Has anyone here ever had a massage like this?

[+ sync]

I’m curious to know if anyone here has experienced the massage technique executed in the video at this link: http://manporn.xxx/videos/3071450/filipino-massage/ (specifically, the technique beginning at 25:00 in the video).

 

If I ever did, I’m sure I would spontaneously combust!

[corndog]

As sensual/erotic massages go, I'd rate that one a 4 on a scale of 1 to 10.

 

The TV on in the background was really tacky... there should have been calming, mood-setting music. The masseur seemed distracted and disconnected from the client. The sensuality didn't slowly build; the beginning of the massage seemed cold and mechanical, and then the sensual part seemed to come out of nowhere without any real sensual energy. There was nothing mutual about the experience, and the masseur never even removed his shorts.

 

In summary, I think you could easily find a hotter massage experience on massagem4m.com or masseurfinder.com in just about any mid- to large american city. It's surprising to me that someone bothered to film something so mediocre.

[+ sync]

Corndog,

Thank you for your feedback. You make some interesting points, but I'm thinking that your requirements skew more toward an escort than a masseur. Also, do you happen to have any specific names or links to masseurs in NYC who meet your criteria?

[corndog]

... but I'm thinking that your requirements skew more toward an escort than a masseur. Also, do you happen to have any specific names or links to masseurs in NYC who meet your criteria?

Even for the most legitimate, therapeutic massage, the distraction of the TV in the background is unacceptable. Relaxing music and a calming environment are standard elements of any decent massage. And, the masseur's full, undivided attention is a basic expectation.

 

Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with the NYC market, but if the massage in the video seemed hot to you, I think you'll have no trouble finding that level of service from any well-reviewed masseur who offers "sensual" massage. Things don't tend to approach the escort realm until you look at "erotic" or "custom" massage on massagem4m.com or masseurfinder.com. I'm sure that some other members here can offer suggestions for NYC.

[Rudynate]

When I'm in the mood to hire, I'm sometimes torn between erotic massage and escort. Erotic massage is way simpler, cheaper, and I really enjoy laying back and watching a studly man work all my kinks out. I have a regular guy I go to, who is one of the best massage practitioners ever, for 2-hour sessions. I feel completely enveloped and taken care of whenever I go see him - a sweet, gentle personality and muscles for days.

[Lewis H]

As sensual/erotic massages go, I'd rate that one a 4 on a scale of 1 to 10.

 

The TV on in the background was really tacky... there should have been calming, mood-setting music. The masseur seemed distracted and disconnected from the client. The sensuality didn't slowly build; the beginning of the massage seemed cold and mechanical, and then the sensual part seemed to come out of nowhere without any real sensual energy. There was nothing mutual about the experience, and the masseur never even removed his shorts.

 

In summary, I think you could easily find a hotter massage experience on massagem4m.com or masseurfinder.com in just about any mid- to large american city. It's surprising to me that someone bothered to film something so mediocre.

 

Considering the black square over the client's face, as well as the prominent photo of the 'masseur' (and I use that term loosely) at the beginning of the film, I'd say this was a video the masseur shot to promote his business, perhaps without the client's consent.

 

And I completely agree, this was a terrible massage experience, and the masseur's quick jerk away from the client when the client reached out was very jarring. If I were the client, I'd be insulted. Granted, the masseur obviously has his boundaries (including underwear) but there are gentler ways of maintaining a sense of eroticism without that level of rejection in his body language. I've been with masseurs who didn't necessarily offer mutual touch, but when engaged, gently moved my hand away. The masseur leapt away like the client was a leper. Of course, considering the very distracting tv in the background, setting a gentle, relaxing experience wasn't necessarily in the game plan.

 

Corndog,

Thank you for your feedback. You make some interesting points, but I'm thinking that your requirements skew more toward an escort than a masseur. Also, do you happen to have any specific names or links to masseurs in NYC who meet your criteria?

 

I think that the masseur's oral ministrations in the video here is more escort level than most sensual masseurs I've seen. Generally the sensual massages I've had were more manual, but with more technique involved to heighten the sensuality.

[maninsoma]

I've had so many different experiences with masseurs who advertised as "sensual" or "erotic" that I've come to the conclusion that those terms don't mean much. Though it's rare, I've had masseurs go down on me. Less rare is masseurs offering their cocks for me to suck while I jerk myself off. Some guys have made out with me, though this is also relatively rare. Even more rare -- but highly exciting -- have been the guys who fucked me or let me fuck them. For the majority, I'd say that the erotic portion of the massage is simply a manual release with mutual touching. Even that hasn't been delivered 100% of the time, though. Perhaps the guys for whom erotic meant nothing more than them being in their underwear were simply scammers (charging higher rates than are reasonable for strictly therapeutic massages), or perhaps other clients were treated differently then me.

 

I think the one thing we can all agree about is that the TV on in the background is an indication that this masseur provides poor service. As to the rest of his technique, I have to say that, yes, I have had a massage that was mediocre from a therapeutic standpoint that was then followed up by a not very erotic attempt to get me off. I hate massages like that and I usually end up ending the massage before I get off simply because I cannot get truly excited when I can tell there's absolutely no pleasure on the masseur's part (or, worse yet, I detect contempt coming from him).

[adriano46]

Have had on a number of occasions this "type" of massage (in NYC, in DC, in Chicago, and in Las Vegas to name a few places) but definitely without the TV noise; each case had suitable soft music and lighting, and a nice finale like here (and yes these would be for those masseurs who advertise as "sensual" or now "custom". But like Maninsoma, I generally do NOT seek a happy ending (I am way too relaxed with a good professional masseur) to get it up at the end; More often than not, I am so relaxed I can barely sit up when it is done. Now on the rare occasions I hire a guy for a sexy massage, then he and I make sure to cut to the chase after about 30 minutes, and I am more alert (and more frisky) in anticipation.

[Diverdan]

I agree with most of the comments above... the TV is a HUGE distraction, apparently for both the masseur and th client. Very mechanical and apparently no "connection" between the two. Finding a really good massage with sensual or erotic elements is difficult, but when it works it is fantastic !!

[Lewis H]

...I cannot get truly excited when I can tell there's absolutely no pleasure on the masseur's part (or, worse yet, I detect contempt coming from him).

 

Contempt does seem to sum up the way I feel that this Filipino masseur jerks away from the client.