MikeBiDude

See message #8 where Gman states a sister-in-law whips fresh cream for the recipe

Still doesn’t mean they EVER filmed a scene...

Yeah I’d be skeptical of statements that are basically checkboxes yes/no on RM profiles. And my post was referencing his many daddys reviews which say zilch about porn movies

It says that in the review link I posted?

Yup, Kristian reviewed on Daddy’s just a few short days ago https://www.daddysreviews.com/venue/usa/california/south/kristian_elix_la

Uh-huh

We’ve had many discussions about the way a gentleman might run his business model, from Brodie Sinclair, JustinTeen, to forum favorites like Tristan B. Fact remains they are free to run whatever kind of paradigm they want to advertise and market business. If it’s working for them, they will continue to be successful. If is doesn’t work....they will adjust or leave the biz. The first time I met Grayson was a matter of 2-3 texts, no deposit, met in a hotel lobby for a beer and chat and moved on. I repeated with him, including meetings in my personal residence/home. Repeated discussion here is only so helpful to a point....too much hassle? Move on to the next one.

Yes, turducken is a delicacy best tried once. Happy Thanksgiving, Gman! And everyone!

He’s bumped older ones. This one is extra special because the original link is dead, so he’s doing it just to amuse himself

Thanks Newbie

Good catch....

https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/411-on-franco-from-a4a.130101/unread

Yinz opened the door here to his religion and politics, he should be allowed to answer and stand up for himself here too.

Simple as this https://ispot.tv/a/wRAG

Yup, and WHO draws it?

Correct. But also consider is the Ancestry et al database any better protected than say Experian? Target? I’m am so NOT a conspiracy theorist, but somehow this one strikes me as a future loose canon.

www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/lawenforcement Law Enforcement Requests in the United States: Ancestry will release basic subscriber information as defined in 18 USC § 2703©(2) about Ancestry users to law enforcement only in response to a valid trial, grand jury or administrative subpoena. Ancestry will release additional account information or transactional information pertaining to an account (such as search terms, but not including the contents of communications) only in response to a court order issued pursuant to 18 USC § 2703(d). Contents of communications and any data relating to the health or DNA of an Ancestry user will be released only pursuant to a valid search warrant from a government agency with proper jurisdiction. If we receive a valid request under U.S. law to preserve records that constitute potentially relevant evidence in legal proceedings, we will preserve, but not disclose, a temporary snapshot of the relevant account records for 90 days pending service of valid legal process as described above.

He answers a lot of his own new posts, that helps the message count reach the dime

Really? Elaborate?

Must be a newbie record?

And now your DNA is accessible by law enforcement

Mmmmmmm, Joe’s pizza

All the best it’s will be an amazing worthwhile journey...

Who brines their turkey? Bobby Flay said in one of his books “once you start bringing poultry you don’t go back..” this has been true for me. I’m not talking over the counter store bought brined birds that are injected to pump up their weight. I make herb brine, Chinese five spice brine, Apple/sage brine, Cajun brine, citrus brine. My pineapple/orange brine for duck is a winner! And try bringing those healthy boneless/skinless chix breast sometime...adds a lot of flavor.

I don’t think he targets “liberal money”. We’ve met three times and while fundamentalism has been discussed, politics never have. I guess for an overnight or extended trip an escort (or client’s) politics might matter. I was much too busy during hour couple hour visits enjoying Grayson and pushing his sexual envelope