Tarte Gogo

Errr, this thread was about the Pavlov’s dog effect, not the availabiliy of the $5 bills.

That’s if he has time to even get to your text or email. Between time with clients, at the gym, and in shops spending all this money, I would be surprised if his phone didn’t look like this:

We could learn some Portuguese to fix that. The price, however is a total no go.

I think he has too many clients. Can’t handle the volume of requests. So, no point answering if he won’t have the time to see you anyway.

lol, me too. I am not sure what is happening in @Smurof ’s head while he is writing, but either 1. he thinks faster than he writes, and as a consequence he omits to write part of the thinking, or 2. there is a real organisation issue in there. I am guessing 1.

@Dtnow how did it go? Did you try to go to any of the brothels?

If you want to say no, hmm, hard one. I would just leave it there. If he insists on an answer, say that the radical change of price makes you feel that the escort doesn’t seem to understand the prices in the US market. I think it is respectful to say that because it is factual and honest. If you want to say yes, just say, “Sure, that price is more in line to what I was expecting, when are you free?”

You are being facetious. You know very well that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about publicly available information about a porn star that he advertises himself because it is beneficial to his business, not a private Facebook page. For example I had a strike in this exact post: https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/411-justin_teen-nyc.122339/page-6#post-1353852 because I put the link to an onlyfans.com page, that the escort has himself put in his rentmen ad. That was the most ridiculous application of the rules that I have seen. Basically I was told "You cannot repeat what the escort says publicly on his rentmen page". Pfff.

I agree, Sniper's #5 is a good one. Maybe that is what is happening here: suddenly free, needs to fill that time.

Let's list them: 1. The escort doesn't know what the market is, and therefore is inexperienced. Lack of experience could result in bad sex. 2. The escort is trying to squeeze dollars from you even though he knows he is not worth that. That is borderline dishonest. 3. The escort is worth (on the market) the price quoted initially, but is really desperate. That means he cannot manage his cash flow and even though he makes a lot usually, he cannot pay the rent because he spent it all on non-essentials. That to me is not great but does not mean the encounter will be bad. 4. Or even worse, he is desperate because he need a drug fix urgently, and tries to get hired in any way to pay for it. Any other reason you guys can think of?

I disagree with that part of the TOS, whether it was used in this particular case or not. I have not seen the posts before they were edited by the admins, but the reason they give and what remains of the posts seems to indicate that is what happened.

Exactly. You don’t even get a PM to say “stop doing this or you will be suspended. But I am even more annoyed by the stupidity of one of rules in the rule book, which I think was used here to suspend him. “Don’t post a link to a PUBLICLY available website that ANYONE can see, even if the porn star himself advertises it” .

Pfff. I can’t have any respect for that. Seriously, pfff.

Now I have to try that WickedBoy!

Is @Avalon suspended because of this? I was getting worried he might have some real life troubles of one kind or another.

No, they have my google phone number, from which they cannot find anything unless they work for Google and break a whole series of rules.

If I am going to criticise an escort, I am not planning to ever see that escort again. So why should I care that the escort knows if I didn’t enjoy the encounter? Share away my PMs, I won’t worry about it.

In most of my recent life, withdrawing a lot of cash from an ATM means I am going to get sex pretty soon. I feel like Pavlov’s dog effect is operating on me: I now feel exited when withdrawing cash at the ATM, even though I am not intending to use that cash to pay an escort. Anyone else feels this?

Actually, the only measure that exists in any serious sociology papers on the subject is self-identification. If you identify as gay, you are gay, if you identify as straight you are straight. Any attempt to use other measures (like number of people of the same sex you fucked) falls under heavy criticism, as there are in reality as many categories as there are human being, and there are gay virgins etc. So the only solution that is both practical and ethical, is to use self-identification.

Merry Christmas, everyone.

Hmm, I only feel qualified if money is involved and usually I go for short sessions. I'll let others give you advice, then.

Lol! And you wonder why escorts complain about our never ending back and forth texting!

Lol. Is this 3rd level humour? Or didn’t you get the second level humour from @Boy4 ? Or was @Boy4 not joking? Now I am unsure of anything.... arrggg!

If you paste some links to your preferred guys, we can do some research for you also.

I agree with @julius for my first, I wouldn’t want a very hot guy that has a chance of having a rubbish attitude. Once you found some guys that you like, check your choices for reviews on https://www.daddysreviews.com/ An independent review site is much better than rentmen reviews, because on rentmen, the escort is allowed to delete bad reviews. Not here, they only have a right to answer bad reviews.