rvwnsd

I don't care. As long as I have a good time, it doesn't matter to me what the provider thinks.

Moderator's Note: Several posts have asked whether the topic is about providers who are 60 and over or men in general. In this post, the OP clarified he is referring to providers. Now that we have cleared up the confusion, let's get back to the topic and refrain from commenting about each other. Thank you

Two of the most revered escorts on this forum are 55 or older. Dane Scott is 58 and Jake Mitchell is 55. I can't find DavidInSF's ad at the moment, but he is also 55. Aside from Mike Gaite, I can't think of any escorts who are recommended as frequently as these guys. A majority of the time, there are no experiences about any escort that is inquired about. This is a small community, so it makes sense that most members haven't hired most escorts. On Rentmen, there are 27 providers who are 60 or older. That doesn't allow for many inquiries about providers who are >60 years old. My guess is providers either retire or do something else by the time they reach 60.

He is from the UK and was there until very recently. Given the forum is US-focused (with some exceptions) this isn't surprising. Also, I check the UK RM listings pretty frequently and have never seen his ad. He might be re-starting his escort work.

Citi received a bailout that was later converted to an equity interest and loan guarantees. According to Citi's "Bank Find" profile, they "maintained operations with open bank assistance," which means they failed and were rescued by the federal government rather than being seized. Bank of America also received a bailout, but in early 2009. Like Citi, the FDIC lists them as having "maintained operations with open bank assistance." The difference between TARP and an outright bailout is twofold: 1) TARP was intended to help banks avoid becoming insolvent (Citi was already effectively insolvent) and 2) Healthy banks were strongly encouraged (i.e. forced) to take the money regardless of financial condition to avoid bank runs caused by a perception that specific banks were on the brink of failure. That's why healthy institutions like Chase took TARP money. Citi was the victim of mortgages going bad. BofA was the victim of good ol' fashioned dick-swinging. After Chase acquired Bear Stearns, the then-chair of BofA had to show Jamie Dimon that his dick was bigger and acquired Countrywide and Merrill Lynch. Sadly, that did not work out very well. Both institutions were treated the same as Continental Illinois was back in the 1980's after the Penn Square debacle. Fun fact: Bank of America eventually acquired Continental Bank. TARP funds were used to fund at least one bank merger that avoided a failure. National City was in deep trouble and PNC accepted TARP money which was used to acquire them. They were also used by healthy banks as a way of funding takeovers of banks that had failed.

Thanks for posting this. Not sure how I missed it! Yeah, gross mismanagement is another thing that brings banks down. Funny story: In the early aughts Chase moved several street-level branches in NYC from the first to the second floor of buildings to save on rent. Commerce then leased the former Chase space. A friend wasn't paying attention and walked into what he thought was a Chase branch, when in fact it was a Commerce branch, and opened an account. He was not pleased when he realized what he had done. He wasn't the only one who did this. That nonsense ended when Bank One acquired Chase.

Maybe they include the tip. 🤷‍♂️

I've been part of the forum (in its various incarnations) for more than twenty years. This is nothing new. Some guys describe what they want, and others don't. It varies.

And his Rentmasseur ad has expired.

IIRC, at one time you had to save your messages to the archive for them to be retained past a certain time period (don't recall what that period was). I've been pretty diligent about deleting or saving messages, so I can't tell you whether this is still the case, because none of the messages in my Inbox are that old. I suggest you asking Rentmasseur.

Although I tried to set up a time with him when he was visiting a few years ago, he never responded to my inquiry. Same thing happened in advance of him visiting Palm Springs. (It's a four-hour drive from Phoenix, so I would have made the trip). So...I moved on.

I also hired him recently. I found his body to be very hot and muscular, he was as nice as always, but he tried to cut the session short. We ended up spending the entire hour together. He remembered that I like a strong musk and certainly delivered in that department. His breath could have been fresher, however. Not sure about repeating.

Which is why it is always a good idea to ask the provider about his rate.

When writing reviews, I include the rate I paid without the tip.

He started out pretty hunky and then progressively gained weight. IIRC, he intentionally gained weight, but don't quote me on that. It's been a while since I last looked at his ad.

