pubic_assistance

What an odd statement. The Susquehanna river valley is beautiful. The only "awful" parts are Harrisburg and Sunbury, both of which filled up with a lot of welfare families who brought crime to the area.

You seem very personally angered about people finding fault with this district. Do you work as a district representative? You seem to have a personal stake in the matter, because you keep refuting fact, to paint a more rosy picture of the sheer incompetence of those in charge of infrastructure. 🤔

Those photos are at least 10 years old. Can't speak to how he's aged...but c'mon. A decade is an unreasonable amount of time to say...I still look the same. He may still look "good" and be aging well...but he can't look the SAME.

This is true. I've pondered this stupidity since I was a kid. I grew up in the Susquehanna River Valley which floods every few years and significantly so every fifteen. I've watched several charming villages destroyed over and over only to be rebuilt right in the same spot again, with an absolute guarantee of being destroyed again. New Orelans comes to mind when I think of this fire. Huge swaths of land destroyed and through a combination of disorganization, corruption and sheer stupidity, the homeowners were allowed to rebuild right in the worst flood zone. Sparse reconstruction leaves dozens of rat infested lots between homes and creates a disconnected community. Effective leadership would have condemned the worst of the area, leaving it for planned flooding and pushed the homeowners who wanted to return to the outer edges furtherest from the flood zone. Same goes for this fire. They need a buffer zone between wildfire 🔥 prone areas and residential construction. There should be no more homes than there is water to protect them. This is all rather obvious. I've studied urban design in school...and this is all pretty common knowledge. Yet this is California, so common sense is in short supply. It always has been. Overdevelopment is a fact of life there...and not one person refuses the kickbacks the real estate industry provides to stay silent.

Absolutely. But there are probably more scam artists on there, than there are actual providers. Most seem to be luring older men to spend a lot to get a little (or virtually nothing). A lot of fake massage with the opportunity to touch their body while you jerk yourself off. Others are just a lot of promises and then send you a request for a deposit. Which, of course is equivalent to tossing your cash in the toilet and flushing. You'll never see anything for it..and they disappear immediately once paid.

*damn* THIS is about as good as it gets. Beautiful 💗

That sounds expensive, given the hourly rate. How much did THAT adventure set you back ?

This is true. But part of one's maturity is a confidence in your life's choices. Enough to care little about harsh criticisms from random critics. Obviously depending on one's professional life...a "clean" public image may or may not need to be cultivated.

I met up with a provider who I had hired originally about 8 years ago. He was a cute kid / very sweet and fun but admittedly a bit skinny for my tastes. I did however enjoy my time with him. Found him again on Rent.men while I was working in Florida recently looking MUCH better now that he's put on a lot of muscle weight. Very very fit defined body and still with the original hot bubble butt that I enjoyed fucking so much the first time. Still a sweet guy but the business does seem to have taken some of his youthful ambition out of him.

Yes. Recently a former personal assistant of mine showed up on Rent.men recently. He had moved back to the West Coast during Covid. We initially kept in touch but hadn't heard much from him since his father died a year ago. His profile popped up in NYC over the Christmas holiday. I was surprised but happy to see him looking so fit and handsome.

Well...THAT is something we all tend to "keep close to the chest". My guess is that most escorts also prefer a degree of privacy about their work...so seems the less likely scenario to be discussing it with mutual friends. Your only risk is if there's something "off"in the relationship between you two from that past that you're not sharing here. That would be the only reason to try and embarrass you.

There's a great scene in Kronenberg's cult classic film "Crash" where people are turned on by car crashes. Two of the characters were straight men who got so excited by the opportunity to sit inside a vehicle that was involved in a famous car accident and death of a celebrity that they couldn't control their emotions and immediately engaged in full-on gay sex.

File this under: "don't shit where you eat." Because if you're closeted then you can't fuck ANYONE you know. OR...... You decide "Hey I've always wanted to fuck this guy and maybe it could even lead to a fun reminiscing about our shared past....maybe NOW is the time to get out of that closet I've been living in all my life". Just a thought.

Rational thinking is definitley not something Californa is known for. Yes. Absolutely. There should be ZERO redevelopment in this neighborhood. The state should condemn the entire area and return it to mother nature.

It's a joke, dude....thus the little *laugh out loud* emoji. Jeezus.

Both terrible trends. When I first started going with guys only the Hispanics were uncut. Now that I'm older it seems a lot of US parents in the 1990s chose not to circumcise. So between that and the hideous body art choices that some people make, there are a LOT of otherwise beautiful men that get discarded pretty quickly by me. That said...like @BOZO T CLOWN I will make an exception for someone with enough personality to make me forget their dick smells like cheese 🧀 😅

I agree with Bozo. Tattoos are stupid. It always interferes with a young man's natural beauty. I'm sure once you're old and tagging yourself it doesn't matter because you didn't have any natural beauty left to destroy. 🤣

I didn't think she paid for his murder...but I did pick up on the vague disgust of his existence. I think she felt he was deserving of murder but not enough that she would instigate it.

People need to be more discreet. Both client and provider.

Again. I agree in principle. But one of the major financial successes of the United States is the Government's protection of private property. You can't seize someone's home and tell them what to do with it unless its: #1 Brought to the legislature as an overall policy in advance of the seizure or # 2 Seized as part of military conflict. In this case, a private owner has a right to ask any price for their private property, because that's the definition of private property here. It may be gross to ask a lot more in desperate times, but I am not aware of any laws that prevent a private home owner from deciding what they may rent their property for (assuming the local laws allow them to rent at all)

In some instances. Yes. But if this is MY home, then it's up to ME and nobody else. This is not the same as a grocery store, health care or a utility.

I was curious, so I did dig around a little to get some back story. Of course you need to avoid the Crony-Corporate propaganda feeds like NYT, Forbes, etc etc It was a couple weeks ago...so I don't recall which publications I found the information. If I think of it, I will forward them to you.

Christian Charities operate that way. Business people often don't. The majority are going to charge the maximum amount they can.

I was rather shocked to have been banned so quickly and I didn't even initiate the conversation about money. Not didnt I have anything about g3n in my profile name.

If anyone had a drop of common sense (they dont) they would prohibit anyone from rebuilding in these fire-prone areas.