Jump to content

Epigonos, Here Ya Go!


jawjateck
This topic is 2595 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

BabyBoomer you are totally correct I missed this thread. I'm off to Puerto Vallarta tomorrow for a week. Upon my return I will definitely check into this guy. If he is indeed gay, versatile and full service I will definitely attempt to set up something. Will post again re this guy when I return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well guys that didn't work out, however, the guy is very quick to respond. He asked for a photo which I politely refused and stats which I sent re height and weight. He would allow stroking and touching, BUT NO kissing, and one way oral only on him. NOT one but two deal breakers NO KISSING AND NO MUTUAL ORAL. I'll definitely take a pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well guys that didn't work out, however, the guy is very quick to respond. He asked for a photo which I politely refused and stats which I sent re height and weight. He would allow stroking and touching, BUT NO kissing, and one way oral only on him. NOT one but two deal breakers NO KISSING AND NO MUTUAL ORAL. I'll definitely take a pass.

 

Mission accomplished! Thanks for vetting him and reporting back so the SoCal scaredy-cats know the deal with him. :p:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Saw him for a massage in NYC last year. Nice body but not as big and ripped as in the photos. Nice pleasant guy, gave a decent massage. Performs massage in tight white briefs. Major upsell at the end which involved escort-level prices for very limited activity (same as described by Epigonos-- no kissing and one-way oral on him). I passed on that. He did remove his underwear however for no extra charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Major upsell at the end which involved escort-level prices for very limited activity (same as described by Epigonos-- no kissing and one-way oral on him). I passed on that. He did remove his underwear however for no extra charge.

 

I'm of course willing to grant wide latitude regarding another provider's m.o.: I'm not him, perhaps don't have his clients and haven't walked in his shoes. But this seems a tedious/buzzkill way to handle things. IF I were an "upseller" masseur, I'd rather say upfront what the upsell is than wreck the mood by bringing that up at the end of a massage when I sure hope the client is blissed out. Maybe that's his hustle though: "Bank" on the client being impressionable at that point.

 

And the damn undies should be off IF that's what the client wants. But a VERY handsome Chippendale's buddy of mine handles it closer to this style of monetization (although he discloses the rate structure upfront): 2 C notes undies on, 3C notes undies off, 4 C notes for one-way French lessons. To each his own I suppose, but I wonder how sustainable this approach is for Brian, in SFO no less (where there are perhaps more providers of the Asian persuasion?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure it will be the case as long as you are as physically amusing as you are verbally. I'll spring for the communion wine so we won't have to drink the awful stuff the church serves.

 

"[P]hysically amusing" makes it sound like Justin Bieber. Maybe physically imposing as I am verbally charming? <emoticon for batted lashes>

 

Don't forget the body of Christ to accompany the vino, Father. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ric upon reading my above post I have to agree that the term "physically amusing" wasn't a very good choice of words. Physically involved would have been more to the point.

 

Thx. And I understood better shortly after posting/re-reading that you were referring more to physical activity than physicality. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ric upon reading my above post I have to agree that the term "physically amusing" wasn't a very good choice of words. Physically involved would have been more to the point.

 

Thx. And I understood better shortly after posting/re-reading that you were referring more to physical activity than physicality. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...