411 on Jake in Los Angeles

[kaboom35]

Anyone have anything to add about Jake from L.A. Reviews all seem good but for some reason i'm still hesitant. Anyone who's been with him care to share?

 

http://www.rentboy.com/ListingPopup.aspx?lid=313168&preview=1

 

Thanks!

[Strafe13]

Anyone have anything to add about Jake from L.A. Reviews all seem good but for some reason i'm still hesitant. Anyone who's been with him care to share?

 

http://www.rentboy.com/ListingPopup.aspx?lid=313168&preview=1

 

Thanks!

 

I've been intrigued by him for a while. But the fact that all of his reviews (at least the last time I checked) were by first time reviewers gave me pause. If any longtime reviewers or forum posters had positive feedback on him, that would help, but I don't recall any such discussion on the forum. If you hire him, I hope you have a great time.

[kaboom35]

Hmm...ok. Well if anyone has anything to add that would be great! I'm sure within the next couple of months or so I might just give in eventually though

[TUOT89]

Your instincts are right on this one... Too many first person reviews, too many reviews that sound the same, no mention in his rentboy ad of what he will do...

[andyman]

A bit of a novice on the Forum. I have written a few reviews but unfortunately, never written one for Jake for our dinner appointment while I was in LA.

 

He is utterly amazing. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to anyone. He is well educated, comes from a military background, and a perfect gentleman. He has this Midwest, humble, "aw-shucks" charm. We had a fantastic meal at Nobu (he loves sushi) and was so much fun. Back at my hotel after dinner, it was explosive sex. He kisses like a champ and topped me with passion. I don't know how else to vouch for him other than to sing my genuine praises for him. In his case, the use of superlatives is highly appropriate.

[Guest Fraud Account]

Andyman_tx: A friend suggested I check out this thread and I was compelled to join temporarily to thank you for that fun evening and the sushi tasting menu at Nobu - I remember you well. And thank you for the affirming remarks, though most comments by the others here are correct (I'm fairly certain my last 3 reviews were indeed written by the same client seen on multiple occasions and I've been overextended with school and unable to take many new clients). Next time you're in LA however let me know so I can make time to express my gratitude to you for being an exceptionally kind person. Very best, xx, Jake

[cooldemo03]

Andyman_tx: A friend suggested I check out this thread and I was compelled to join temporarily to thank you for that fun evening and the sushi tasting menu at Nobu - I remember you well. And thank you for the affirming remarks, though most comments by the others here are correct (I'm fairly certain my last 3 reviews were indeed written by the same client seen on multiple occasions and I've been overextended with school and unable to take many new clients). Next time you're in LA however let me know so I can make time to express my gratitude to you for being an exceptionally kind person. Very best, xx, Jake

 

I've been considering him too, but yea the reviews seem too similar. And now we have someone claiming to be Jake who comes on for one post just to further advertise? Hmm.

[Bart]

I also tried to set up an appt. with Jake during his end of school year and had to be turned down. He was very prompt and that is all one can ask. I will say to Jridge that Jake's post sounds logical as it is a rare occurrence when I see or talk to a gentleman and he has knowledge of this forum. Some I have found do not even know they have reviews and those that do many have never looked at the forum. I did not find his response as advertising but merely acknowledging there was a thread about him but that in itself is advocating for one's self. As to the reviews being similar, I think if Daddy felt there was issue he would insert the review with our "favorite fingers pinched to nose" label. None of this proves one way or the other how good or bad an escort Jake is but there has been nothing that detracts from hiring him at this point.

[Okliehomo]

And we wonder why most escorts don't post here?

 

You know, there is a chance that Jake came on here just to thank his client for the kind words and to explain the similarities in his reviews. I thought he sounded sincere and that it was a classy thing to do.

[Kenny]

Actually the instincts are wrong. I've been with Jake a couple of times, and he's terrific sex. Great guy.

