rvwnsd

They are probably just goofing around.

I agree 100%. I've seen him several times over the last few years and have always enjoyed the time we spend. We just got together a couple weeks ago when he was in Phoenix. He's put on a lot of muscle and looked exactly like he does in his most recent pics. He's very sweet.

I recall a provider whose RM map location was the Monroe/Dearborn station of the Chicago Transit Authority Blue Line subway. Here in Phoenix, their location is often a post office.

I've noticed this too and I think it is new. I've also seen rate information on a couple of profiles using the app. I checked this provider's profile using a VPN and saw additional reviews that were not visible without the VPN. Either a bug has been introduced to production or they are filtering reviews based on keywords. My guess is a software bug is at work here.

A couple of active Forum members recommended him in this old, locked thread. You could reach out via DM and ask about their experiences.

While I find the prose in their profiles to be amusing (especially Greek god turned Russian warrior Leoniidas) I liked it better when the profiles said they were sportif and gave good sexi.

I haven't met him, but the pic of his cock next to the Dove deodorant can is several years old. Apparently, he is re-posting old pics.

I'd ignore it. Just curious: Why would you cancel the meeting with him?

Good call-out. That's my thought, also, especially since "PNP" is listed as an interest. As much as I like to give folks the benefit of the doubt, I think it is the latter.

My approach is similar to @pubic_assistance's, with a subtle difference. In my first message I introduce myself, state my interests, and close by asking the provider for his thoughts. No discussion of money in the first communication. Once we have established we are a match I ask "What is your rate?" Regardless how you handle the inquiry about his fee, be forthright.

The pics I am referring to are the ones below: In which there are no visible tatts and they guy in the pic looks considerably older than the provider.

Maybe "manufactured home?"

Pictures 1 and 2 (the ones where the guy is wearing a baseball shirt standing in a bedroom) don't even look like the same guy.

Moderator's note: Stop the sniping. This thread is about escorts in Prague, not about airing personal grievances. Keep the personal comments to yourselves. Thank you.

Moderator's note: Stop the sniping. This thread is about escorts in Zurich, not about airing personal grievances. Keep the personal comments to yourselves. Thank you.

Are you referring to their new site app.rent.men? If so, it is a beta version of the new site, which ostensibly will launch in two days. Beta versions typically have bugs and this is no exception. You can still use rent.men until the new site launches.

I think it is great when the automated message has useful information, such as preferred communication method, rates, best time to contact, etc. It is also helpful when a guy mentions the frequency with which he checks messages and an expected response window. Otherwise, it is pretty pointless.

Moderator's Note: To avoid confusion, the posts about Seth Stanton have been split to their own thread. Please keep this thread about Brian in OKC. Thanks

Reporting and confidentiality requirements vary by jurisdiction. A couple of suggestions: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has some information about testing and confidentiality. Discuss the issue of testing and confidentiality with your medical provider and/or the provider who will administer the test Check your local public health agency's website for information about STI reporting and confidentiality.

IIRC, the "frozen" status was introduced alongside "COVID Safe" during the height of the pandemic and allowed the escort to pause their ad so the expiration date would extend by the length of time the ad was frozen. Now, I'm seeing escorts who wish to take a break but don't want their ads to run out "freezing" them until they return from break. Not sure I explained this very well, but that's the best I can do with only one cup of coffee on a Saturday morning.

Oh, good grief!

The rate financial institutions pay for deposit insurance varies from institution to institution. I won't try to summarize this article from the FDIC's website, but suffice to say it is based on the institution's size and capitalization. Do I think banks would raise fees if the deposit insurance limit was increased? I think it depends on the institution. Some institutions are more fee-centered than others. What I find interesting is that small, community banks often have higher fees than regional, super-regional, and large banks and require higher balances to waive monthly fees. Individuals (i.e. consumers) can increase their deposit insurance coverage at a single institution to above $250K by titling their accounts so that they have multiple ownership structures. It can be as simple as creating informal revocable trusts (a/k/a "Totten" trusts in some places) by opening multiple accounts each having different pay-on-death (POD) beneficiaries. This article from the FDIC website explains how deposit insurance works. The FDIC also has an insurance estimator. Lastly, Bankrate has a decent article on deposit insurance. I like it because it calls out establishing beneficiaries as a way to increase deposit insurance coverage. Other articles reference revocable trusts (which is accurate) but do not mention POD beneficiaries as being a type of revocable trust. It is unfortunate that FRB found itself in this situation. They served a niche and served it well. It bothers me that they are referred to as a "regional bank," when in fact they were a boutique or niche bank. I look at Fifth/Third, Old National (out of Evansville), and First Bank (out of Colorado) as being "regional" banks because they serve a broad customer base across a geographical portion of the country. I think calling FRB a "regional" bank diminishes what made it special.

Glad to hear you didn't experience any hitches. At this point, the FRB business is still using the same systems it used prior to the sale and the same routing number. My guess is the system migration will occur in late 2023, probably over Columbus Day weekend, or early 2024 over President's Day weekend. Be glad Chase was the winning bidder and not PNC. I was a BBVA customer when PNC acquired them. The migration was a total disaster. In short, any customer who had both personal and business accounts linked to the same online banking profile couldn't see any accounts in online banking. This went on for more than six weeks. Most banks allow this, but PNC just couldn't get the data to convert correctly. The call center would send the customer to the branch and the branch had to fill out a paper form that was faxed to an ops center and processed in ten to fifteen business days. I ended up at Bank of America because their customer service is better than PNC. That's saying something.

I got the same thing using rent.men and app.rent.men The "Checking the connection" screen displays because RentMen and RentMasseur are now using Cloudfare to validate you are not a bit attempting a denial-of-service attack. For more information, click this link