I'm very, very happy to hear this. I retired/was laid off from them in 2021 (a month before they announced the sale to US Bank) and know several people who were involved in the migration, including the person who led it from the UBOC side. When I heard she was in charge, I knew it would go well. Very happy to hear my instincts were right. PS: US Bank was the right acquisition partner and wanted to buy UBOC for more than 25 years. Patience paid off! The problem with many of these start-up banks is their size outpaces their leadership's ability to manage the bank. I'm sure their leaders had previously run small banks that sold out to a larger bank. Problem is, the bank grew to be a relatively large bank and leadership didn't grow along with it. While I agree in principle, the only super-large banks I'd bank at are Chase, Bank of America (which is where I bank), US Bank, and maybe Truist. As a former banker (see above) who worked for two of the world's largest banks (Chase and MUFG, prior parent of Union Bank), I think the Wells Fargo of today needs to be sold branch-by-branch, loan-by-loan, and account-by-account to other institutions that don't have the deep-running rot that they have. I mean, even Charlie Scharf can't fix them. Essentially, Norwest was the surviving entity that took the Wells name and San Francisco HQ. The worst of Norwest's over-the-top sales culture infected Wells and here we are today. PNC is simply incompetent, and I'd love to see US Bank buy them and ditch their leadership. I still haven't forgiven them for the BBVA fiasco. Back to the topic, I don't see a slew of bank failures on the horizon, as was the case in 2008 when three large banks (BofA, Citi, and WaMu) failed and several others (like National City) were acquired before they failed. SVB and Signature were in over their heads and had a too-high risk tolerance. Some banks are risk-averse, they appeared to be averse to recognizing and managing risk. IMO, First Republic Bank's demise was an unfortunate consequence of SVB and Signature, the coverage they received, and the "pundits" who were gunning for them, Pac Western, and Western Alliance to fail. They got their wish. Well, part of it, anyway. Pac Western was acquired by Banc of California and Western Alliance seems to be flourishing. Pac Western got too big too fast and made a few ill-conceived acquisitions that d,id not work out. The moral of the story for customers is to spread deposits across multiple institutions and/or title the accounts such that your FDIC insurance is maximized. You can have five accounts totaling >$250K, but if you do something as simple as titling them as "Your Name P/O/D Name of Beneficiary 1", "Your Name P/O/D Name of Beneficiary 2" and so forth you have created multiple informal trusts, each of which has its own $250K in deposit insurance. For bankers, it is to know when growth is too much and when leaders should step aside.

The first few images (him in the leather jacket, against the brick wall and with the trees in the background) show him looking about 10 years older than the pics he has been using for the last 10+ years. Seeing this, I thought "hmmm, why doesn't he just use current photos?" Then I looked at his Twitter feed and saw some stills from recent videos. Now I understand why.

He still has a profile there, but he no longer lists meetups as being one of his services. He sells vids, does Skype sessions, and links to his OnlyFans. He also had a Rentmen profile under the name "DanielCarter," but it has been hidden for a couple of years. I'm thinking he isn't available for in-person fun.

Oh, how cute! I've never paid a provider using a check. Before we had CashApp and Venmo I always paid cash. Even now, I ask whether the guy wants cash or CashApp/Venmo.

Nah. A couple of things contribute to a lack of response on this topic. Most RM providers listed in NYC are cut. The narrower the ask, fewer responses will be received. This is a pretty narrow ask. That's not to say it is a bad ask.

Moderator's Warning: Remain on topic (Diego Alves) and stop criticizing each other and sniping back and forth.

Given his Rentmen profile is gone and his BestFlex doesn't mention anything about meet-ups, I'm guessing he is not available for meet-ups.

Moderator's Note: There was another very recent thread about the same provider. The two threads were merged to keep the discussion in one place.

Moderator's Note: A gentle reminder to all the Sherlock Holmeses and Agatha Christies on the forums- Please keep any personal information you may find to yourself unless he has posted it in his ad, and don't post it here. Thanks!

He was the "Prince Charming" on "Finding Prince Charming," Logo's take on "The Bachelor." Here are some past threads on him: I thought there were more threads about him, but that's all I could find.