-
Posts
10,292 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Donations
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by RadioRob
-
Published by Reuters By Leah Millis WESTCLIFFE, Colorado (Reuters) -The ranch hand walks along rocky ground, the beam of her flashlight cutting through the moonlit night. She holds a shotgun loosely at her side during her patrol of an alpaca ranch founded as a haven for transgender and non-binary people. Penny Logue, who grew up on a farm, started the Tenacious Unicorn Ranch in Colorado in 2018. It had been two years since Logue had begun her transition and the U.S. Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ advocacy group, had just declared 2017 the deadliest documented year so far for members of the trans and gender non-conforming community, with 31 people killed. Logue says she saw that many in the LGBTQ community had nowhere to feel safe and struggled to find employment, housing, and peace of mind. “You have people that are brilliant, that just can’t interact with society in a normal way,” Logue says. “They just get shoved down every time they pop their head up and you watch it over and over and over again.” Logue initially rented a ranch in northern Colorado to raise alpacas, whose wool is sold as a prized weaving material. In March 2020 the operation moved just outside the small town of Westcliffe in southern Colorado with 86 alpaca, 20 chickens, 40 ducks, several dogs and cats, and nine people. On the ranch, gender is never assumed. Inhabitants are free to love who they love and be who they are. Rainbow and anti-fascist flags adorn the walls, including one featuring the three arrows of the World War II-era German anti-Nazi, anti-fascist Iron Front. “I got here and I experienced a love and acceptance that I never did before,” says ranch co-owner Bonnie Nelson. “I had true family for the first time.” AN UNSETTLING DEMONSTRATION As they settled into Custer County, the newcomers offered to do odd jobs for neighbors, started a community garden, and helped helm a recycling program. Logue says that won them a number of residents’ support, despite some ideological differences with conservative Custer County, home to about 5,000 people. On July 4, 2020, Logue and Nelson headed into town for coffee at their favorite spot. The Westcliffe Independence parade had been canceled because of pandemic restrictions. Logue and Nelson saw a steady stream of protesters, a number of whom were openly carrying guns. Some wore body armor. Amid American flags, one demonstrator carried a banner bearing the emblem of right-wing militia group the Three Percenters, video of the event shows. Another wore a shirt that declared, ‘It’s OK to be White.’ The phrase, according to the Anti-Defamation League, has become a rallying cry among white supremacists. Logue said she was the grandchild of Armenian genocide survivors and grew up on stories that taught her to respond to “anything that looks like fascism.” She wrote in a tweet that same day: “The Fourth of July parade in #westcliffe was a Nazi propaganda parade, I’ve never been so unsettled.” Messages and calls expressing transphobic hatred and disdain for the ranchers’ anti-fascism began then, according to Logue. Reuters has reviewed several hostile and anonymous online messages, two containing death threats. One was an image manipulated to show a gun pointed at the ranch house. In March, a volunteer escorted two armed men away at gunpoint after they were spotted climbing the hill toward the ranch house, Logue says. The identity of the men is unknown. The ranchers talked about the hostility in media interviews, hoping increased attention would scare off harassers. Logue says they installed cameras, obtained body armor, began to build a taller fence, and stepped up firearms training. The ranchers have not reported any of the threats to the Custer County Sheriff’s Department. The ranchers said they declined to do so in part because they had seen Custer County Sheriff Shannon Byerly in a video speaking at a 2015 rally held near Westcliffe on the anniversary of the founding of the right-wing Oath Keepers, whose members believe the federal government is encroaching on their rights and who try to recruit, among others, law enforcement officers. Byerly confirmed to Reuters that he spoke at the rally, but said that he does not belong to the Oath Keepers. In the speech, a video of which was reviewed by Reuters, he spoke about gun rights and his feeling that some unnamed U.S. leaders were showing signs of “tyranny.” The Oath Keepers did not immediately reply to requests for comment. Byerly said his deputies checked out media reports of threats against the ranch and found no evidence. He said ranchers were not contacted for the informal investigation because his deputies did not feel welcome at the ranch. In an initial interview with Reuters, he described a “confrontational” exchange between armed ranchers and one of his deputies, who he said was barred from entering the ranch when he went to investigate an April 22 car accident involving a ranch hand. Footage from the deputy’s body cam video during his visit the day of the accident, obtained through a public records request, shows a single ranch hand, not visibly carrying weapons. The ranch hand told Reuters she was unarmed. The video shows the ranch hand greeting the deputy at the gate, being questioned about the accident, and offering contact information. Asked about the discrepancies, the sheriff acknowledged in a subsequent interview he had been mistaken in his account. ALWAYS ON GUARD On a recent day in late June, ranchers and volunteers formed a semi-circle, spreading their arms wide and corralling a few dozen fuzzy alpaca into a holding pen for shearing. May Quinty Dynamic, a transgender woman from Denver, was among the volunteers. Dynamic said she was thrilled to be surrounded by so many other transgender people. She met Logue, who, like her, also began to transition at the age of 35. “I’ve been able to talk to everybody and tell my little story over and over,” Dynamic said. After a long day, Logue made her way back to her room as the sun began to sink, sending shafts of light through thick indigo storm clouds above the Sangre de Cristo Mountains. Sore from a day of wrangling alpaca, Logue collapsed onto her mattress and closed her eyes. Outside her door, the sounds of warm chatter and dinner prep filtered down the hallway from the kitchen. As she began to drift off to sleep, she rolled toward the edge of the bed. Logue’s hand fell off the side of the mattress and came to rest, instinctively, on her rifle. (Reporting by Leah MillisEditing by Donna Bryson and Rosalba O’Brien) Unicorn Ranch previously on Towleroad ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars’ Season 6 Spills Tea All Over the Pink Table Read More Supreme Court LGBTQ: This Season’s Final Report: Minor Victories, Could-Have-Been-Worse Losses, Trepidation About Future Read More 11 Must-See Miami Spots for Gay Travelers with Children Read More Happy Bastille Day? C’est Compliqué. French Ambiguity Lets You Celebrate Storming The Bastille, National Unity, Or A New York Restauarant Read More Billy Porter Pose: Found Growth Playing Pray There’s ‘a whole generation of us who haven’t really been able to process what happened.’ Read More Sexy Photos of Provincetown’s Gay Bear Week 10+ Years Ago, Inspire With Message: “Be Kinder … Make Sanctuary … Feel at Ease,” Says Artist Paul Specht Read More Trump Hitler Connections. Report that Trump told Chief of Staff that Hitler ‘did a lot of good things,’ Is One Of Too Many. Read More Emma Corrin, played Diana in ‘The Crown’, Chooses Gender Neutral Pronouns; Posts Stunning ‘intimate…new…cool’ Images in Chest Binder Read More Load More View the full article
-
Let’s talk about sex, baby on RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars. Come on, RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars season six! Let’s get traumatized! When you’re spilling this much tea while unpacking emotional baggage, things are bound to get messy. (I hope someone brought a Tide pen.) This week’s challenge tasked the queens with revealing intimate details of their lives and most devastating memories all for our viewing pleasure. But the real juicy stuff happened off the main stage, where it appeared once and for all Jan was about to snap. In fact, it feels like this whole season could end with Jan waking up from a coma, the whole season having only taken place in her mind. Truly, if you love to watch Jan squirm, this week’s episode basically feels like a supercut. It all starts with the ceremonial certification of the lipsticks. If you recall, Jan was a bit preoccupied with prognosticating how all the gals would vote last week when she made her vote. She lost the lip sync, so it seems a bit of a nonissue, but when the queens realize the vote is unanimous (or, as Kylie says, “anonymous”), you can see Jan begin to panic. While all the other queens chose to send home Yara, Jan picked A’Keria, based on wins. It’s a much bigger deal to Jan than it is to the other queens. She goes into a bit of a tailspin needing to know if they all agree to make these decisions mathematically going forward or not. (It should be noted that every season this sort of “objective” rule is attempted, it never works. There are too many intangibles, and how do you qualify wins vs. lip syncs vs. mini challenges? It starts to feel like an acting challenge inspired by Hidden Figures.) Again, these queens are unbothered. They tell Jan they’re assessing things a bit more holistically, but the ambiguity is too much for Jan to Jandle. And herein lies Jan’s central struggle. She is so fixated with giving people — the fandom, Mama Ru, the other queens — what she thinks they want. It gives everything she does that thirsty energy. That’s why she’s struggling with these votes. She’s spending too much time thinking about the “right” answer than doing the sort of soul-searching to make a personal decision. If ever there was a week to drop the act and be real, it’s this one. Continuing a hot streak of well-crafted challenges, our maxi challenge this week is dedicated to Jada Pinkett Smith’s web show, Red Table Talk. The beloved chat show is famed for its no-holds-barred, vulnerable conversations. Ru barely puts a twist on the format for Pink Table Talk, but it’s a much more compelling way to get to the heart of these queens than Ru’s podcast or Tic-Tac chat. It might have to do with the queens talking to each other, versus talking to Michelle and Ru. There’s an ease of candor throughout all of these conversations that leads to some really deep revelations. Well, maybe not an ease in every conversation … Ru lets everyone get into groups of three and choose a topic: Sex, Body or Motherhood. After the chats, this week’s runway is Clash of the Patterns. How’d everyone do? A’Keria gets real on RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars. Team Sex: Eureka, A’Keria and Trinity What a misstep for the other queens to let these three come together. First off, Eureka is already an established television talent, thanks to the wonderful We’re Here, so this is already up her alley. A’Keria is looking to bounce back after barely escaping elimination for two weeks. To cap it all off, we’ve got Trinity, who is having a stellar redemption season and is enjoying frontrunner status. Once they take it to the table, they’re great. A’keria shares that she used to live as a trans woman, but transitioned again to live as a man when out of drag. I hope we hear more about this later this season, because where else on television are these conversations happening? Trinity discusses what it’s like to have sex as an openly HIV-positive individual. It leans a little too much on educating, rather than her story, but she has other moments throughout the conversation that are light or more off-the-cuff. Eureka doesn’t disappoint in her role as moderator. She keeps the conversation moving briskly, opens up about her sex life and has just the right jokes to punctuate her story without distracting. Three stunning lewks on RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars. These three are also far and away the best dressed on the runway. A’Keria in particular once again walked a gorgeous lewk inspired by a mannequin, sewing patterns and soft measuring tape wig. Not the first time we’ve seen this kind of thing, but it’s my favorite take so far. Eureka is head-to-toe flawless in an absolutely exquisite, expertly designed gown that fits her perfectly and mixes wildly different patterns flawlessly. Just stunning. Trinity brings it, too! Her patterned eleganza has definite Black Panther vibes, and she looks note perfect. The judges have no choice but to award them top team of the week. I mean, put these three on Wow Presents+. (Or Logo. Or Paramount+. Or VH1. Or Gas Station TV. Whatever, we’ll buy it, you know we will.) However, all three queens are merely SAFE. Scarlet played the part a little too perfectly on RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars. Team Motherhood: Ra’Jah, Kylie and Scarlet Scarlet really digs her heels in to nab this topic, because she’s got two moms. It’s a cute story. Her mom met her partner later in life at a yoga class. They’re both named Sherry. It’s adorable. The problem is all in Scarlet’s delivery. This is not a character challenge, and Scarlet keeps dipping into character. It’s like a nervous tic. It’s not exactly like a TikTok influencer trying to show