and the city where they are based in the title.
"Info on Vicnt in Chicago?" would save time by allowing users with no info on Chicago providers to pass over the the topic.

I’ve heard he’s on the short-list for a Nobel Peace Prize for his humanitarian efforts in the Sudan.

That seems a little harsh. Most masseurs in NYC with tables either don’t travel at all or don’t travel with a table. Besides the fact that tables are cumbersome, masseurs have no idea if a client lives in a walk-up or a doorman building - either one can be an issue with a table.  Vlad is strictly outcall, so he could presumably rent space for a session on 14th if a table is that big of a deal. 
 
 

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

Again, that’s not what it’s about.  Not a single person has blamed P_A for preferences or market dynamics. And unless I’m missing something, nobody has expressed any neediness or victim mentality.  People are just trying to call out and hopefully reduce some lame, immature troll-like behavior.  Anyway, this is just a circular conversation at this point, so I’m out. ✌️ 

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

Burn this thread down.  public assistance and Pile Driver just keep repeating themselves.  Pizza?

you haven't read the entire thread 

We're not Karen's. You took the thread off track.

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

Again, that’s not what it’s about.  Not a single person has blamed P_A for preferences or market dynamics. And unless I’m missing something, nobody has expressed any neediness or victim mentality.  People are just trying to call out and hopefully reduce some lame, immature troll-like behavior.  Anyway, this is just a circular conversation at this point, so I’m out. ✌️ 

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

" ... yucked somebody's yum ...".  I've never heard that expression before.   It reminds me of someone eating something that they like that I may not particularly like.  On the erotic end of things, can 'cum' be involved?  I digress.

you haven't even read the entire thread correctly

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

Again, that’s not what it’s about.  Not a single person has blamed P_A for preferences or market dynamics. And unless I’m missing something, nobody has expressed any neediness or victim mentality.  People are just trying to call out and hopefully reduce some lame, immature troll-like behavior.  Anyway, this is just a circular conversation at this point, so I’m out. ✌️ 

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

Again, that’s not what it’s about.  Not a single person has blamed P_A for preferences or market dynamics. And unless I’m missing something, nobody has expressed any neediness or victim mentality.  People are just trying to call out and hopefully reduce some lame, immature troll-like behavior.  Anyway, this is just a circular conversation at this point, so I’m out. ✌️ 

Again, that’s not what it’s about.  Not a single person has blamed P_A for preferences or market dynamics. And unless I’m missing something, nobody has expressed any neediness or victim mentality.  People are just trying to call out and hopefully reduce some lame, immature troll-like behavior.  Anyway, this is just a circular conversation at this point, so I’m out. ✌️ 

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum. 

No, that’s not what happened or why people are upset. The fact that older masseurs are not part of the standard business massage parlor model was actually acknowledged by the original poster which is why he was asking for some exceptions that may have some older masseurs on staff. 
You replied with a crass restaurant analogy that was basically a false equivalency; nobody wants old food and clearly many people reading the forum prefer older masseurs for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether or not you think it’s a fetish.  Then you doubled down with more immature, inflammatory comments (“stale bread” “old-man fetish” etc), and insisted you that all you did was state a “FACT.”
To put it more simply, you yucked somebody’s yum, and that’s just lame, unproductive, and not in the spirit of the forum.