I do not understand the phenomenon

[noviceny]

Damn...it seems that some people give a lot of thought to shit I just think happens.

 

I thought Rick just wrote a lot cause he likes to write, must have DSL so the computer is always on and may have trouble sleeping (we both post late at night).

 

What a fool I was...Rick is obviously a cock sucker (and not in the good way) and a shrewd business man

 

Guys sometimes I can even follow a thread and some people seem to be able to remember everything that everyone has ever said. For this problem I would like to recommend Paxil. It does wonders for the relentless thoughts of the obsessive compulsive...no kidding

 

I also dont understand the self promotion thing...are you saying that this guy posts in order to get his name out there or is to specifically entice people with charm so they will hire him ? Again, I think the guy just likes to write and to express himself.

[HotdadENYC]

Novice, forgetting about the Paxil, or ANY mechanism for dealing with obsessions, including yours, I think you posted this response, yet once again, in the wrong place. It should have been posted up higher in the chain.

 

Thanks for your opinions, though. They are always welcome.

 

 

hd NYC

[+ Lucky]

RE: I do not understand the pheromes

 

Different strokes, love! It was a beautiful Barbie, all in purple with a Clay Aiken look...

[Rick Munroe]

RE: I do not understand the pheromes

 

Oh, well, if it was a Clay Aiken doll, now we're talkin'. :7

[Rick Munroe]

>I thought Rick just wrote a lot cause he likes to write, must

>have DSL so the computer is always on and may have trouble

>sleeping (we both post late at night).

 

I do love to write as much as I love to have sex and watch old sitcoms, but I don't have trouble sleeping at all (unless I have a snoring client). I've just always been a night person.

 

>I think the guy just likes to write and to

>express himself.

 

You're a smart man. Of course, I know that people get to know me through my posting and therefore I get work, but that honestly is never on my mind when I post. I just derive great pleasure from it.

[noviceny]

OK Dad,

 

lets see if I got this right now...I cant believe that I cant follow simple instructions

[Rick Munroe]

You did it right! I'm so proud of you. :*

[HotdadENYC]

>OK Dad,

>

>lets see if I got this right now...I cant believe that I cant

>follow simple instructions

 

 

You CAN follow simple instructions. You obviously did the enema thing really well, as we all witnessed. Can't get much more involved than that.

 

I just think that your response was meant to be elsewhere. I'm not sure where exactly, but as I read the threads from 1 to the end, your's doesn't fit in with the flow. NOT TO MEAN that is not important, everything you say is important to me, but I just would like to know what you were responding to.

 

Or perhaps you were JUST posting your opinion. That's cool too. Lord know that Johnnie Walker and I do that a lot.

 

Love ya novice,

 

hd NYC

[Rick Munroe]

I don't want to turn this whole MC into a neverending lovefest, but I just wanted to say I'm glad you two guys (and a few other new ones) are posting. You bring fresh blood (not to imply that everyone else's was stale) and new perspectives and friendly attitudes.

[HotdadENYC]

Hey Rick, I'll let you know when novice and I "enema together."

 

I'm pretty sure (at least I'm hoping) that there will be NOTHING stale about that scene.

 

Novice, are you listening?

 

 

Love ya both,

 

hd NYC *82

[Rick Munroe]

Yuck, I take back everything I said!! :o

[HotdadENYC]

>Yuck, I take back everything I said!! :o

 

Nah, Rick, DON'T take back everything you said. My posting was a joke as well. And I'm hoping that novice saw it like that also.

 

However, novice, if you want to do a buddy enema LOL

 

hd NYC *82

[noviceny]

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH You are tempting the enema gods !!!!!

 

Of course I know you are joking...but even if you werent, my policy is this, "No Blood, No Foul"

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

The Elusive Dodge

 

>That is not why I go to a message board

>that is supposed to allow consumers to exchange information

>with each other.

 

There are entire forums on this site which do not exist purely to discuss escort-client relations. Further, the forum has always encouraged the participation of the escorts, not just the consumer (i.e. the clients of these escorts). While there are a very few escorts who have hired other escorts and, more typically, a few escorts who have gotten clients to arrange threesomes so that the escort could "engage" another escort, by and large, the consumers we are talking about are the clients. One of the forums here is called ASK THE ESCORTS, not ASK THE CLIENTS. Personally, I would prefer if the site was a little more managed, i.e. that questions, self-promotions and other conversations about escorts by and between clients be kept to the DELI, as that is its purpose, and not the LOUNGE, but one of the attractions of this site to most people is the Wild West Frontier nature of it.

 

 

 

>I suppose one reason people here put up with it is that they

>find Rick's posts amusing or titillating. I do not -- to me,

>his humor seems exactly like the jokes I and my friends used

>to make when we were 13 years old and had just discovered sex

>a few weeks earlier. At that age, any remark that could by

>any stretch of the imagination be associated with sex seemed

>utterly hilarious to us. Some of us grow out of our taste for

>adolescent humor when we are no longer adolescents, and some

>of us clearly don't.

