Jump to content

$1600/hr.....


mattr
This topic is 2858 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hello??? Brodie Sinclair???? I say we group together and give Brodie a blanket party.

Hi my name is Brodie Sinclair everyone says I look like the actor Mark Wahlberg I'

http://m4m-forum.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/

 

(And there are many more if you type in "Sinclair" in Daddy's search function)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello??? Brodie Sinclair???? I say we group together and give Brodie a blanket party.

Hi my name is Brodie Sinclair everyone says I look like the actor Mark Wahlberg I'

http://m4m-forum.org/threads/does-rm-have-a-responsibility-to-block-ads-from-people-like-brodie-sinclair.110665/

 

(And there are many more if you type in "Sinclair" in Daddy's search function)

Maybe we should have a "sticky" about him and save ourselves a lot of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's charging bargain basement prices now. When I stumbled onto his ad a day or two ago it was $2500 for an hour outcall. Better snatch him up before he's all booked up. He makes the saying "you get what you pay for" sound like the biggest bunch of BS you can imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He certainly appears to be batshit crazy, so I would never hire him (even at a reasonable rate) but...those lips. I would really, really, really like to know what they feel like. :mad::mad:

 

Other than the outing incident, and the general craziness, has anyone in the forum ever actually hired him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the problem. He is trying for the ultimate high end client market. I feel sorry for the men he'll be suing in the future or outing to their wives and children in a blackmail attempt. I'm sure he's still looking for that client who can make the courts find for him against his landlord. Oh, the horror!!!

 

TruHart1 :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to figure this guy out is like trying to figure out gay Republicans. It's a mystery wrapped in an enigma that will never be unraveled. If he just didn't have such beautiful lips dammit!!

 

(To you Log Cabin boys. I'm teasing! You're just a garden variety mystery. :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one thinks it could be a mistake and some way an extra zero shows in his rates?

Years ago when he was just a porn newbie he was already asking INSANE rates 800 plus an hr etc. Guess he feels his 15mins of fame (already up) warrants an even MORE insane hourly quote. Or maybe his own delusional insanity makes him think he's worth it???o_O *If you think about it ALL he needs is ONE schmuck willing to pay that during his stay and it's the SAME as seeing 8 diff clients at a 300$ rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for those who may have NOT read about this case previously, here is an article which explains what happened to the Condé Nast CFO and about the follow up suit brought by Sinclair in November against him and the company!

https://thestyleofthecase.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/conde-nast-sued-for-5m-over-gawkers-gay-escort-story/

 

It should seem apparent that any high end client might have to contend with this kind of experience should they make Brodie Sinclair dissatisfied in any way if they decide to hire him!

 

TruHart1 :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links, TruHart1 and Kurtis, and for not mentioning names in your posts. The target of Sinclair's wrath has had his name splashed over the internet enough. No need to mention him or make him easily identifiable here.

 

That Sinclair is suing him for defamation (apparently for saying he didn't know who Sinclair was, so Sinclair was trying to extort him) rather than him suing Sinclair (though even if untrue, that would only keep the story going, but I believe Gawker when they said they did their due diligence) is just the icing on an unappetizing cake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...