Suck this COCK 2!

[RockHard]

So you think you can spot the photo fakes and all those enhanced body parts? Well, good luck. Try and find the 10 fixes that have been added, subtracted, or altered from the original photo on the right. Winners receive a very special photo of blond, uncut cock meat from RH's private collection. A tribute to my buddy, Lucky.

 

Oh yeah, the cock and balls were retouched (ya think?). They don't count as 1 and 2 on this go round. And the watermark in the pubic hair does not count as 3. Good luck trying to find the 10 beyond that. May the best cock watcher WIN!

 

Please note: If you own editing software, it is unfair for you to participate and spoil the fun. If you enjoy spoiling fun for others and insist on posting your findings to this thread, then I hope you enjoy the classification of douche-bag asshole.

 

Everyone else, have fun! After all, it's summertime.

 

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8431/7558194572_6c7044717d_b.jpg

[+ azdr0710]

if, as before, the left one is the 'shopped one...........

 

right hand pinky removed

greenery outside under his left side removed

something (what is that?) under his right armpit removed

butt made more bubbly

right shoulder lifted

something outside above his left shoulder removed

wrinkles in his left armpit removed

 

I don't have fancy photoshop what-have-you software, so that's it for me....

[gallahadesquire]

bottom of curtain below his right hand

black area under his left eye is lightene

 

in addition to all the above: I do believe that makes nine.

[+ azdr0710]

thanks, gallahad....I think two of your four are new, so we're looking for that final alteration....

[Boner]

Please note: If you own editing software, it is unfair for you to participate and spoil the fun. If you enjoy spoiling fun for others and insist on posting your findings to this thread, then I hope you enjoy the classification of douche-bag asshole.

 

It's OK to change the rules the second time around RH - but let's not pout now, and here, because you invited others to partake in the skill-set of forensic examination in your first go-around of hide the truth.

I gave thought to members having access to editing software. Hence, the decision to add watermarks and use them as a test for the benefit of other escorts.

 

Some of us passed that test better than you had expected and it's a good thing to get rid of that annoying and inconvenient little tool this go around. Congratulations, for once again, moving so fast.

 

Imagine this. A BelAmi boy being in someone's private collection. How positively rare could that possibly be?

 

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8431/7558194572_6c7044717d_b.jpg

[RockHard]

your first go-around of hide the truth.

 

Are you talking about your former usernames?

 

I have no desire to engage further with a troll.

[+ Lucky]

Are you talking about your former usernames?

 

I have no desire to engage further with a troll.

 

Hehehe

[RockHard]

I mean, really.

 

Hehehe

 

Didn't I write that Cock 2 was a "tribute to my buddy, Lucky?" What kind of troll is she if she doesn't remember your fondness for Dolph? Well, I like Dolph, too. And I prefer his au naturel cock, even though I enjoy throwing an occasional large, uncut bone to my size-queen fans.

[+ purplekow]

Seems his right pec is larger and his lips look a bit fuller to me but not sure on that

[Boner]

 

I have no desire to engage further with a troll.

 

Yet, you do. And I am not a troll. The honest fact, RH, is that you have egg all over your face from your first once-fun thread about photo-shopping models. It was fun. Many people enjoyed it - including myself. Right up to the point where you decided to lie about the infamous @RH watermark being the one alteration nobody could find - only to then deny all participants the coveted prize of a RH private gallery male-nude. Oh, the loss!

 

The reason nobody could find it, was because it was never there in the first place. You know it. I know it. Yet, instead of manning-up over it, you regress into calling me a troll, to cover-up your dishonesty. You delete your comment about someone needing high-end monitors and high-end editing software, after you learn that I have exactly that - to make me look like some kind of troll, out to get you.

 

If anyone is a troll here, RH - you certainly have not been speaking to them here today.

 

Even though, the hehehe's are quite revealing.

 

Just man-up and move on. It will do your conscience good.