 

There is a reason why most comedies now seem to be made, even the more intelligent ones, with some fart jokes, jokes about other bodily functions and jokes at the expense of an individual. These movies make a lot of money and a comedy by Woody Allen or a movie like Some Like It Hot would likely never be made today unless you got to see Tony Curtis is fake rubber breast catch fire as in Mrs. Doubtfire.

 

 

>But it can be done

>-- take my word for it.

 

 

We do not have to. There are any number of posters and entire threads I avoid quite easily.

 

 

>How can escorts post here without promoting themselves?

 

Is this what you have been hiding? You are just the bitter, jaded, tired but horny nom de guerre of some formerly famous ho? Woody is Xaviera Hollander after her sex change?

 

Fine. Let me just log off and create a new name and profile. How does Sonya Marmeladova sound?

[Guest Mikel]

By definition..."phenomenon" is something that CAN'T be explained...so your question just can't be objectively answered. Just enjoy the phenomenon named "Rick"...I do!

[JT Brooklyn]

I do agree with Woodlawn..Their are a FEW Escorts who do, from time to time, contribute to the Various Forums without "Fanfare" and "Advertising". This I know personally. There are times where, the comments are definitely "Overshadowed" by all the Escorts "Contact" Info and Photo. It does in time, DEFEAT the purpose, for anyone who reads the Forums more than 3x's a week..When there is, a "One Line" comment, followed by 4 Lines of Advertising and a Photo, it is a Bit Much.. :+ :+ :+

[buckguy]

Whine, whine, whine. If you think someone's posts are a waste of time/space, you don't have to read them. I usually skip Woodie, Dougie, etc. unless there's some inkling that it isn't the same tired stuff.

 

BTW, Even the "without fanfare" guys are advertising. They're just more subtle than Rick. JeffOH, who recently returned to the board, is the only escort I can recall continuing on the board after "retirement". His participation is esp. notable because he was "forcibly" retired thanks to his local law enforcement.

 

As for Rick, I hired him a couple years ago. I don't think he knew I was a poster. I had a good time. His sense of humor is a little corny for a New Yorker, but I like his political posts.

[woodlawn]

>>What's wrong with that? In my view, the same thing that

>would

>>be wrong if representatives of cellphone companies

>constantly

>>posted positive comments about their products on a message

>>board that exists to allow consumers to exchange information

>>about their experiences with their cellphones.

 

>Your analogy (as usual) doesn't work here, because this is not

>a message board solely for clients. It is for clients AND

>escorts -- both groups are equally welcome here and both come

>to exchange information.

 

My analogy works perfectly. I never said escorts shouldn't post here. I simply object to those, like you, who use this board as a place to post free ads for their services. That practice does not fit my definition of "exchanging information."

 

>You have proudly boasted that no one

>will ever know anything about you (I don't see anyone asking,

>but that's beside the point)

 

It's not beside the point, Rick. The reason I keep mentioning it is because you and a couple of other posters keep lying and making up shit about me. If you didn't do that, there'd be no reason for me to bring it up.

 

 

and so nobody knows if you are

>even an escort or a client. I'm sure those people on the cell

>phone message boards would not tolerate, as we do here,

>someone who constantly posts that the concept of cell phones

>is morally wrong and won't admit if they even own one or have

>ever used one.

 

 

Rick, Rick, always making up shit! Find one post of mine in which I state that I think prostitution is morally wrong. Well?

 

>Well, it's comforting to know that, at some point in your

>life, you did have a sense of humor.

 

Oy! Another personal insult from the man who constantly tells us he never indulges in personal insults! Such a liar you are!

[woodlawn]

RE: The Elusive Dodge

 

> Some of us grow out of our taste

>for

>>adolescent humor when we are no longer adolescents, and some

>>of us clearly don't.

 

>There is a reason why most comedies now seem to be made, even

>the more intelligent ones, with some fart jokes, jokes about

>other bodily functions and jokes at the expense of an

>individual. These movies make a lot of money

 

The reason, you chubby little devil you, is that the majority of movie tickets sold in the United States each year are purchased by people who are either adolescents or only a few years past their adolescence. Hollywood releases are full of adolescent humor because they are made for adolescents.

 

>We do not have to. There are any number of posters and entire

>threads I avoid quite easily.

 

Please add me to your "avoid" list. Thanks.

[Rick Munroe]

>Find one post of mine in

>which I state that I think prostitution is morally wrong.

>Well?

 

No need to. Devon put it best when he said (9-16-03): "woodlawn...manages to work that theme into practically every post he writes. I suppose (he'll) deny what is self-evident by demanding that I produce a quote that uses the exact words 'immoral' or 'wrong,'... but you only need a passing familiarity with his posting history to notice that he is deeply disturbed by what he is doing and is on a never-ending mission to convince others of just how dirty and evil hiring escorts is."

