Why Do So Many Escorts Label Themselves Bisexual?

[Guy Fawkes]

Relax, it's just skin. I'm sorry I just looked at the Rules and saw no subjects other than reviews that weren't up for discussion.

 

Can we stop talking about vaj**J** please? I am gay and the very thought of anything related to va***a totally grosses me out. Thank you.

[Yeahman]

Do you escorts also take women's appointment?

[Kippy]

The attached entire thread is dedicated to what would be perfect "bi" trade in a gay escort world. Str8 acting and appearing but willing to hook up with guys at least for a fee. The long term emotional solution for most of them is to land a woman and have kids (if they haven't already). Advertising as bi means there is no threshold for effeminate behavior or characteristics. This recent thread is the pictorial documentation of the type (if only they were all willing) http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/some-good-ol-boys.116068/

 

Peace,

 

Kipp

[+ Gar1eth]

The attached entire thread is dedicated to what would be perfect "bi" trade in a gay escort world. Str8 acting and appearing but willing to hook up with guys at least for a fee. The long term emotional solution for most of them is to land a woman and have kids (if they haven't already). Advertising as bi means there is no threshold for effeminate behavior or characteristics. This recent thread is the pictorial documentation of the type (if only they were all willing) http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/some-good-ol-boys.116068/

 

Peace,

 

Kipp

 

Actually I wouldn't like these guys. From your description they are more gay-for-pay than actually bi.

 

Gman

[jjkrkwood]

Actually I wouldn't like these guys. From your description they are more gay-for-pay than actually bi.

 

Gman

 

 

So I am sensing Gman that you believe a bi-labeled escort would provide a more intimate connection with you since by definition, bi actually implies guys that LIKE guys as well as girls , so there is the chance that the escort might actually really like you and enjoy himself with you rather than just seeing you as a stack of cash he's sticking his cock into ?

[+ José Soplanucas]

I am not questioning everyone's sexuality. What I am questioning, at times, is something that may be a marketing ploy. If truth were always told in ads, then Hooboy would never have needed to start either the Review Site or the Forum. In fact if ads were always 100% accurate, almost all of The Deli and much of the Ask An Escort Sections would be eliminated. I'm fine if you want to believe all ads 100% of the time. Please be fine with me if there are ads I have questions on.

 

G

I understand. I see the point of questioning fake or real pictures, and skills or likes that later you find out are not real. I do not see the point of questioning somebody's bisexuality. There is no way to prove it.

[+ Gar1eth]

Actually I wouldn't like these guys. From your description they are more gay-for-pay than actually bi.

 

Gman

 

So I am sensing Gman that you believe a bi-labeled escort would provide a more intimate connection with you since by definition, bi actually implies guys that LIKE guys as well as girls , so there is the chance that the escort might actually really like you and enjoy himself with you rather than just seeing you as a stack of cash he's sticking his cock into ?

 

I'm not saying bi guys would actually like me as a sexual partner. I'm not saying gay escorts would either. I just feel it's one less hurdle for the escort to overcome if their 'orientation' is already more guy-centric rather than having to overcome both situation A: ''I really am not into having sex with guys but will for money" and situation B: "I'm totally not into having sex with this old fat guy". A true bi guy or a gay escort only has to put up with B.

 

Another factor is that I can't imagine being able to have sex with a woman. And the idea of being with a guy who is really straight is uncomfortable for me.

 

Gman

[+ Gar1eth]

I understand. I see the point of questioning fake or real pictures, and skills or likes that later you find out are not real. I do not see the point of questioning somebody's bisexuality. There is no way to prove it.

 

The proof is in the pudding. Some guys will be honest enough, if you ask them, to tell you it's basically for marketing purposes-and they are either really straight or actually gay. Other guys you might be able to get a feeling for once you meet them or from their ad. Others you'll never know.

 

G

[+ José Soplanucas]

The proof is in the pudding. Some guys will be honest enough, if you ask them, to tell you it's basically for marketing purposes-and they are either really straight or actually gay. Other guys you might be able to get a feeling for once you meet them or from their ad. Others you'll never know.

 

G

Has this happened to you?

[Juan Vancouver]

Do you escorts also take women's appointment?

