Escorts who PNP - to review or not?

[steve]

I have been trying to decide if I should review an escort that I met with that had been partying before I got there. I also noticed his "supplies" sitting on a table next to him.

 

It went downhill from there and I couldn't wait to get out of his place, which was certainly not the Plaza in NYC if you get my drift.

 

There were many items that caused me to extricate myself from a potentially bad outcome, but I have been trying to decide if I should include the PNP aspect into the review.

 

Had I known about the PNP as a possibility, I would have crossed him off the list.

[LookingAround]

Of course you should review.

[+ VictorPowers]

We use the site for informational purposes as well as entertainment. I vote to post a review. Good or bad reviews just provide more free information to others to hire or not.

[+ Tarte Gogo]

I have been trying to decide if I should review an escort that I met with that had been partying before I got there. I also noticed his "supplies" sitting on a table next to him.

 

It went downhill from there and I couldn't wait to get out of his place, which was certainly not the Plaza in NYC if you get my drift.

 

There were many items that caused me to extricate myself from a potentially bad outcome, but I have been trying to decide if I should include the PNP aspect into the review.

 

Had I known about the PNP as a possibility, I would have crossed him off the list.

I think that deserves a review.

If you are worried about telling too much, you can avoid telling what type of intoxicating substance was involved, while still saying that the escort was indeed intoxicated, and just describe the behaviour of the escort, and describe the non-relaxing atmosphere of the place.

[+ Keith30309]

I would want to know this from a review to avoid stumbling into the situation.

 

I’ve had the misfortune of a handful of these encounters and I’ve found the best course is to stick to the facts and avoid any conjecture or opinion. I write only what I know to be true and an independent third party would describe similarly.

 

For example, I didn’t say “The guy had been doing meth” but instead “He did not sit in one one place for more than a minute, his hands were visibly shaking, he was sweating while seated and his dialogue limited to a few short sentences” or whatever. I assume that most people will understand what might cause these things.

I only said “the guy was smoking meth” one time and it’s because I saw him firing up a couple of feet away.

[Kevin Slater]

I agree with others. Focus the review on what he delivered to you (or failed to deliver), not on what he had been doing prior.

 

Kevin Slater

[MikeBiDude]

Yes, review

[+ José Soplanucas]

As @Keith30309 and @Kevin Slater said, whether or not an escort uses drug is not my business if his performance is not affected. Do review, focusing in his performance.

[coriolis888]

 

I have been trying to decide if I should review an escort that I met with that had been partying before I got there. I also noticed his "supplies" sitting on a table next to him.

 

It went downhill from there and I couldn't wait to get out of his place, which was certainly not the Plaza in NYC if you get my drift.

 

There were many items that caused me to extricate myself from a potentially bad outcome, but I have been trying to decide if I should include the PNP aspect into the review.

 

Had I known about the PNP as a possibility, I would have crossed him off the list.

 

 

Many escorts include some indication like "PNP" in their ads. To me, that is merely a signal to avoid the person. To others, it is a signal that there could be drugs or drinking during a possible meet-up with the escort.

 

If the escort did not indicate in his ad that he is involved with PNP, I think you will do future clients, that he may snag, a favor.

 

Let us remember, the vast majority of us meet an escort for reasons other than PNP.

 

Conclusion? A review is in order with a comment about the items and objects that you personally saw at the escorts place.

[nynakedtop]

My only real negative experiences (commercial or otherwise) have been in situations where PNP was an issue.

 

An informed buyer is a happy buyer!

[+ José Soplanucas]

Many escorts include some indication like "PNP" in their ads. To me, that is merely a signal to avoid the person. To others, it is a signal that there could be drugs or drinking during a possible meet-up with the escort.

 

If the escort did not indicate in his ad that he is involved with PNP, I think you will do future clients, that he may snag, a favor.

 

Let us remember, the vast majority of us meet an escort for reasons other than PNP.

 

Conclusion? A review is in order with a comment about the items and objects that you personally saw at the escorts place.

 

To me discretion is the supreme value in our business. That does not mean I have not been indiscrete. If I have, I apologize. But I have to say it again, if his performance has not been affected, there is no reason to mention what was seen in his room other than gossip. How would you feel if an escort shares publicly private information that is unrelated to performance?

[coriolis888]

To me discretion is the supreme value in our business. That does not mean I have not been indiscrete. If I have, I apologize. But I have to say it again, if his performance has not been affected, there is no reason to mention what was seen in his room other than gossip. How would you feel if an escort shares publicly private information that is unrelated to performance?