their “goofy” side, but it’s got the same energy, if that makes sense? On the runway, Scarlet wears a beautiful idea, which is a dress printed with her grandparents love letters, but it’s one of my least favorite things she’s worn this season. You can tell she was sort of enchanted by the concept, which is great, but the presentation lacks that chic edge she’s been bringing. Ru rips into her performance, giving it one of the most savage reads in the show’s herstory. She says Scarlet made her “uncomfortable.” Could there be a worse critique to get during such an authentic, personal challenge? Ra’Jah goes into the topic a little concerned, since she’s got a complicated relationship with her conservative mother. It’s clearly difficult for her, but ultimately seems cathartic. It provides a good opportunity for Kylie, playing moderator, to connect and share her own advice. It’s a powerful exchange, but when the focus turns to Kylie, she offers a pretty underwhelming story about her dog. The judges don’t buy it, and she’s up for elimination. Team Body-ody-ody on RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars. Team Body: Ginger, Pandora and Jan Although not her first choice of topic, Ginger throws herself into the body issues theme. Of course, she can talk about what it’s like as a bigger gal in the queer community, but she also opens up about her medical issues and is a sparkling hostess the entire chat. It’s a strong enough performance to snag her the week’s win. Pandora is fine. She discusses getting older, losing her abs. She makes just the right amount of jokes to keep it light, but without being overly hammy. She gives great runway, in maybe my favorite look she’s ever worn, inspired by Sally from The Nightmare Before Christmas. And then there’s Jan. Oh, boy. As you can imag-Jan, Jan really Jans this one. She’s so eager, it’s almost like an SNL sketch about a morning show, with none of the gravitas of Red Table Talk. At one point she does (a very rehearsed) joke about “the vulnerability the judges are looking for.” It just comes off as less of a joke, and more of the all-consuming thought Jan can’t move past long enough to talk about anything else. Just because it’s true, you still shouldn’t say it. The judges rightfully read Jan for her runway, which looks like something Charli XCX would wear if she played the Misfits in another reboot of Jem and the Holograms. So, already, Jan is on edge. Then, they go backstage to untuck and Scarlet makes her move. Instantly, before anyone else could seize the narrative, Scarlet establishes that she got glowing critiques, completely omitting Ru calling her uncomfortable. Talk about alternative facts! You can see Jan recoil. She’s twitching like it’s an encore of “Womanizer.” How NO ONE says anything is both shocking and so, so fun to watch. Because Jan has the most to lose here. It feels like it’s between Scarlet and Jan, so if the three safe queens who missed hearing the judges buy into Scarlet’s story, it’s Jan who will likely go home. Jan is very direct with Ginger, but there’s no big blowup with Scarlet in front of everyone. There’s a quick fake out with this week’s lip sync assassin. At first, Bianca “Never Lip Synced” del Rio is revealed. It’s just a gag to get a few Bianca barbs in before we get the real lip sync assassin of the week, Mayhem Miller. Eh. Luckily, Ginger absolutely murders a performance of Lizzo’s “Phone.” Not a moment is wasted. Mayhem is fine, and, more importantly, plays along with Ginger for some really great exchanges. Ru loves it, and Ginger grabs the cumulative $30k pot that’s been building. She pulls out the lipstick and sends Scarlet home. For now. So where does that leave us now? Let’s run down our rankings. I’m sticking with my girl Trinity at number one. She executed her vision perfectly this week during Pink Table Talk and on the runway. She gets more likable every episode, and I’m obsessed with everything she’s wearing.Eureka is not to be underestimated. Last week’s high placement felt a little flukey to me, but she’s yet to stumble so far. There’s a great maturity in Eureka, and she’s really learned how to leverage that big personality as to not always suck up all the air in the room. I love this iteration of Eureka.Ra’Jah may have lost a little steam, but this was an important week for her to show a more vulnerable side. She may not have slayed any individual part of the week, but the willingness to let those walls down goes far with Ru.Started from the bottom, now Ginger is here. She caught a few bad weeks, but this week’s edit was determined to sell the story of Ginger’s comeback. And it did! How could you not love that lip sync? It was so, so good, and she looked amazing.Pandora is holding strong, but slipping to the middle of the pack. She delivered on the assignment this week, just barely sharing enough for credit. Her runway was really strong, but she needs a breakout performance, and soon.I do so hope this is the start of an A’Keria bounceback. These runways have not been given the love they deserve. I can certainly envision a future in which A’Keria’s revelation empowers her to be more authentically herself overall in this competition and leads to a resurgence. Well, a blogger can dream, at least.Believe it or not, I don’t intend to be cruel to Jan. But the only way through this obsession with achievement and perfection and people-pleasing is only shattered by accepting the absurdity and futility of guessing what anyone wants. Wouldn’t you love to see what Jan could do if Jan truly didn’t give a f***? If she can’t break this pattern soon, it will be her downfall this season.I’m not sure why Kylie isn’t vibing with the judges just yet. I thought her moment with Ra’Jah was really powerful, even if her own story was sort of meh. Her Steven Tyler was overlooked, and her runways have all been killer. It does feel like she may be on borrowed time unless she can really start to stand out.It was a tough week to pick someone to go home, but Scarlet was probably the right pick. I also found her Pink Table Top tone to be unnerving, and the gown was a snooze. (A lovely, touching snooze, but a snooze all the same.) I know (and she clearly knows) she has a lot more to show, and I would be interested to see her fight her way back to the competition through whatever game-within-a-game is yet to unfold.How would you rank the queens? Catch up with all our RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars recaps. View the full article
-
True. Something like this won't change the world. It's meant as something fun. This was something I did for one of the other communities I ran years ago and it was very popular. It was just another way to help someone personalize their experience here and be expressive.
