Am I being narrow-minded ?

[LoveNDino]

I guess I should have looked it up. Instead writing what I heard. Mea culpa.

 

This is what I found... "The foreskin is highly vulnerable to HIV infection for several reasons. First, the foreskin is delicate and can sustain small tears during sex. These tears may allow HIV to enter the body more easily. Tears also cause inflammation, which can further increase the risk of HIV transmission. In addition, there is a higher concentration of cells that HIV likes to infect (called Langerhans cells) in the foreskin than in other parts of the penis. Finally, HIV-infected fluids can become trapped under the foreskin and remain there after sex."

Thanks for taking the time to research and explain!!!!

[big-n-tall]

Thanks for taking the time to research and explain!!!!

 

No problem at all.

[Kunal]

I don't fuck much at all but I do have this issue. It's definitely less hard when I have a condom on. I still use one when I fuck but there have been times when I just gave up on the fucking.

 

Goes for me here too..If condom is not involved, fucking or getting fucked, oral sex is just as good really

[Kunal]

I'm versatile and I can honestly say when I bottom I'm very happy that my guy is wearing a condom. Feels just fine. Not judging but playing safe for me is paramount. And yes if I top I get the XXX large condom with plenty of lube and love to rim before I enter

Been safe is important to me too. The thing is if we have established that we are FWB or lovers, maybe, just maybe, we will bareback after a month or so. Hooking with different guys and BB? No!

[Kunal]

I'd think some guys are willing to top BB but not bottom bareback. Statistically speaking, you are safer topping bareback than bottoming with a condom, assuming you are circumcised.

 

Really?!

[+ sniper]

Really?!

According to this chart, yes. But be aware that on another page they break out circumcised vs uncircumcised, and the risk for an uncut top is about 6 times higher for the uncircumcised top, making it closer to the rish from bottoming.

 

http://www.aidsmap.com/Estimated-risk-per-exposure/page/1324038/

[Kunal]

According to this chart, yes. But be aware that on another page they break out circumcised vs uncircumcised, and the risk for an uncut top is about 6 times higher for the uncircumcised top, making it closer to the rish from bottoming.

 

http://www.aidsmap.com/Estimated-risk-per-exposure/page/1324038/

 

Ahhh ok