The story is suspicious (it is the Post, after all), and not just because it uses the word “masseuse.” I don’t believe this: “…allegedly offered undercover cops sex acts for less than $100 — including some specific acts as an la carte option — following their massages earlier this year…”
Following their massages? Like, the cop had a massage, then got the offer? Or the offer was being made upfront during the massage booking, that a happy ending was possible for extra following the massage? Neither one is plausible.
And poor reporting is a Post specialty, so who knows what actually went down with the, uh, masseuse.