[Boner]

And by the way...I don't think that George Duroy would be real pleased, by anyone, claiming one of his copyright protected images being claimed to belong to anyone's private collection, other than his - let alone Photoshopped under that guise for personal purposes.

[RockHard]

What a boner.

 

Boner, I suggest you look up the definition of a troll. That is you. You're behaving like an ass. So what else is new on this board.

 

I don't lie, so spare me your fantasy accusations because that egg won't stick. Anyone who really knows Photoshop knows that when you use "Save For Web and Devices" on a JPEG, the resulting JPEG endures further deterioration. If you decrease the Image Quality slider in the Save For Web dialogue box, to save on bandwidth for Daddy, you experience even more pixel destruction.

 

I have the original file, so naturally all my images in the Cock 1 thread are much clearer than your silly samples. You only have access to an optimized Save For Web version, which is seriously deteriorated by default and by choice.

 

You delete your comment about someone needing high-end monitors and high-end editing software

 

I have no idea what you are talking about. I deleted nothing.

 

Now go start your own thread. Or feel free to further make a fool of yourself.

 

As for George Duray caring about my silly, deteriorated JPEGS that aren't worth two pennies, I have a feeling he will love my cock work and offer me a job at BelAmi.

[+ Lucky]

Rh, don't think for a minute that I didn't enjoy the picture(s). They gave me a real boner!

[Boner]

If you decrease the Image Quality slider in the Save For Web dialogue box, to save on bandwidth for Daddy, you experience even more pixel destruction.

 

Your dishonesty has now become a money saver for Daddy. As a fore-thought. I'm actually speech-less.

 

 

As for George Duray caring about my silly, deteriorated JPEGS that aren't worth two pennies, I have a feeling he will love my cock work and offer me a job at BelAmi.

 

Suddenly, your calling your own Photoshop art-work skills, once produced and presented here as a delight for all of the gay men here to drool over and jack-off to - as deteriorated JPEGS that aren't worth two pennies - makes me believe that you are crapping in your, once forum suggested, underpants.

 

Then again, You should be. George Duroy (spelled correctly) not Duray, is not happy.

 

Perhaps you can Photoshop away your work here, if you're as fast as you have claimed to be - here today.

 

It would be a smart thing for you to do.

[maxwellissmart]

Seems his right pec is larger and his lips look a bit fuller to me but not sure on that

 

His dark meth-circle eyes are gone. If only we had this in real life...

[Lookin]

.

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad227/kaytee_13/Icons/Emoticons/smiley_running.gif Someone said RockHard was starting another thread for cocksuckers. Hope I'm not too late!

[Boner]

.

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad227/kaytee_13/Icons/Emoticons/smiley_running.gif Someone said RockHard was starting another thread for cocksuckers. Hope I'm not too late!

 

I'm personally baffled, by some members here, who will take no prisoners, when they find that an escort has lied, decieved, or even just fudged the truth a bit, to the escorts advantage.

 

Yet, when members here are subjected to the same protocal of truth-telling in their threads - that protocal suddenly falls on deaf ears and dumb-shit community denial.

 

The mirrors of your life don't begin or end with the escorts of whom you hire to fuck. They begin and end with the people that you choose to embrace and support in life because of whom they are as people.

 

Obviously, only you, can define those parameters for yourselves.

[+ WilliamM]

Response to Boner

 

I'm personally baffled, by some members here, who will take no prisoners, when they find that an escort has lied, decieved, or even just fudged the truth a bit, to the escorts advantage.

 

Yet, when members here are subjected to the same protocal of truth-telling in their threads - that protocal suddenly falls on deaf ears and dumb-shit community denial.

 

The mirrors of your life don't begin or end with the escorts of whom you hire to fuck. They begin and end with the people that you choose to embrace and support in life because of whom they are as people.

 

Obviously, only you, can define those parameters for yourselves.

 

I am not an escort. But, I have read all your comments on RH's photo, and agree with everything you have written.

[Diverdan]

I could enjoy either version of this guy!!!!

[+ Lucky]

It's protocol, not protocal, Mr. Duray.

