Noah Driver review today

[+ Charlie]

The way I read it, this seems to be a review of a no-show, which I thought was not allowed. The reviewer claims to have hired Noah before, but he is a first-time reviewer, so it can't be claimed that this is an addendum to a review of a previous meeting, since there is no previous review. What is the story?

 

(I am aware that Noah has a questionable reputation on this board already.)

[down_to_business]

At Daddy's discretion he will publish a no show review if he feels the merits of the case warrant it. This has been the policy for as far back as I can remember.

[LADoug1]

I think it is essential that, with Daddy's discretion, reviews like this get published. I see that rating has been left blank. Also I wonder if Daddy reached out to Noah for his response.

[AdamSmith]

Note that Noah's Review #18 of 11/09/2010 was also a no-show.

[jjkrkwood]

Note that Noah's Review #18 of 11/09/2010 was also a no-show.

 

 

Well if everything in between 2010 and present was good, the guy is allowed a no-show if just cause.

[+ WmClarke]

Well if everything in between 2010 and present was good, the guy is allowed a no-show if just cause.

We have no idea how many no shows Noah did in that time frame. Could be zero, could be hundreds. And a lot of clients don't even know about this review site.

 

These are also no shows where the client pre-paid. Foolish of them, especially in hindsight.

 

If he was going good work, he'd have more reviews in that time span which sing his praises. The absence of reviews says something.

[caliguy]

Wow. Very impressive. This guys deserves an award for scamming people with his BS over and over.

 

He should run as a Republican President one day. He's got the right stuff.

[jjkrkwood]

We have no idea how many no shows Noah did in that time frame. Could be zero, could be hundreds. And a lot of clients don't even know about this review site.

 

These are also no shows where the client pre-paid. Foolish of them, especially in hindsight.

 

If he was going good work, he'd have more reviews in that time span which sing his praises. The absence of reviews says something.

 

WC, my memory often fails me these days but I recollect this guy being discussed rather negatively here in the past, and left for awhile but then reappeared about a year ago and tried to atone, saying he would pay back all his previous financial victims.... Yes I remember now... You must excuse my aging mind, and my previous comment to give him a "pass"

[caliguy]

Note that Noah's Review #18 of 11/09/2010 was also a no-show.

Don't forget Review #17

[Samfoslom]

it's pertinent that he asked for prepays twice and stopped answering communications after not showing up. I don't see that as excusable, unless we learn later that he was hit by a bus or something that would reasonably explain radio silence after taking the money and failing to show up.

[mattr]

The guy is a thief praying on kind men who trusted and wanted to help him.

[+ azdr0710]

Also I wonder if Daddy reached out to Noah for his response.

 

Daddy typically goes to great pains to allow escorts a rebuttal.....I presume he offered Noah a chance or three.....

[Flynn]

Is this review to be believed? He always provided well for me.

[+ WilliamM]

It's pertinent that he asked for prepays twice and stopped answering communications after not showing up. I don't see that as excusable, unless we learn later that he was hit by a bus or something that would reasonably explain radio silence after taking the money and failing to show

 

It seems that dang bus is forever following Noah causing him to miss appointments.

 

At least, poor Noah is getting paid anyway for not showing up, or offering an explanation or rescheduling.

[caliguy]

Is this review to be believed? He always provided well for me.

Seems everyone else says the same thing. It's that paying in advance that's the stickler for him.

 

You guys get together. You hit it off. He calls you down the road with a can you help a buddy out and I'll be on the first plane. Then it's sudden amnesia.

 

I used to have friends like that.

[+ WmClarke]

WC, my memory often fails me these days but I recollect this guy being discussed rather negatively here in the past, and left for awhile but then reappeared about a year ago and tried to atone, saying he would pay back all his previous financial victims.... Yes I remember now... You must excuse my aging mind, and my previous comment to give him a "pass"

That's right! He did pay one person back but others (or at least one other) never got anything.

[Tigger]

Is this review to be believed? He always provided well for me.

 

I'm not saying you are wrong @Flynn. I'm just going to throw this out there for others to decide about. Out of your 19 posts on this Forum, 8 of them have mentioned Noah.

[bigvalboy]

Well Noah is a lot of things, and his reputation certainly precedes him, so why anyone in their right mind would front him money, not once but twice, for any reason is difficult to believe.

[AdamSmith]

why anyone in their right mind

[gallahadesquire]

The way I read it, this seems to be a review of a no-show, which I thought was not allowed. The reviewer claims to have hired Noah before, but he is a first-time reviewer, so it can't be claimed that this is an addendum to a review of a previous meeting, since there is no previous review. What is the story?

 

(I am aware that Noah has a questionable reputation on this board already.)

 

Not entirely a "no-show" review, as the Unsub [scottyboyD, the author of the review in question] did say he'd seen him before.

Perhaps we should think of this review as more of a Public Service Announcement.

 

This reminds me of a certain Orlando escort who isn't quite this much of a scammer, but close. PM me for information.

[+ dutchmuch]

Perhaps our Defender of Disgraced Escorts will chime in???

[OneFinger]

ScottyboyD is a first time reviewer and I tend to be skeptical over negative reviews from a "newbie". However, his experience is very consistent with other experiences I read in reviews and in the forums.

 

I'm very grateful Daddy posted this latest review. I doubt he would have done it without some verification. Like dutchmuch, I'd love to see a response. But, until that happens, we've all been warned.

[essjay]

No surprise to me that he has pulled this again. Thankfully this site provides a great forum to keep people informed of the good and the bad.

[+ Charlie]

I don't believe that the review is inaccurate. I have no horse in this race, since I don't know Noah Driver or have any personal interest in him. I was just surprised that this no-show review by a first-time reviewer was published, because this is the first exception to the usual policy that I can ever remember reading (which certainly doesn't mean that it has never happened before).

[coriolis888]

I don't believe that the review is inaccurate. I have no horse in this race, since I don't know Noah Driver or have any personal interest in him. I was just surprised that this no-show review by a first-time reviewer was published, because this is the first exception to the usual policy that I can ever remember reading (which certainly doesn't mean that it has never happened before).

 

I don't read the review as an ordinary "no show" because the reviewer stated that he had met with Noah previously.

 

Had the review been solely a "no show" then I would agree that the tradition was broken.

 

The reviewer met with Noah and for a subsequent meeting, had advanced Noah funds which resulted in Noah breaching the agreement.

 

Clearly, the review will help many potential future clients from a similar scam.