Your instincts are right on this one... Too many first person reviews, too many reviews that sound the same, no mention in his rentboy ad of what he will do...

[TUOT89]

Actually the instincts are wrong. I've been with Jake a couple of times, and he's terrific sex. Great guy.

 

Good for you.

 

I never said I met the guy. My instincts were going to be right or wrong.

[kaboom35]

I started this thread so I figured I will let everyone know that I did finally meet up with Jake and he is amazing! I had a very hot time with him.

[jawjateck]

Congrats kaboom. Jake looks mighty fine.

[+ goosh69]

I saw him this summer. Amazing. Early 30s now, but masculine and really, really good. The reviews are accurate.

[+ goosh69]

I've been considering him too, but yea the reviews seem too similar. And now we have someone claiming to be Jake who comes on for one post just to further advertise? Hmm.

I am a real person. Look through my comment history. I have never written about Jake. Most of my comments are snarky, negative ones. Jake is the real deal. ANd yes he does come on this forum.

[rvwnsd]

I've been intrigued by him for a while. But the fact that all of his reviews (at least the last time I checked) were by first time reviewers gave me pause. If any longtime reviewers or forum posters had positive feedback on him, that would help, but I don't recall any such discussion on the forum. If you hire him, I hope you have a great time.

 

You might want to take a second look at Jake's reviews. As of the date of his last review (3/6/2014) five of his eleven reviews were from reviewers that have reviewed before, Here is the breakdown:

 

 

• First-time reviewer: 6
  
• Second review: 1
  
• Third review: 3
  
• Fourth review: 1
  

 

In fact, his first three reviews were from guys who had posted three reviews.

[Strafe13]

You might want to take a second look at Jake's reviews. As of the date of his last review (3/6/2014) five of his eleven reviews were from reviewers that have reviewed before, Here is the breakdown:

 

 

• First-time reviewer: 6
  
• Second review: 1
  
• Third review: 3
  
• Fourth review: 1
  

 

In fact, his first three reviews were from guys who had posted three reviews.

 

Right you are, rvwnsd. All the more reason to get over my initial reluctance/shyness, and give the man a call the next time I'm in L.A. He seems so much like my type, anyway... I should have called him months ago.

[+ Gar1eth]

You might want to take a second look at Jake's reviews. As of the date of his last review (3/6/2014) five of his eleven reviews were from reviewers that have reviewed before, Here is the breakdown:

 

 

• First-time reviewer: 6
  
• Second review: 1
  
• Third review: 3
  
• Fourth review: 1
  

 

In fact, his first three reviews were from guys who had posted three reviews.

 

I'm asking this question publicly so we can all learn. I know Daddy checks the reviews in general. But I was wondering if Daddy 'vets' the portion of the review where the reviewer states how many previous reviews he has written.

 

I also have noticed that years ago- most multiple reviewers listed the escorts named in their previous reviews ( there's a place on the review form for members who haven't submitted reviews), but for several years now- that happens very infrequently.

 

Gman

[+ deej]

I'm asking this question publicly so we can all learn. I know Daddy checks the reviews in general. But I was wondering if Daddy 'vets' the portion of the review where the reviewer states how many previous reviews he has written.

 

I also have noticed that years ago- most multiple reviewers listed the escorts named in their previous reviews ( there's a place on the review form for members who haven't submitted reviews), but for several years now- that happens very infrequently.

 

You've been here long enough to know that Daddy does not discuss reviews or review policy on the MC.

 

Write to daddy@daddysreviews.com.

 

[+ Gar1eth]

You've been here long enough to know that Daddy does not discuss reviews or review policy on the MC.

 

Write to daddy@daddysreviews.com.

 

 

Actually, I didn't know that. But thank you for letting me know.

 

Gman

[Steven_Draker]

I'm asking this question publicly so we can all learn. I know Daddy checks the reviews in general. But I was wondering if Daddy 'vets' the portion of the review where the reviewer states how many previous reviews he has written.

