coriolis888

Does being rude make you feel important when you write nonsense on an anonymous internet site?

= https://rentmen.eu/RickyDecker -

True, but a clever leopard can cover its spots so you don't know they exist -

Actually, two different clients wrote most of the reviews. If you have a VPN, go into the ad and read the narratives on the reviews. Even though it is supposedly two different clients writing the reviews, the writing style is almost identical for the two. Also, the narratives are so long it reminds one of a television soap opera as to what is said over and over again. Maybe the reviews and the escort are legit but I must say, I have never seen such long-winded and gushy/flowery description of an escort. For those without a VPN, copy the link to his reviews and then click on the below link and go from there. You will see the long narratives in his many reviews saying the same thing over and over again. https://hide.me/en/proxy

You are correct according to the article linked above. Here is the link again: https://dailycaller.com/2015/07/17/...orn-star-behind-that-terrible-gawker-article/

Not only what you noted, if you look at those five reviews, you will see that three of the five reviewers joined rentmen in August of this year. Coincidence?

No, the OP described the waltz as a "fantasy or fetish/idea" which is not the same as a fetish, it is an idea. Also, I read it, I did not hear it. But thanks for your observation.

Dancing is a fetish? First time I ever read that!

I must be blind, I did not see a link - how about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1AkeBpyDsY

If you use a VPN to view the rentmen ad for "Rhondo", look at the two reviews. One is fake which was written by the advertiser but the first review was written by a verified client who said that the photos in the ad are of a different person. The reviewer also said the imposter stole money from him. Caution, caution and more caution. EDIT - If anyone wants to notify rentmen that the imposter is using stolen photos for his ad, you must furnish rentmen with a link to the original photo. Rentmen will remove the photos and close the ad. The imposter (photo thief) is in the second row in the link. Here is a link in case anyone want to make a report: https://www.pinterest.ru/raw0202/자료/

Even though your meeting with that character took place a long time ago, you should go to his rentmen ad and post a negative review. It is very possible that rentmen will allow your review. Don't ask rentmen, just post the review. rentmen might reject your review but they might not depending on how you word it. Be sure to put in the review the portion of how he pushed you from the elevator and threatened you with the police. He is a scoundrel. A negative review on rentmen, where he advertises, might help some future unsuspecting customers from a similar experience like you had.

What an odd conclusion. "All your concerns about potential blackmail" Early on, I mentioned that I am aware of a client who was the target of a provider who is currently in jail for attempted extortion. From that, you leaped to wonder if I "participate in this hobby" It is a good idea to read associated posts before making an incorrect conjecture.

You connected the dots - thank you

" Then, with the photo and messages sent back and forth between the potential client and provider, plus the photo, bingo, you have a connection that puts the client at risk for extortion." You did not connect this part of my post to your response. The words written between the client and the provider (in rentmen or similar site) together with a photo connect the two -

You are funny. I do not have linkedin. You said you are not from the U.S. Not all professionals in the U.S. subscribe to facebook and similar sites. I am one who does not like my privacy put at risk. I have no need for that type software. I do not accept all clients and I do not advertise.

Matt, you are a nice guy and I want to meet you one of these days. However, think about what you wrote. If an escort got a photo of a potential client from the rentmen site, there is no way that the photo cannot be traced back to rentmen. Then, with the photo and messages sent back and forth between the potential client and provider, plus the photo, bingo, you have a connection that puts the client at risk for extortion.

You live in a country where prostitution is legal. In the United States, it is not the same. People can have their careers destroyed if arrested for prostitution in our supposed free country. No, you are lucky that English law is not so bizarre like it is in the U.S. when it pertains to laws involving sex for sale or rent.

Uh oh, you missed my point. Our photos, particularly mine, are not all over the Internet. I do not have a facebook or similar type account. Most of my clients do not facebook type accounts. I am a highly private and professional person - not an escort. Thus, where you missed the point is that if an escort asks on rentmen or a similar escort site for a client's photo, and the photo comes through rentmen, it is easy to trace the source of where the photo was sent. The photo plus the conversation between the client and the escort puts the client at risk for possible extortion. I am pleased that you are comfortable posting your photo "all over the internet" but most people do not do that.

You said, "our photos are all over the internet" which I assume you mean you are an escort. A client, on the other hand, does not have photos "all over the internet" and some clients are quite vulnerable to extortion. For example, suppose you were a married man with a family and your sexuality was not known or suppose you were a well known political person whose sexuality was not known to the public. If an escort got a client's photo willingly from the client who was trying to get a sexual meeting set, the escort could attempt to use the photo as a basis to demand money from the client for silence. As I said, I am aware of one such case at the present time.

Most of the responses thus far all seem innocent and to the point. But - - - - I have not seen a response in connection with possible abuse of a client photo if a client sends a photo to an unknown person advertising on a gay escort site, like rentmen for example. As I write this post, I am aware of a provider who is currently sitting in jail because he obtained photos of a client then attempted to blackmail the client by use of those photos.

Many providers specifically ask you not to contact them through rentmen. They ask you to either call or text. A good many providers have that request in their ad. I believe what you two wrote that rentmen rejected your reviews for a reason that is inconsistent with their advertising protocol. However, I am puzzled why they would have such a (only sometimes) requirement when many providers ask to be contacted directly either through a phone call or text. Like I wrote, I never had a problem submitting reviews to rentmen and I never use the rentmen message system to contact a provider. What a strange system. They allow a provider to request only a phone call or text then reject reviews from some clients but not all. That sounds very unprofessional to me. EDIT: Here is a screenshot of an add I just read: it confirms that providers request calls or text - "QUALITY +++ HERE TO GIVE YOU WHAT YOU WANT AND MORE *FOR SERIOUS ONLY *PLEASE TEXT ME RATHER THAN MESSAGE HERE IF POSSIBLE TO ENSURE A QUICKER RESPONSE."

Not necessarily disappeared or deleted! His ad is most likely still there but under a different screen name. It is an old trick used by many rentmen advertisers to simply keep an advertising account with rentmen but change the screen name. Some advertisers lurk on this forum but do not contribute posts. Some contribute. If he is a lurker, and if he saw the comment it is likely he changed his screen name. It is entirely possible that the provider read the negative comment then decided to change his rentmen screen name.

Hi Builder. If you paid the 800 to one of the big three airlines (AA, United or Delta), you can get partial credit for the 800. They will charge you a fee from the original ticket of anywhere from 150 to 250 then give you a voucher to use on a different future flight as long as you were the one who bought the ticket and can produce a receipt. If it has been less than one year since the incident, you should consider calling the airlines to get a credit for a future flight. In the meantime, thanks for the warning about that no-show character.

You can please some of the people some of the time but not all the people all of the time. -

How odd. When I contacted a provider that had a phone number and the provider said he prefers a text or call, I never use the rentmen e-mail. Most providers discourage the use of the rentmen e-mail because of the time lag in communicating. I have left several reviews on rentmen, both good and bad. I have never been challenged by rentmen because I contacted the provider through his listed phone or listed text rather than through rentmen e-mail. If you like, I have the same user name on rentmen that I have here on this forum. You can access my rentmen reviews and you will see that I never contacted a provider via rentmen e-mail. One of the questions rentmen asks of a reviewer is if you actually met with the provider. In which cases, I did meet. I am not saying you are wrong. I am saying my experience with rentmen is different from what you described.