spkr100

@honcho is indeed correct. I am really not overly into Bondage now as to me it is a waste of valuable time where one can begin the torture which to me is the main event. However, I have experienced enough over the years to know what works best.
 
Ironically I was only handcuffed with actual police metal cuffs once. To further add it the irony, it was done in jest by a friend who was the only female police officer in town at the time and I found the metal cuffs to be quite uncomfortable and confining as indeed they are intended to be.
 
Rope can also be overly uncomfortable as it can cause a burning sensation. It may seem strange to some, but where Bondage is concerned it important for the victim to be reasonably comfortable and in a safe position. One must also be bound in a safe manner such that one would not be able to slip, slide, and be injured in the process. That is one reason why I never really got involved in the tying up aspect of it all. Plus I was never good with rope and knots etc.
 
Consequently, leather restraints or those made of a soft material and fastened with Velcro™ are the easiest not only to work with, but the kindest to the victim, and the kinder one is to the sub the longer he can enjoy the pleasures of Bondage if that is in fact what he enjoys most.

Call me cheap, but $200 is as high as I would go for anyone.

I have several times, but it's been with guys not considered pros. Hot craigslist finds searching for women in casual encounters, a personal trainer once, a mostly straight bartender another time. I wouldn't pay it for a pro. If I'm paying that much I want low mileage and the thrill of opening one's mind for the right price Oh, and many of those were negotiated for an hour, but ended up staying much longer and doing an unexpected extra round or two

The prices for escorts (as determined by doing searches on RM) are creeping up. However, $200/hr seems to be the going rate with some slightly above. For all of us who hire escorts, I think it is bad practice that many of us would pay more.It will only serve to up the market rate.
I also can't tolerate escorts coming to Canada and advertising in US dollars. Some Canadian escorts are now advertising in US currency. True professionals like Eric Hassan charge in local currency.

You do know this is porn? Fantasy? and that they are acting? I mean admittedly not Oscar winning performances from the method school, but part of the Sean Cody/CF shtick is to portray these guys as if they are really straight and are forced to do this for cash, as that fulfills a lot of guys porn fantasies. I am well aware that some of them may indeed by Gay for pay, but the assumption that they are in real life exactly as you see on video is exactly that, an assumption.

Hey, at $6000 an hour, he needs to be a good boy and do as he is told!

The two are not mutually exclusive.

Because a higher price does not always equal a stellar experience no matter "hot" the guy looks.

Sex on a budget does not allow such extravagances and if I could spare the cash, I would opt for a three way or 2 hours with someone else.

I think you are generalizing a bit here but you do have some valid points. I think it is also important to note where the SB is located. Living on a ranch in the southwest I find that a lot of young men use it to find a local "daddy" because there is nothing available on the other online or app sites. SA mostly has decent Sugar Daddies. I think the big cities are a far different case. Everything online takes weeding out the bad boys...dating sites, escort sites, massage sites, sex apps......it takes time and some experience. Sometimes it is worth it. I do miss the days where you could only meet guys at a gay bar or event.

I've had my "Sugar Baby" living with me for over two months. Lovely young man, who had been abandoned by his conservative Catholic family for being gay. He's been a rewarding addition to my home life. Couldn't be more pleased at my decision to welcome him into my life.

Being a SD requires deep pockets for wooing the sugar baby: clothes, exotic trips, restaurants. After doing it for 3 years and having successfully sent off the graduate to another state, i think i much prefer the hourly appointments where the only expectation is companionship/sex. I can't tell you how many fancy jockstraps, Hermes ties and Burberry sweaters i've bought over the years for the sugar baby (as gifts beyond his stipend). My current escort sees me twice a week. We never discusssed it, but he does expect me to see him regularly as we always book his time for the next appointment when leaving or he texts me at the beginning of each week to check my availability. It's a win win situation. I don't know if he sees others but his ad isn't up but he can have a few regulars maybe. He gets regular dependable work from me and i get the benefit of his generosity with his time (he doesn't watch clock) without the expected outlay of fancy dinners (although we go out, it's not always a 3 or 4 star restaurant) and expensive trips.

Hey gentlemen, I'm very gracious to all of my clients, and potential clients, for that matter. I appreciate the time and commiserate with travelers woes of flight delays and the frustrations that come with. To begin: my reasons for posting this reply are purely to clear up misconceptions and give just a small but of insight into my reasoning...NOT to be a cunt and fire back because something semi negative was asked/said about me. I have integrity. I realize that this is a somewhat rare virtue to posess in this field, but my word is as good as I. The reason I have the 10% deposit for future bookings is to deter the unfavorable clientel. I see the $22 as a meager amount that immediately repels the guys who want to call me and jerk off when they are asking me questions or set up a time a week in advance and then cancel the day of after I've extended or postponed a trip for that session exclusively. I chose 10% because the type of clientele I (and I'm sure 99% of ALL escorts) would like to book do not sweat $20 in the grand scheme of things. I hope that this has given some validity to my policy.
As far as the scam artist in HK- I'd like to think that my 20+ five star reviews would be enough of a testament to my quality and reputation.
As for the "irate" message: I truly despise textual conversations for the primary reason of the inability to convey subtext and intent. I'm sorry that I came off that way.
 
Thank you for alllowing me to post on this matter and i hope this may have cleared the air.
 
And what did the "proudly works forbTreasure Island" reply mean? LoL not following that (dig?)
 
Have a good night gents!
Parker
xoxxxoxo

Hey Juan... What's with you being all thoughtful and intelligent in your posts? I thought Latin men were all machismo and basically walking sex objects. Where'd all the wisdom come from? I'm sooo confused. Same goes for you latbear4blk.

I am one of those here who like str8 dudes. I fantasy about hot men fucking girls and make them moan. I am very much interested in watching str8 porn with focus on the man. So, I do like corbin fisher's str8 porn. Once upon a time there was a website dedicated to str8 sex for gay eyes, I like it, but unfortunately the male actors are not very attractive. Those str8 porns with focus on the women and dont even show the face of the guy will not earn a penny from me.

Does it really make any difference if the escort is providing what YOU want ? I wouldnt give a fuck what label he puts on himself.

Everyone deserves a second chance, even if he is a convicted criminal, which is not the case presented by the OP, but even in that extreme case I would consider the circumstances to make a decision. Circumstances are everything.
Specially those of us who like playing with young black urban boys from the hood, you better have an open mind about criminal backgrounds.

people convicted of crimes, even "violent" crimes, are not necessarily repeat offenders and circumstances vary and are important.

As long as we're discussing morality like this, what difference would it make if they had a criminal record?
 
A criminal record doesn't give you an understanding. Turning someone away because of the existence of a criminal record is just fear mongering.
 
If you're looking for a reason not to hire someone, great, don't hire them. But, once a person has been convicted and done their time, shouldn't we be giving the person a chance?
 
I don't carry all my extra cash, or all of my valuable, or everything I have, to an encounter. Anymore than I carry them to the doctor's office or the gym. I'm not inviting someone to my home and into my office or safe. And I'm not hiring for an overnight with someone I haven't met.
 
So, if they have a criminal record, so what? If they can do the job I hire them to do, and I take the same standard precautions, then, ok by me.