 

I like having sex with both men and women. For the longest time, however, I have not have a romantic relationship with a woman. I find men incredibly easier.

 

I used to take female clients, but a couple years ago I decided not to accept them anymore as clients. I am very used to the dynamic when working with men. Its easy, fun, there's no roles, there's not guessing, there's no convincing or having to "win" the right to be with them. Also, working with men is very rarely romantically complicated, whereas every single appointment that I have had with a single woman has ended up sooner or later in them wanting to pursue "a relationship" or at least getting romanced and pursued for free, demanding special treatment because "you felt it as well, right? we are special!".

 

The only way I will see women for work is if they come with a male partner who is also bisexual and only if both are wanting to play and interact with me. Those sessions are incredibly fun.

 

No more single women for me. Not for work.

 

Another factor is that I can't imagine being able to have sex with a woman.

 

Dude, I am sure there are many things you can't imagine yourself doing, yet those things are a reality and people purporting to do those things are not lying.

 

This sentence is the definition of close-minded. "I wouldn't, therefore I don't believe anyone honestly can!"

 

Guess what, an incredibly high percentage of the population fucking lust after women. They really, really, REALLY like it. Fine if you don't, but really, continuing to questions others based on how you feel about it is just tiresome.

 

The proof is in the pudding. Some guys will be honest enough, if you ask them, to tell you it's basically for marketing purposes-and they are either really straight or actually gay. Other guys you might be able to get a feeling for once you meet them or from their ad. Others you'll never know.

 

No, that's not a proof. That is just some poor sampling that confirms your bias, while you go right after and say that your bias seems to be only correct in a few instances.

 

Such obsession with wanting to put people in boxes! You can only do that with corpses. Live human beings are way more varied than that.

[+ Gar1eth]

Has this happened to you?

 

Yes. In the specific instance I'm thinking of the escort admitted he was basically straight. It was not an incredibly fun experience.

 

G

[MikeBiDude]

Yes. In the specific instance I'm thinking of the escort admitted he was basically straight. It was not an incredibly fun experience.

 

G

But, but...."it was not an incredibly fun experience" happens with self proclaimed gay escorts too!!

[+ Gar1eth]

But, but...."it was not an incredibly fun experience" happens with self proclaimed gay escorts too!!

 

On a percentage basis, I've had more fun with gay escorts.

 

Guys, Forum Brothers (and Sisters), I've accepted that many of you don't agree with my stance regarding human sexuality/attraction. I think there are probably some who do. That's fine. I don't agree with the suppositions that A) as long as an escort performs well, it doesn't matter what their actual attraction is, that B) in most cases claiming bisexuality is the actual truth and not a marketing ploy-especially with escorts who are tops only and not into kissing, and that C) it's not a question that should even be asked as there's no way to tell. But much like posts in the Political Section on the Forum, the odds are very slim that we are going to change each other's minds.

 

I will admit that after reading discussions on the Forum, I have in the past occasionally changed my opinion. But it's not going to happen on this subject at this time. I think I've exhausted my current thoughts on this subject. While I may or may not comment on or introduce other subjects on the Forum tonight, I am bidding this topic adieu. And furthermore I am hoping that flights of angels sing it to its rest.

 

I remain yours in cordiality.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Gman

[+ sf westcoaster]

A term that I have seen lately is "pansexual"

[+ SundayZip]

Hey Juan... What's with you being all thoughtful and intelligent in your posts? I thought Latin men were all machismo and basically walking sex objects. Where'd all the wisdom come from? I'm sooo confused. Same goes for you latbear4blk.

[+ José Soplanucas]

Hey Juan... What's with you being all thoughtful and intelligent in your posts? I thought Latin men were all machismo and basically walking sex objects. Where'd all the wisdom come from? I'm sooo confused. Same goes for you latbear4blk.

 

Excuse me, I am just a sexual object. A very big and hairy one.

[marylander1940]

Is it because bisexual individuals being attracted to more genders are more free sexually and so more likely to be attracted to escorting, or is it more of a marketing strategy to say you are bisexual and appeal to more clients?

 

And would you think that most of these escorts are significantly bisexual in their private lives or mainly attracted to one gender?

