Jump to content

José Soplanucas

+ Supporters
  • Posts

    13,460
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by José Soplanucas

  1. You are correct, PNP does not refer to weed. That is because you are judging all users by the messy ones, the ones that you can obviously see are high and fucked up. Who knows how many times you interacted with users without even noticing.
  2. I was being sarcastic. I have seen him, or I'd rather say those pictures, in A4A and backpage in DC many times. It never stroke me as real, though. Of course, I may be wrong. I wish I am.
  3. It depends on the circumstances. If the provider is abusing the substance and this is affecting his ability to perform or his appearance, I am not interested. Otherwise, why not. I do not think it is fair to measure all substance users by the abusers. I do not think anyone would think it is fair to assimilate alcoholic beverages drinkers to drunkards.
  4. If he is real, I marry him.
  5. How can we see pictures of the guys you are offering?
  6. I forgot to mention in my review that Fabian is soon heading to New York City. Lucky newyorkers, do not miss this sexy bomb.
  7. 2017 is still going. It has been a great year for me so far (in our particular field), and I still hope will gift me with more surprises before going away.
  8. Feliz cumpleaños!
  9. There you go: http://ilikepinga.com/2017/12/10/fabian-marco/
  10. I met him today. I already submitted a review to Daddy and soon I will post one in my blog. He is great, I am going to see him again as soon as I am able to.
  11. http://24.media.tumblr.com/aa30da775524fbb48a8d26ca6f143cfd/tumblr_mzuy29QwRt1qeak1oo1_400.gif ASK FOR A VIDEOCONFERENCE
  12. Lo siento, Greg. Hug!
  13. To me, it sounds just like another euphemism, more sophisticated but still a pretty obvious BS. I do believe it is better to have the disclaimer than otherwise. What I am not being convinced about is the alleged superiority of your disclaimer over the standard one.
  14. Honestly, I do not see a significant difference between both disclaimers.
  15. My missed Rio de la Plata sister! Hell no, Punta del Este is expensive and too fancy for me. I like Montevideo and Colonia del Sacramento.
  16. Hey Matt! Why do you think a jury or a judge would take that disclaimer more seriously than the standard one?
  17. I love Uruguay, but it is not a cheap country. None of South Cone countries is, that is why I did not even mention Chile. I would never live in the Caribbean, no hurricanes for me. Mexico, lets see in a few years. Right now my strongest candidates are Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru.
  18. In the ones in Buenos Aires, you were able to enjoy for free the boys parade, choose the one you preferred, and get a room and a drink for the hour fee. I remember once I wanted to celebrate my birthday with a “taxi boy”. I called the agency (I don’t remember which one, 25 years ago), and describe to them what I was looking for. I rejected 3 boys they sent to my place before I took the 4th.
×
×
  • Create New...