Need a Review Fix?

[+ purplekow]

I did not think I really missed the reviews, but today, while I was posting on another thread, I could not recall the name of an escort I had hired awhile back. I went to the old reviews and found him by checking by date.

By using the date function of the search for reviews, I was able to go back and find old reviews. I arbitrarily went back to August, 2007 and skimmed through the reviews. There were reviews of escorts who are still on the scene and others long past retired and a few who have past on. There were hot photos of escorts, from ten years ago. some I had never seen. There were are few that piqued my interest enough to go into the reviews and read them.

 

So if you need a review fix, check back on an old date. The pictures are usually hot. Through the miracle of time, you can go back and read reviews as I did, randomly starting at Steven Kessler Review #80 in 2007. Man that fucker has some hot reviews.

[rvwnsd]

There are others that are so over the top they are funny. I asked Todd Dillon about one of his and he said it was pure fiction. He didn't say anything because the reviewer was a nice guy and he didn't want to insult him.

[LADoug1]

For some, writing the review is a continuation of the sexual experience. It becomes fantasy porn. Just fiction.

[Mydavid]

For some writing the review is a continuation of the sexual experience. It becomes fantasy porn. Just fiction.

I like this kind of reviews.

[rvwnsd]

For some writing the review is a continuation of the sexual experience. It becomes fantasy porn. Just fiction.

 

I like this kind of reviews.

Sadly, they are of little use when trying to obtain information about an escort.

[TruthBTold]

I liked the old reviews that we fairly explicit about what a guy will or won't do. Mainly because it recalled the things the couple had done. Alas, the new reviews (I imagine) won't contain anything like that. It will be valuable for basic facts so they are always welcome.

[BasketBaller]

I liked the old reviews that we fairly explicit about what a guy will or won't do. Mainly because it recalled the things the couple had done. Alas, the new reviews (I imagine) won't contain anything like that. It will be valuable for basic facts so they are always welcome.

Agreed, I used to dislike it when a reviewer would say "Not going into details, but..." I wanted the details! I imagine there will be none in the future though.

[+ bashful]

the old reviews that we fairly explicit about what a guy will or won't do. Mainly because it recalled the things the couple had done.

 

Unfortunately, as we have read here on the forums, it's not always the same experience for one client as it was for the other client (reviewer).

[Good Grief]

I have to say that some of the reviews I've seen in the past read as though they were scribed by blue-hairs "extolling" the events of the most-recent garden club get-together.

 

Mind you, not the explicit parts. Just the flowery language and the appreciation of "the bouquet."

[LADoug1]

Agreed, I used to dislike it when a reviewer would say "Not going into details, but..." I wanted the details! I imagine there will be none in the future though.

That's what PM's are for.

[jawjateck]

I liked the old reviews that we fairly explicit about what a guy will or won't do. Mainly because it recalled the things the couple had done. Alas, the new reviews (I imagine) won't contain anything like that. It will be valuable for basic facts so they are always welcome.

 

Most reviewers were...meh.....but there were a few who could describe a deliciously lusty scene with words. They will be fondly remembered by me.

[mike carey]

Most reviewers were...meh.....but there were a few who could describe a deliciously lusty scene with words.

I enjoyed your concise, sparce illustrated review of Alex!

[jawjateck]

I enjoyed your concise, sparce illustrated review of Alex!

 

Awww shux!

[TruthBTold]

That's what PM's are for.

 

Now, I do not disagree with what you state. However, as I remember it, when the reviews were fairly explicit (and certainly it was not all of them) PMs were probably being used less for that sort of thing. At least I only started writing posters here about guys when the reviews came not to contain very little information. We'll have to see what it comes to be but considering the political climate I would imagine things will be a Less is just going to be Less situation.