 

 

I really enjoy your posts and agree with most of them.

 

However, in this case, the original poster said, among other things "It went downhill from there and I couldn't wait to get out of his place, which was certainly not the Plaza in NYC if you get my drift.

 

There were many items that caused me to extricate myself from a potentially bad outcome, but I have been trying to decide if I should include the PNP aspect into the review.

 

Had I known about the PNP as a possibility, I would have crossed him off the list."

As you can see from the quoted portion of the initial thread post, the escort's performance was affected. The client could not wait to get away from the situation.

 

There should have been some alert or warning in the escort's ad of PNP or a review should include such a mention.

 

It is not gossip to report that an escort did not perform well based on a client's personal observation of drug toys being present at the time of the meeting with the escort. After all, what is the purpose of a review?

[+ José Soplanucas]

I really enjoy your posts and agree with most of them.

 

However, in this case, the original poster said, among other things "It went downhill from there and I couldn't wait to get out of his place, which was certainly not the Plaza in NYC if you get my drift.

 

There were many items that caused me to extricate myself from a potentially bad outcome, but I have been trying to decide if I should include the PNP aspect into the review.

 

Had I known about the PNP as a possibility, I would have crossed him off the list."

As you can see from the quoted portion of the initial thread post, the escort's performance was affected. The client could not wait to get away from the situation.

 

There should have been some alert or warning in the escort's ad of PNP or a review should include such a mention.

 

It is not gossip to report that an escort did not perform well based on a client's personal observation of drug toys being present at the time of the meeting with the escort. After all, what is the purpose of a review?

 

You may be right, you probably are, but I still feel we are jumping into conclusions with no enough information. As I read his post, I understand he went downhill after noticing the items on a table. It is not clear to me (may be my stinky English) that the escort's performance was what caused the going down the hill, or the vision of the supplies.

All I am saying is that given the prejudice against drugs use obvious in this very thread, we should be extra careful and ask for more information before making any judgements.

If the client walked into the room, saw the supplies, and immediately labeled the escort beyond his performance, which I am not sure he had the chance to demonstrate, I do not think any review should be submitted.

[BabyBoomer]

It's clear at this point we need a few more details from @steve.

 

~Boomer~

[rvwnsd]

I think you should write a review that describes what occurred, the environment in which it occurred, and the things you found when you entered the environment. Said a different way, skip the part about him having used drugs and focus on the hotel he was staying in, the party supplies that were out in the open when you got there, and the things that took place while you were there that made you want to leave.

[marylander1940]

They can do what they want when I'm not there... but please no whiskey/high/420 dick when I'm there because that's a turn off.

[+ OliverSaks]

They can do what they want when I'm not there... but please no whiskey/high/420 dick when I'm there because that's a turn off.

I would love to hear about "420 dick"

@latbear4blk ?

[caliguy]

I would love to hear about "420 dick"

@latbear4blk ?

If by that he means rock hard then yes that would be my experience.

[steve]

I realize now I should have said, when writing a review on an escort that has been PNP'ing, do I state that in the review?

 

Just adding a few comments:

 

1. I have added a review on the escort's Rentmen page, the US pages do not show written comments, but when I was in Amsterdam last month, the comments are visible to all.

2. The entire experience would be best described as a disgusting disaster. I would not be far off by stating the escort's home, where I met him, was repulsive. I've never been in a crack house, but, the thought crossed my mind, adding to it that others were present in the home during my session and one even walked into and passed through the room on his way to another part of the house. I was told that was the 'house slave'.

3. Not only did the escort state he had been partying prior to my arrival, but the evidence was visible as it was on the table right next to him.

4. The escort was not able to perform, even though in his mind, he thought it was working.

5. The escort was making some comments that I would describe as being entirely delusional.

 

Personally, I want NOTHING to do with escorts that PNP. Several years ago I met with a very well-thought of escort who had been PNP'ing the entire day and was a total nut case when I met with him. He came recommended to me from another very highly rated escort who has 70+ reviews himself.

 

Given the drug culture and gay men, I think we should include drug use in part of our reviews. For the clients that are ok with it, it can point them to the right type of escorts, for those who are like me who want no part of it, we can avoid wasting time and money and can easily weed out prospects.

 

We have the opportunity to discuss alcohol, why not drugs?