-
I would most likely not filter on top/bottom. Those fields are not always set at all or sometimes inaccurate. In my experience, it has been better to take that filter off and for the ones that I liked and reach out to confirm preference.
-
For users who are viewing this site via a non-mobile device, you might have started noticing titles showing up under a person's member group. They look something like: These are custom titles that can be given by administrators. If you would like a custom title to appear similar to above, feel free to comment your preference. I'll tack it into your profile for you. Also, it's possible to add unicode images to titles. This means symbols such as emoji and other similar things can be included. Examples of unicode images can be found at https://unicode-table.com/ An example of a title with unicode might be something like:
-
While I can't make your name itself sparkle (it's not supported cross-platform), I can give you a title. I'm going to create a separate thread for people to request custom titles. So if you want one for yourself, post it there. This is already WAAAY off-topic!
-
Check out @Pnklemonade... he has posted here on this forum a few times recently. https://rent.men/pnklemonade I've also had a good time with Boymadrid while in New York a few years back. https://rent.men/Boymadrid
-
Supreme Court LGBTQ wins and losses can be tallied with end of the session last week.Trends The U.S. Supreme Court session that just ended amounted to mostly a “tread water” experience for LGBT people—with several little victories and no spectacular losses. But there are sharks in these legal waters, nipping at equal protection for LGBT people in the name of religion, and prospects for the future are unsettling. The days of the blockbuster wins for LGBT people seem over, at least for the foreseeable future. No more triumphs, like the 2015 decision to strike state bans on marriage for same-sex couples (Obergefell v. Hodges) or the 2013 decision to strike a federal law (DOMA) which banned recognition of such marriages (U.S. v. Windsor). No surprise epic, like last year’s ruling that “sex discrimination” prohibited by the federal civil rights law includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (Bostock v. Clayton). ACB is no RBG, Champion of Supreme Court LGBTQ Wins In the 2020 session, which adjourned July 2, the composition of the court curdled to the right and, more specifically, to the religious right. The court’s most pro-LGBT justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, died and was replaced by Amy Coney Barrett just as the session got underway. This alone brought a sense of dread and gloom for LGBT prospects going forward. Ginsburg had voted pro-LGBT 90 percent of the time; many expected Barrett to vote just as frequently against LGBT people. Barrett had only two LGBT-related opinions to weigh in on this session. In one, Americans for Prosperity v. California, she voted with other conservatives to hold that California’s law requiring that the identities of major donors to tax-exempt organizations be reported to the state violates the First Amendment right of association for donors. In the other, Fulton v. Philadelphia, she voted with a unanimous bench to hold that Philadelphia’s interest in eradicating discrimination against LGBT people “cannot justify denying [Catholic Social Services] an exception for its religious exercise” in excluding gay couples from foster care. She, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted the same way on both cases. Bridge, Golf, 4-Square, And Supreme Court Appeals… And Barrett, Roberts, and Kavanaugh apparently withheld their consent to grant review of several lower court decisions that LGBT people had won below. It takes four justices to agree to hear an appeal before the court will accept it for review. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas wanted to hear four different appeals where LGBT people won in the lower courts. In one of those four appeals, the Alito-Thomas duo had a third vote from Justice Neil Gorsuch. But they didn’t get the critical fourth, and that left the pro-LGBT rulings below intact. Appeals Refused: Lower Court LGBTQ Wins That Stuck The appeals that were snubbed included: • Arlene’s Flowers v. Washington—in which the Washington Supreme Court ruled that a state non-discrimination law does not violate the First Amendment free exercise rights of a florist who claimed her religion required her to deny service to same-sex couples seeking flowers for their weddings. In this case, Justice Gorsuch joined Alito and Thomas, wanting to hear the appeal. • Gloucester v. Grimm—in which the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that, following the Supreme Court precedent in Bostock, a Virginia school district did violate Title IX of the federal Education Amendments Act when it refused to allow a transgender male student to use the boys’ restroom and locker room. Supreme Court LGBTQ: Many-times divorced Kim Davis denies marriage license and kept trying • Texas v. California—in which the state of Texas sought to file a “bill of complaint” directly with the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging a California law that prohibited state-funded travel to certain states, including Texas, which had policies hostile to LGBT people. • Kim Davis v. Ermond—in which the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that a county clerk in Kentucky could not refuse to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the Obergefell decision. Once again, Justices Thomas and Alito dissented. (Note: Barrett was not yet on the court when this case was rejected for review.) Clear Conservative Shift Gary Buseck, senior adviser to GLBTQ Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), said he was heartened by Barrett’s concurrence in Fulton. Barrett wrote a brief concurring opinion, explaining why she did not go along with the request to overturn a Supreme Court precedent called Employment Division v. Smith. Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch urged the court to do so, saying Smith burdens the free exercise of religion. In Smith, the Supreme Court ruled that a state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for using illegal drugs as part of a religious ceremony. The 1990 decision said a state law denying benefits to employees fired for “misconduct” (illegal drug use) was generally applicable to all persons. Supreme Court LGBTQ future is not the brightest with the arrival of Amy Coney Barrett Barrett said she was “skeptical” about the idea of “swapping Smith’s categorical anti-discrimination approach for an equally categorical strict scrutiny regime….” She said the Supreme Court “has been much more nuanced” in its approach and there was no reason in the Fulton conflict to overturn Smith. Justices Kavanaugh and Stephen Breyer signed onto Barrett’s concurrence. “You cannot write anyone off on the court at this point,” said ACLU legal director David Cole, in a post-session discussion. Cole noted that the Supreme Court has had a majority of Republican-appointed justices since 1972 and yet has made “substantial progress” on issues such as marriage equality. The key, he said, is that the Supreme Court “doesn’t depart very far from where country is” and, “because the country had moved to a point where there was just not a good reason to deny marriage equality in 2015,” the court ruled for marriage equality in 2015. Look Out. Outlook for Next Season University of California-Berkeley School of Law Professor Erwin Chemerinsky, speaking at a Supreme Court analysis session by the National Constitution Center on July 8, said he sees a Supreme Court “in transition,” since Barrett replaced Ginsburg. He said it is clear there won’t be any 5 to 4 decisions with liberals in the majority, and the conservative majority now means most cases will be more conservative appeals. New York University School of Law Professor Melissa Murray, speaking at the same session, predicted a continued “move toward religion as having ‘most favored nation’ status” at the Supreme Court. Two cases are already in the queue for next session: One asks whether a Catholic-run hospital can deny a hysterectomy to a female-to-male transgender patient. Another asks whether Boston, which allows LGBT Pride flags to fly on city property during pride month, can deny a Christian group to fly its flag on the same property. © 2021 Keen News Service. All rights reserved. Kim Davis pooto by By davidvmoore1976 – Supreme Court LGBTQ previously on Towleroad 11 Must-See Miami Spots for Gay Travelers with Children July 14, 2021 Read More Happy Bastille Day? C’est Compliqué. French Ambiguity Lets You Celebrate Storming The Bastille, National Unity, Or A New York Restauarant July 14, 2021 Read More Billy Porter Pose: Found Growth Playing Pray There’s ‘a whole generation of us who haven’t really been able to process what happened.’ July 14, 2021 Read More Sexy Photos of Provincetown’s Gay Bear Week 10+ Years Ago, Inspire With Message: “Be Kinder … Make Sanctuary … Feel at Ease,” Says Artist Paul Specht July 13, 2021 Read More Trump Hitler Connections. Report that Trump told Chief of Staff that Hitler ‘did a lot of good things,’ Is One Of Too Many. July 13, 2021 Read More Emma Corrin, played Diana in ‘The Crown’, Chooses Gender Neutral Pronouns; Posts Stunning ‘intimate…new…cool’ Images in Chest Binder July 13, 2021 Read More Load More View the full article
-
Details are posted below...
-
In order to support some things I'm working on for future changes, I needed to set "primary member groups". Names that showed in green (now simply in italic text with a plus in front) were ones that were flagged as being in the "Supporters" member group. This used to be the member groups that Daddy assigned based on having made contribution to the site. In the past, there were member groups such as Supporter 2015 Supporter 2016 Supporter 2017 Supporter 2018 and so on.... With the move to IPB, I consolidated those individual member groups down to a single "Supporters" group since there was technically no difference in the level of access for someone who contributed to the site in 2016 versus in 2017. At the time of the migration due to the way Xenforo handled member groups, these Supporter groups were added as "secondary" groups, meaning they were hidden groups that could add to a person's permissions without actually changing their primary member group (meaning members). In the back end, it looked something like: Username: latbear4blk Primary Member Group: Members Secondary Group: Supporters The change has been to move anyone who previously had a secondary group set to Supporters to having that set as their primary member group. I've mentioned previously that I want to give people that supported the site some "extra" benefits such as higher private message limits, bigger storage attachment limits, etc. In order to do this, I have to apply it to the primary member group. So I needed to take all of those people who had supporters as their secondary group and move it to being their primary member group. Those extra limits/changes are not yet in place as I needed to fix the group settings first. The new changes will come here "soonish". Member groups can be styled a specific way. Meaning I can apply colors or prefixes, etc to the group itself. This is why Cooper and I (meaning the Administrator group) show up as being purple and bolded. Super Moderators are represented as blue and bolded. Basically any group that is part of the site's "staff" have been styled to their member groups bolded and the specific group being represented by a different color. For the Supporter group, I originally styled the group to show up in green. (At the time, I was thinking green represents money which represents the original intent of the group.) Earlier tonight (and after you made this post), I changed the green styling to be a little different as I realized the green color could be hard to read in certain circumstances. Instead I changed the Supporter group to represented by a red plus symbol and the name being italicized. (+ latbear4blk) The specific color and style of each group is not "hard coded" by the software and just represent me setting something for each group. If anyone is uncomfortable with being identified as previously supporting the site, please PM me. I’ll manually set your member group. Just please realize that it may mean you don’t have access to those new “goodies” later.
