As seen on Sproul Plaza

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Another Big Black Sabbath Fan

 

http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink1.jpg

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Hell NO - We Won't GO

 

http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink6.jpg

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Another Twink For Peace

 

http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink5.jpg

[Guest ncm2169]

RE: Another Twink For Peace

 

And for those of us who may be geographically challenged, Sproul Plaza would be where?:o

[+ Axiom2001]

RE: Another Twink For Peace

 

It appears that I will have to go to the University of California in Berkeley to devour these luscious cocks. The bods on these twinks aren't hitting it except for, I'd presume, the hunky backpacker, but the third legs on all three "boys" seem enticing!

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Two More Twinks For Peace

 

http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink2.jpg

 

http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink3.jpg

[Michael]

RE: Two More Twinks For Peace

 

Well, these guys all seem to be a lot better equipped than Berkeley's celebrated "Naked Guy", Andrew Martinez, whose pictues can be found here:

 

http://www.phdtop.com/martinez/index.htm

 

... kind of cute, but nothing to write home about in the dick department ...

[Guest]

RE: Another Twink For Peace

 

>http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink5.jpg

 

Before I would download this one on my hard drive, I would want to be able to prove this guy's at least 18...

[bluenix]

RE: Another Twink For Peace

 

>Before I would download this one on my hard drive, I would

>want to be able to prove this guy's at least 18...

 

If you looked at the pic you already have downloaded it on your hard drive. It will be residing in your temporary Internet files or, if you use Netscape, in your user cache.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

At Least 18

 

Twink Ho Number Three, who was kind enough to provide with access to this visuals, swears that all of the young men pictured here are old enough to go to war; they just do not want too....

[Guest Love Bubble Butt]

Am I only the guy on this board who's not into twinks? No offense to the guys pictured. But they just don't do anything for me. I like MEN, not skinny BOYS!

[+ glutes]

Well I like butts (hence 'glutes'), and also twinks. To each is own LBB, there are plenty of 'men' that seem to be reviewed here...

[Luv2play]

I'm with LBB, "where's the beef?". These twinks are verging on pre-pubescent! IMHO:o

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

'Splain Lucy

 

>I'm with LBB, "where's the beef?". These twinks are verging

>on pre-pubescent! IMHO:o

 

I have been using visual aids to explain to my own Twinks both the concept of being self-deprecating as well as the concept of in jokes.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

'Splain Lucy

 

>I'm with LBB, "where's the beef?". These twinks are verging

>on pre-pubescent! IMHO:o

 

I have been using visual aids to explain to my own Twinks both the concept of being self-deprecating as well as the concept of in jokes.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

http://members.aol.com/francoonduty/M4M/twink4.jpg

[VaHawk]

Well, I liked them! I'm very anti-war, so as IM MOORE (God rest his soul!) surmised I guess my handle means that other "thing". Seriously though, I like beef steak too, but sometimes, I'm more in the mood for some "chicken nuggets"!

[Boston Guy]

These pictures give me great concern

 

Oh, gosh, I like younger guys (in their 20s) and I am most definitely not a prude. But I am concerned about these pictures and I think others here should be, too, not least Hooboy.

 

It appears that at least some of these boys are underage and some seem quite a few years too young. Yet every person here who viewed those pics now has a copy of them on his hard drive.

 

Given what's happened with child pornography and the fact that simply having a picture of a child posed in a sexual manner on your computer can be enough to be convicted in some jurisdictions should be of great concern to everyone here.

 

Further, I think that HB should have a clear standard that prevents posting any pictures of underage boys (or girls).

 

I don't know what the standard is in other countries, but these pictures could easily be a problem here in the US. I advise everyone to delete them and avoid revisiting this thread.

 

BG

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Open Internet Options

 

>>Before I would download this one on my hard drive, I would

>>want to be able to prove this guy's at least 18...

>

>If you looked at the pic you already have downloaded it on

>your hard drive. It will be residing in your temporary

>Internet files or, if you use Netscape, in your user cache.

>

 

Or your Preferences, clear History; empty the cache and while you are at it, I would delete all cookies.

 

Unless any of you have downloaded the actual images to your computer by saving and right clicking, this will delete the temporary cache files.

 

Finally, these images are all suppose to represent males over the age of 18 when the photographs were taken, but I am removing the root files, since the point of this exercise was mainly humor.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Post 46557 Above

 

>Oh, gosh, I like younger guys (in their 20s) and I am most

>definitely not a prude. But I am concerned about these

>pictures and I think others here should be, too, not least

>Hooboy.

[VaHawk]

RE: Post 46557 Above

 

Hey man, did you forget to type your rebuttal???? Actually, I see no one in these shots that is not at least 18 and the only one who looks younger, imo, is the uncut blonde, but that speaks for itself! I'm sure all the great moderators working here would not have let these pictures be posted if there was any doubt on the age issue!

[Luv2play]

RE: Post 46557 Above

 

Yes, I see. And spacecrafts do not fall out of the sky, and nightclubs don't go up in a puff of smoke... Do you NOT believe your eyes, sometimes, or do you just assume everyone does his job properly?:+

[VaHawk]

RE: Post 46557 Above

 

Yes, I have 2 eyes and believe what I see, and imo, they all looked legal, but then again I didn't have access to any id, so what the hell do I know. But I see they are no longer viewable, so I can only assume that someone "perhaps you" issued an alert that was heeded. My apologies are extended if they were underaged, but I guess it's better to err on the side of caution than be questionable and legally liable, although it is way past the point in that regards as they have been out there the last 4 days. Given the wonders of computer technology combined with modern cosemetology, 14 yos can look 25 and 25 yos can look 14, but as I said discretion is the better part of valor and it so very wonderful to have the pc police out in full force!!!!!!!!!!!

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Just The Facts

 

If you go look at Post 46557 (above), I removed the pictures. Generally, in a membership based site such as this, there would be limits on the liability of the publisher for material uploaded by the readership of the site. However, since I do value this site, the owners and service providers, as well as the readers (clients and escorts alike), I choose to remove the photographs, which were on ANOTHER server, and only provided as a LINK to the server's here.

 

While the young men pictured were not and are not underage at the time the images were taken, as several people expressed a concern, the best response is to remove them.

 

If you have a concern about having "downloaded" the thread to your computer, Post 46557 above also offers suggestions on removing the "temporary" cache files in questions from the two most popular browser programs available. AOL users can also go to their Preferences menu and look under "WWW" to empty their cache, which is something EVERYONE should do with some regularity in any event, unless you know how to use cache files properly and use a dial service where this does provide you with an actual benefit.