 

I also have noticed that years ago- most multiple reviewers listed the escorts named in their previous reviews ( there's a place on the review form for members who haven't submitted reviews), but for several years now- that happens very infrequently.

 

That's history.

 

Hooboy did it back in the day: the reviewer included the number of reviews he has written with LINKS to those reviews in question. Daddy dropped the links, because it was heavily time-consuming.

 

To respond your question: there's no guarantee that if a reviewer says he has written 3 or 6 reviews, he actually did so. You need to do your own research and find the "alleged" reviews.

 

Here is how to perform a search.

[swallows22]

Reviewed JLA in 08. Still posted. Absolutely brilliant, Then it went down hill. Could not confirm an appointment. One day, it was on. Then the call came that he could not make it.

 

Re-booked and then was cancelled or postponed, In a nutshell, I gave up after a year.

 

Why put up with that crap when Kristian/Hagen/Todd Dillon were much more helpful. And just as good, if not better.

[+ goosh69]

It took me almost two years to book him. Also. I won't go into his personal life other than to say he has a VERY busy "real life", and if you heard why, you'd get it. And when I did see him, he had to cancel on someone else because he assumed I wanted an hour when I really wanted two. So time management and free time are things he lacked.

 

But boy oh boy was he worth it when we actually met.

[rvwnsd]

Reviewed JLA in 08. Still posted. Absolutely brilliant, Then it went down hill. Could not confirm an appointment. One day, it was on. Then the call came that he could not make it.

 

Re-booked and then was cancelled or postponed, In a nutshell, I gave up after a year.

 

Why put up with that crap when Kristian/Hagen/Todd Dillon were much more helpful. And just as good, if not better.

 

It is good to know that JLA has had reliability problems, but this thread is about a different escort who goes by "Jake." If you look for him on Daddy's, he is "Jake #3" in LA. I agree that Todd Dillon was a fabulous escort. I'm still bummed that he retired. If anyone hears that he is back escorting, please let me know.

 

You might want to take a second look at Jake's reviews. As of the date of his last review (3/6/2014) five of his eleven reviews were from reviewers that have reviewed before, Here is the breakdown:

 

 

• First-time reviewer: 6
  
• Second review: 1
  
• Third review: 3
  
• Fourth review: 1
  

 

In fact, his first three reviews were from guys who had posted three reviews.

 

Since I posted the tally of reviewers and the number of stated reviews, I went back and searched for the reviewers' pervious reviews. Here are the results:

 

 

• Reviewer 12: First review, as stated
  
• Reviewers 11, 10, and 9: Jake stated he thought they were all written by the same over exuberant client; no point in searching
  
• Reviewer 8: First review, as stated; has posted a review since reviewing Jake
  
• Reviewer 7: First review, as stated
  
• Reviewer 6: First review, as stated; has posted two reviews since reviewing Jake
  
• Reviewer 5: Stated fourth review, google search only revealed one review, but googling the reviewer's description revealed one additional review under a different handle that stated it was his third
  
• Reviewer 4: First review, as stated
  
• Reviewer 3: Third review, as stated
  
• Reviewer 2: Stated third review, google search revealed one other review, which he stated was his first. Perhaps he mis-counted
  
• Reviewer 1: Stated third review, looks like it might actually be his second, but he has posted several reviews since then
  

 

Although the exact count might be a bit off, I stand by my original point that Jake has been reviewed by experienced reviewers. In addition, two of his reviewers have gone on to review other escorts, which would lead me to believe they are legitimate.

[newdad]

I started this thread so I figured I will let everyone know that I did finally meet up with Jake and he is amazing! I had a very hot time with him.

 

Hi kaboom35, how was the meeting with Jake? Was he the same as in pictures? I emailed/texted him but I have yet to hear a response, and have yet to see his face pics. Feel free to PM me if you'd like.