-
In talking with Orin, (who had consulted with a lawyer and a finance person) there is no plan to pursue having an estate closed. There were no assets of value to use to justify the task. The domain itself, etc are potential items but since we're not trying to port those and have our own domain. At the end of the registration period for those domains once they expire, it will get added back to the available addresses to buy. Any creditors that might exist would basically close out their accounts. Daddy did not have a house or other assets that might be worth trying to liquidate. I'm going to monitor the original domain expirations and attempt to purchase them once they become "public" again. The last part that was still outstanding was Daddy's original server (and the redirects to this site) which came down 7/1. The server was rented month to month from a hosting company. While we transitioned everything, we left his server online to redirect people here. That ended at the start of this month, so we're officially on our own and flying solo. In terms of legalities, it's my name that is on the domain registration and other paperwork... if something happens and the government were to come after the site, they would be showing up at my house. However as you can see by how I operate, I don't consider the site "mine". I may be the leader of the community, but I don't see this as something I own. Should the day come that I need to depart, all of the access and information required to operate the site will be passed along to someone else. I have already taken steps to document all of the critical services and tools used by this site as well as the username/passwords for everything we use. A copy of that data exists with Cooper and should I get hit by a bus tomorrow, he has more information than what I had available to me when we started this process.
-
I have not had this happen with an escort, but it has happened with friends. My friend did not even remember the dream and it was not something that fit his normal personality. I would encourage you to remember we don’t control our dreams (or for that case nightmares). They might not have been having a good experience during that dream. At the end of the day, you need to look out for yourself but if you enjoyed your time with that person I would personally not quit seeing them over something they could not necessarily control or potentially even be aware of.
-
Reactions (split from NOTIFICATIONS thread)
RadioRob replied to HotWhiteThirties's topic in Feedback
I'm tempted to make this my avatar. (Though it's hard for me to give up my minions.) -
There’s no shortages of places for kiddos to dig into sand on a number Miami’s beaches. Photo courtesy of the GMCVB.Miami’s sexy, late-night party scene and chiseled, tan bodies may not seem an obvious destination for LGBTQ+ Parents, gay travelers with children. However, the city offers unique culture, gorgeous natural settings and tons of fun activities to delight visitors of all ages instead of (or between) the parties. Gay travel to Miami with kids may look different than it did when you came as a single 20-something, but that’s the beauty of it. There are so many different experiences awaiting travelers, each visit is an opportunity to uncover another side of the region. Don’t worry if all you know of Miami is Twist, Palace and Gaythering; we’ve got you covered. Beyond the beach, nature-loving kids and parents can explore parks, hit the water and even interact with the wildlife that call the Everglades home. As a cultural hub, Miami’s museums boast plenty to enrich and entertain the whole family. And if you think Miami’s haute cuisine and Cuban flavors are out of reach for the kids, think again. Click through our gallery of must-see spots for gay families visiting Miami. View the full article
-
Now THAT is where you want to actually use the Multi-Quote feature. It's designed to let you quote across a thread that spans multiple pages. For each post you want to quote, click on the "+" sign on the bottom left of the message (to the left of the word "Quote"). It will look something like: It's important you click the plus sign to Multi-Quote. If you just click the word "Quote", it will quote only that single reply. When you click the Multi-Quote button (aka the "plus sign") that message will be added to a queue that shows up on the VERY bottom right side of the page. It will look like: As you go between pages that box will remain so you can keep adding messages to quote. Once you're actually ready to reply, actually press that "Quote X posts" button. You'll see each message you selected and be able to respond in-line.
-
Yes there is. If you use the donation link above, when you get to the payment screen just choose the “Check/Offline Payment”. It will give you the address to send via traditional mail. By using the system above, it lets me know to watch the mail and also allows you to get a confirmation message automatically once it’s received. Feel free to PM me if you have any specific questions as well. Thank you for your support! It’s greatly appreciated.