 

Gman

 

I guess it's because they're trying to sell themselves as masculine and some folks on here have an attraction to guys who also like women. I'm sure there are some guys who are truly bi but I think in many cases it's nothing but a way to promote themselves as not just gay...

 

I don't hire guys who call themselves straight because I like the BFE and I'm not interested in hiring someone who's thinking of pussy while having sex with me wishing everything was done soon.

 

To each his own.

[marylander1940]

Hey Juan... What's with you being all thoughtful and intelligent in your posts? I thought Latin men were all machismo and basically walking sex objects. Where'd all the wisdom come from? I'm sooo confused. Same goes for you latbear4blk.

 

Wow... was that sarcasm?

 

All Irish are drunk, Jews are cheap, Muslims are all therrorists, Italians are lazy, Polish dumb, what's next?

[marylander1940]

Didn't we already have this discussion? It only seems like yesterday....

 

 

 

Yes. Because I attract both male and female clientele, normally as a couple.

 

 

 

http://i.giphy.com/8JVjMCr3OIAhO.gif

http://i.giphy.com/hm6IVcHwuG92g.gif

http://i.giphy.com/rBxBit7yxzcIM.gif

 

How often do you get hire by women or by male/female couples?

[+ José Soplanucas]

I guess it's because they're trying to sell themselves as masculine and some folks on here have an attraction to guys who also like women. I'm sure there are some guys who are truly bi but I think in many cases it's nothing but a way to promote themselves as not just gay...

 

I don't hire guys who call themselves straight because I like the BFE and I'm not interested in hiring someone who's thinking of pussy while having sex with me wishing everything was done soon.

 

To each his own.

No, it is not to each his own. Not when each is insisting in projecting his own limitations to others, labeling and judging. But I quit, this is like explaining White supremacy to an unwilling to questions himself White, or the imperialism behind the idea of American exceptionalism to an American unwilling to get in other people shoes.

[marylander1940]

No, it is not to each his own. Not when each is insisting in projecting his own limitations to others, labeling and judging. But I quit, this is like explaining White supremacy to an unwilling to questions himself White, or the imperialism behind the idea of American exceptionalism to an American unwilling to get in other people shoes.

 

I think you're quoting/barking at the wrong tree.

 

Could you please post who is the EACH in question?

 

Is it the OP? If yes, please quote him so he can reply.

[marylander1940]

Ahh but in my case, I am only gay. So the common classification system models my reality.

 

G

 

you're a gay top, let's be more accurate.

[Juan Vancouver]

Hey Juan... What's with you being all thoughtful and intelligent in your posts? I thought Latin men were all machismo and basically walking sex objects. Where'd all the wisdom come from? I'm sooo confused. Same goes for you latbear4blk.

 

You totally had me pegged, meester! I am actually really stupid and judgemental but (as a very clever white man in this forum pointed out years ago) I found a caucasian man, you know, someone who can think deep thoughts and shit to write my stuff for me.

 

But have you seen my dark fat uncut cock? I am also amazing at gardening!

 

And thanks for the compliment. I will pass it on to my ghost writer (while I pay his writing services fucking his lilly white ass).

Edited August 4, 2016 by Juan Vancouver

[Juan Vancouver]

No, it is not to each his own. Not when each is insisting in projecting his own limitations to others, labeling and judging. But I quit, this is like explaining White supremacy to an unwilling to questions himself White, or the imperialism behind the idea of American exceptionalism to an American unwilling to get in other people shoes.

 

Yeah, this is not a matter of each own having their own experience and respecting each other's experiences. This is about someone projecting on to others their own limited view of the world, and then painting everyone who doesn't conform to that limited view with the scathing wide brush of mendacity.

 

It's perfectly Okay to believe that if you dance on Sundays the devil will subject you to an endless punishment of brimstone. It's perfectly fine if you live in congruency with your belief. Do not fucking dance.

 

What is not okay is to insist that others are stupid and will burn forever. What is not okay is trying to force others to change their ways because of your personal belief.

 

Don't want to dance on Sunday? I don't give a shit. Power to you! I will bloody dance whenever the fuck I feel like doing it.

[+ SundayZip]

Wow... was that sarcasm?

 

It was my rather silly (and probably stupid) way of complimenting Juan and latbear4blk for their posts and supporting their position. It may have also been an expression of lust for Juan.