 

(Boner apparently knows the man: Then again, You should be. George Duroy (spelled correctly) not Duray, is not happy.)

 

(Boner is upset that protocal is not being followed: I'm personally baffled, by some members here, who will take no prisoners, when they find that an escort has lied, decieved (sic), or even just fudged the truth a bit, to the escorts advantage.

 

Yet, when members here are subjected to the same protocal of truth-telling in their threads - that protocal suddenly falls on deaf ears and dumb-shit community denial.)

 

We used to have a poster here named Truth Teller. He annoyed a lot of people too. And he didn't like me!

People who think they have a monopoly on the truth are troubling.

[RockHard]

Moving on...

 

Gentlemen,

 

Please accept my apologies for spoiling the fun. I removed the Photoshop sample photos. In hindsight, it might have been less controversial to play this game and learn about Photoshop using images of dead people. But even then, I'm sure someone would find fault.

 

The truth is, I didn't think anyone would question the usefulness or the value of these photos. It never occurred to me that someone would see them as being worth anything because of the following:

 

1. The pixels in the JPEGs I used were optimized downward and set to the lowest quality. The pixels were hanging to a visual life by the thinnest thread. If you separated the two images and re-saved those files one more time, pixelation would begin to be visible. You couldn't successfully print the images or enlarge them. In my mind, they had little use, except for the fun of this game.

 

2. I also know the retouching sucked. I mean, it took me all of two minutes to slap these bitches together. Plus, I know professionally what it takes to do quality work, and I did not do that kind of work because you can't produce high quality retouching on a compressed JPEG. It's just not possible.

 

However, I tend to take my talent for granted because I've been using Photoshop professionally since it first became available in the early 90's. And much to my surprise, some people looked at these images and saw "high quality." And you know what they say, one man's garbage is another's gold.

 

Nobody asked me to remove the photos but, at the same time, I have no desire to feed thieves and sham artists. This is the internet, after all. I can't play the "I didn't know" card.

 

Thank you to everyone who wrote me to express an opinion. I realize most of you like to see cock, any cock, and I'll do my best not to disappoint in the future.

 

Since most of you know I leave NYC for the summer, and that time is coming soon, any new Photoshop game will have to wait until September. I have plenty of vintage photos. Maybe I can whip up something fun using them.

 

Enjoy the rest of your summer,

 

RH

[+ Lucky]

Well, the problem as I see it is this: We come here to have fun. We don't necessarily pay attention to our grammar, our spelling, our facts may be a bit off, but we think we are among friends and don't have to dress up for the occasion. Then along comes someone like Boner, who is in a rush to tell us that our shirt is untucked or our shoes don't match the outfit. Who set him up as the arbiter of fashion- or truth, for that matter?

[RockHard]

Then along comes someone like Boner

 

Just to be clear:

 

Boner had nothing to do with my photo removal, although it was his blown-up version that alerted someone else with a very smart brain. It was another board member who wrote me privately, and the result of that dialogue can be found in my post above.

[+ Lucky]

It isn't just that Boner was so quick to find fault with you. He has gone from one poster to another, telling them all how wrong they are, or how bad their post is. He is like some kind of evangelical pastor who tolerates no one out of their Sunday best at Church. But we are not at church, we are at a gay message board, trying to have some camaraderie and some fun.

[jjkrkwood]

Well, the problem as I see it is this: We come here to have fun. We don't necessarily pay attention to our grammar, our spelling, our facts may be a bit off, but we think we are among friends and don't have to dress up for the occasion. Then along comes someone like Boner, who is in a rush to tell us that our shirt is untucked or our shoes don't match the outfit. Who set him up as the arbiter of fashion- or truth, for that matter?

 

Lucky, there are many, many guys here that display the behavior you chastise Boner for, yet if they are in YOUR inner-circle, they are allowed that behavior, applauded for it and excused ! If you want rules to apply, they should apply equally for EVERYONE, including YOU.... If not, then stop whining about it.