-
The Fête de la Fédération at Champ de Mars on July 14, 1790. Woodcut by Helman, from a picture by C. Monet, Painter of the King. Bibliothèque nationale de France French people travelling to or living in English-speaking countries are sometimes surprised when asked about their plans for “Bastille Day”: they refer to the day as Quatorze Juillet (14 July). France’s National Day is not really about the storming of the Bastille, and the day’s English language name conveys a misleading image. But it gives us an interesting glimpse into how the English-speaking world imagines France’s revolutionary past. The most common misconceptions about the French National Day are that it is a celebration of the anniversary of the storming of the Bastille on July 14 1789, and commemorates the official beginning of the French Revolution. It is, in fact, a far more complex story. Jean-Pierre Houël (1735–1813), The Storming of the Bastille, 1789. Bibliothèque nationale de France While English speakers refer to Bastille Day, in France the day is intimately related to a different historical event: the Fête de la Fédération (Festival of the Federation), a mass gathering held on July 14 1790. In 1789, the people of Paris attacked the Bastille: a political prison, a symbol of the monarchy and an armoury. The citizens aimed to seize weapons, ammunition and powder to fight the royal troops stationed in the vicinity of Paris. 1790’s Fête de la Fédération was designed to inaugurate a new era which abolished absolutism and gave birth to a French constitutional monarchy. Tens of thousands of people from all provinces converged on the Champ-de-Mars in Paris to attend a military parade led by Lafayette, a mass celebrated by Talleyrand, and a collective oath-taking culminating in short but rousing speeches from King Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette. Oath of La Fayaette at the Fête de la Fédération, 14 July 1790, painter unknown, c1790-1791. musée de la Révolution française It was not an annual event: simply a day to herald in a period of national unity. Less than three years later, the king and queen’s heads would meet the guillotine’s blade and the constitutional monarchy was replaced with the French First Republic. An ever-moving date France has had many days of national celebration, each reflecting the politics of its time. Napoleon I (Emperor from 1804 to 1814) declared citizens should celebrate August 15: the date of his name day and of the Assumption of Mary. The imperial decree that proclaimed August 15 (Napoleon’s name day) as National Day. Bibliothèque nationale de France Under the Restoration (1814-1830), the regime celebrated its kings on their name days: Louis XVIII (1814-1824) on August 25 and Charles X (1824-1830) on May 24. The July Monarchy (1830-1848) under Louis-Philippe I celebrated its birth in the heat of the “Three Glorious Days” of July 27 to 29 1830. The Second Republic (1848-1852) adopted May 4, the first meeting of the National Constituent Assembly in 1848. Another new political regime celebrated itself once again. Under the Second Empire (1852-1870), Napoleon III returned France’s national day to August 15: his name day. In a little less than a century, France changed its national day half a dozen times. New symbols for a new era The disastrous and humiliating defeat France suffered against Prussia in 1871 led to the fall of Napoleon III and the advent of the French Third Republic, which needed its own new symbols. For almost 15 years, there was fierce conflict between partisans of a monarchy and those in favour of a republican regime. The memory of the French Revolution became one of their main battlegrounds, and the choice of a national day an object of dispute. Read more: Friday essay: what is it about Versailles? Some advocated for July 15, the name day of the last Bourbon pretender, Henri, Count of Chambord, in the hopes of an imminent restoration. Left-wing radicals pushed for January 21, the anniversary of Louis XVI’s beheading in 1793. Others wanted to celebrate the Tennis Court Oath, which signalled France’s rupture with feudalism on June 20 1789. In the spring of 1880, politician Benjamin Raspail submitted a motion to declare July 14 the national day: a date shared between the Fête de la Fédération — a symbol of unity for the right — and the left-oriented image of the storming of the Bastille. Bastille Day military parade photographed at Longchamp in 1880. Collection of Jean Davray Thanks to the ambiguity of the date, the motion was passed into law — without specifying which Quatorze Juillet was to be commemorated. Raspail’s motion received the parliament’s approval based on the connection to the Fête, but the question of meaning was left open. Bastille Day Today Quatorze Juillet inextricably embodies the curious and divisive legacy the French Revolution carries for the French. Beneath the veneer of celebrations, the question of the intrinsic nature of the Revolution and whether its goals — Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité — have been achieved is often relegated to the background. It isn’t a day for reflection or politics. It is a day of leisurely family activities and celebrations, adorned with a lavish military parade displaying French power on the Champs-Elysées. In the evening, fireworks and popular dances known as Bal des pompiers (the Firemen’s Ball) take place throughout the country. It is a time for fraternal celebrations, very much the ambition of the original Fête de la Fédération. References to the storming of the Bastille are invisible or near-invisible. The Revolution is seldom mentioned in the presidential interview. Symbols of the 1789 Revolution are still the subject of contradictory interpretations and public controversy, as the recent Yellow Vests movement has shown. It is precisely this carefully maintained ambiguity in Quatorze Juillet which has enabled its endurance as France’s National Day: it can mean many things to many people. The French can project their own understanding of what is being celebrated. They can choose between the storming of the Bastille and the people; the Fête de la Fédération and national unity; and everything in between. Or they can simply enjoy a day off and admire the fireworks with their friends and family, oblivious to the complex story behind July 14. Romain Fathi, Senior Lecturer, History, Flinders University and Claire Rioult, PhD candidate in Early Modern History, Monash University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. But if You Were Young and Downtown In New York City Around 1990 Bastille Day is Florent … [This post contains video, click to play] bastille day – Curated tweets by michael_goff Bastille Day Previously on Towleroad Billy Porter Pose: Found Growth Playing Pray There’s ‘a whole generation of us who haven’t really been able to process what happened.’ July 14, 2021 Read More Sexy Photos of Provincetown’s Gay Bear Week 10+ Years Ago, Inspire With Message: “Be Kinder … Make Sanctuary … Feel at Ease,” Says Artist Paul Specht July 13, 2021 Read More Trump Hitler Connections. Report that Trump told Chief of Staff that Hitler ‘did a lot of good things,’ Is One Of Too Many. July 13, 2021 Read More Emma Corrin, played Diana in ‘The Crown’, Chooses Gender Neutral Pronouns; Posts Stunning ‘intimate…new…cool’ Images in Chest Binder July 13, 2021 Read More Notorious Founders Of ‘Conversion Therapy’ Group Exodus Never Did ‘Pray Away’ the Gay; Come Out Again, Slam Similar Programs in Netflix Doc July 13, 2021 Read More Space Pride: Richard Branson Honors Pulse Victims with Pride Flag on First Commercial Space Flight July 12, 2021 Read More Load More View the full article