[woodlawn]

>>Find one post of mine in

>>which I state that I think prostitution is morally wrong.

>>Well?

 

>No need to. Devon put it best when he said

 

THAT'S your authority? Devon, the escort who constantly assured this board that he had his life together and under control, while he was actually suffering from bipolar disorder and medicating himself with crystal meth until a public breakdown landed him in a mental hospital? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

 

Thanks, Rick. That is the first thing you've posted in years that I find genuinely funny.

[noviceny]

Wow,

 

That one just blew me away. I never thought that woodlawn said any stuff that was really that bad, but to bring up something like that...I dont even know what to say.

 

My heart goes out to anyone suffering from any ailment : physical, mental or spiritual...

[PacNW]

>

>Thanks, Rick. That is the first thing you've posted in years

>that I find genuinely funny.

>

Didn't think I'd ever say this, but I liked you better when you weren't trying to have a sense of humor.

[Rick Munroe]

>I never thought that woodlawn

>said any stuff that was really that bad

 

If you can stomach it, do a search through the archives for any posts by woodlawn or regulation. It isn't pretty.

[Doug69]

>>Find one post of mine in

>>which I state that I think prostitution is morally wrong.

>>Well?

>

>No need to.

 

I sure hope Woodlawn says something - and soon - that I hate, because arguing with him is, at least for me, way more fun than defending him, but once again here, I just can't help myself. The oft-made accusation that Woodlawn argues (or says thing which necessarily imply) that prostitution is immoral is just simply and utterly false. And the reason why I find it worthwhile to point that out isn't because Woodlawn needs to be rescued, but because it's illustrative of an all-too-common trend around here: if you don't spout the prevailing orthodoxies of this Board, your views will be distorted by those who either can't refute them or, more commonly, those who can't understand them.

 

Those who repeatedly accuse Woodlawn of arguing that prostitution is immoral - when he's done no such thing, and indeed, never even said anything indicative of such a belief - are attributing to him ideas he hasn't espoused because they can't refute the ideas he has espoused. It's really that simple - and it happens all the time here.

 

Devon put it best when he said (9-16-03):

>"woodlawn...manages to work that theme into practically every

>post he writes. I suppose (he'll) deny what is self-evident by

>demanding that I produce a quote that uses the exact words

>'immoral' or 'wrong,'... but you only need a passing

>familiarity with his posting history to notice that he is

>deeply disturbed by what he is doing and is on a never-ending

>mission to convince others of just how dirty and evil hiring

>escorts is."

 

Unlike Woodlawn's opinion of him, I like Devon and think that he's very smart and perceptive. And I remember when he wrote this. And it is just total bullshit.

 

Woodlawn frequently makes 3 separate points about prostitution which people often distort (either deliberately or out of a benign stupidity) into his saying that prostitution is immoral, even though none of the statements suggest any such thing:

 

(1) Woodlawn frequently points out the FACT that prostitution is considered to be immoral and undesirable by an overwhelming majority of the citizens of this country, as evidenced by the fact that it is illegal in virtually every square inch of the country;

 

(2) Woodlawn frequently points out the FACT that those who earn a living through prostitution are, by definition, people who are willing to disregard the laws and standards of our society in order to benefit themselves (a point he makes to show that it's somewhat silly to express shock that a prostitute, say,scams someone out of money or swipes a wallet, given that the prostitute is somoene who is, by defintion, someone willing to violate the law to make money; and,

 

(3) Woodlawn frequently points out that there ARE arguments that one can make in favor of anti-prostituiton laws that do not depend upon purely religious or moral beliefs, such as the belief that prostitution attracts an undesirable crowd to certain areas or that it spreads disease (a point he makes to illustrate that if you want to argue against anti-prostitution laws, you have to do more than make snide remarks about religious beliefs).

 

It is completely possible to believe any or all of these points - which are, almost in their entirety, totally irrefutable -- and ALSO believe for oneself that there is nothing whatsoever wrong with prostitution. There is nothing about ANY of those three beliefs that denotes or even implies a belief that prostitution is immoral.

 

It is fucking amazing to watch as EVERY SINGLE TIME Woodlawn posts one of those three points, hordes of people come along and shriek: "Hey Woodlawn, if you think prostitution is so wrong, why do you come here? You must hate yourself!," even though none of those statements has A FUCKING THING TO DO WITH one's own belief regarding the morality of prostitution one way or the other.

 

Don't they teach basic logic in school anymore?

 

One last thing, while I have you: I have seen several posts written by Woodlawn where he either expressly stated or made abundantly clear that he HAS, in fact, hired escorts before. So this notion that he refuses to say that he has is also false.

 

There are lots of valid and fun points one can use to attack Woodlawn. The "he self-hatingly thinks prostitution is wrong" line of attack is just inane, stupid and false - revelaingly, though, it's also, by far, the most popular one here.