-
Published by BANG Showbiz English Billy Porter’s role in ‘Pose’ helped him “heal” from his “trauma and grief”. The 51-year-old actor – who revealed earlier this year he was diagnosed as HIV+ 14 years ago – could see similarities between the journey of his character, Pray Tell, and his own life, and the FX series has also helped his friends realise they still had issues to “process”. He told E! News: “What I understood from day one was that I could use Pose and the character of Pray Tell in proxy for my own healing and my own journey with trauma and grief as it relates to that time period. “One of the things that has stuck out for me about the whole thing is a lot of my older friends were calling and saying, ‘Oh, I didn’t know that I had anything left to process.'” The final season was set in the mid 90s and saw Pray Tell offered a spot on an HIV drug trial and Billy recalled how once the medication was developed that made the illness easier to manage, “everybody moved on, as if it never happened”, leaving a “whole generation” with struggles they still need to work through. He explained: “So there’s a whole generation of us who haven’t really been able to process what happened to us in relation to healing trauma. “And that’s been the biggest part of this particularly in the last season, is how I’ve been able to use it as an agent of healing. And I hope that as an example we can be that for others.” The Emmy award-winning star hailed appearing on the show, which came to an end last month, as his “greatest, greatest honour” and he thinks it’s had a significant cultural impact. He said: “The whole process for me, from start to finish, has really been about stepping into what visibility means and how art has the power to change the hearts and minds of people from the inside out. “It’s like my goal has always been my art as activism, my art as healing. It has been very healing to me and to be able to share that energy through this work with the world has just been my greatest, greatest honour.” Billy Porter Pose previously on Towleroad Sexy Photos of Provincetown’s Gay Bear Week 10+ Years Ago, Inspire With Message: “Be Kinder … Make Sanctuary … Feel at Ease,” Says Artist Paul Specht July 13, 2021 Read More Trump Hitler Connections. Report that Trump told Chief of Staff that Hitler ‘did a lot of good things,’ Is One Of Too Many. July 13, 2021 Read More Emma Corrin, played Diana in ‘The Crown’, Chooses Gender Neutral Pronouns; Posts Stunning ‘intimate…new…cool’ Images in Chest Binder July 13, 2021 Read More Notorious Founders Of ‘Conversion Therapy’ Group Exodus Never Did ‘Pray Away’ the Gay; Come Out Again, Slam Similar Programs in Netflix Doc July 13, 2021 Read More Space Pride: Richard Branson Honors Pulse Victims with Pride Flag on First Commercial Space Flight July 12, 2021 Read More ‘Everyone, meet John,’ Dillon Passage Intros New Boyfriend, Says He’ll Support His Ex, Joe Exotic and Will Welcome Him Home After Jail July 12, 2021 Read More Load More View the full article
-
By the way... there was a comment earlier about not being good at Multi-Quote. Below is a tip/trick that might make quoting multiple people at the same time easier: As you're viewing a post, if you highlight any text... you will see an option for quoting that text. It will look something like: If you click that "Quote selection" button, it will add whatever is highlighted to your reply section down at the bottom of the page. After adding it, find where it was inserted and type any comments you want to make. If you want to quote multiple things, just back up and find something else you want to quote. Simply highlight that new text and use the "Quote selection" box again. It will add that new text down below as well where you can again comment on it. You can do this as many times as you want and all of the replies will be added in the order in which you added them. Hopefully this will help you in your commenting endeavors!
-
I understand. Hopefully reducing the timer from 5 to 1 minute helps. My posts missed being merged by a matter of literally seconds!! Haha. The reason I asked about why was even if my posts did merge, it would not have made a difference to me. It would have still gotten my thoughts shared. The only original reason I could come up with regarding why posts should not merge is that it could reduce post count. Since there were other valid reasons for lowering the time, it made sense to do it.
-
You want to DECREASE the time. Not increase it. If the value is increased it’s a longer time in which topics would be merged. I would prefer not to set “Never” because there are situations where people post something and have that “oh I forgot one last thought” moment. However I have reduced the timer from 5 to 1 minute. Is that more workable? (Also new gallery won’t have this setting at all as it does not apply to albums.)
-
Is there a reason you would want two separate posts instead of allowing them to be merged? I can reduce the merge timer… I’m just trying to understand why you would not want them merged.
-
Within the last update or so a new setting was added that merged multiple postings if posted in a certain amount of time. I can adjust the time if it’s problematic.
-
I could give you a lot of technical mumbo-jumbo, but I'll boil it down to this... I work in cyber security for my day job. My customers are most of the large banks on the east coast. Those folks that I interact with from the banks "off the record" for certain things are done via Signal. That is their preferred application of choice.
Contact Info:
The Company of Men
C/O RadioRob Enterprises
3296 N Federal Hwy #11104
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306
Email: [email protected]
Help Support Our Site
Our site operates with the support of our members. Make a one-time donation using the buttons below.