Sean Caden

[jjkrkwood]

According to his text his is "seeing someone," and therefore unavailable. His dimness has made him more attractive to me for some reason. I would love to quiz him on World history over some drinks.

 

YEs, yes of course, and we all know that was to blow you off. So make another contact, making NO mention of your previous one and attempt to book him in HIS town. I bet you score ?

[citylaw1]

YEs, yes of course, and we all know that was to blow you off. So make another contact, making NO mention of your previous one and attempt to book him in HIS town. I bet you score ?

 

I think that a weekend with Sean and I would make you positively violent. I would love it. For good measure, we could hire Mike Diamond to announce our arrival.

[citylaw1]

Oh come on city, I see that Twinkle in your eye when you talk about him. You are smitten with the dumb as dirt kid. He actually thought that Africa was a ghetto in the USA and felt a young white boy wouldnt be safe there.

 

I am actually more attracted to him now than I was before. 2 days would be torture though. An hour or 2 would be divine.

[jjkrkwood]

I think that a weekend with Sean and I would make you positively violent. I would love it. For good measure, we could hire Mike Diamond to announce our arrival.

 

Violent ? I am loving this thread, and I think the quickest way to get over him is to have him "under" you ? Otherwise you'll take this crush to your grave.... All I am trying to do is help you get THIS thread into the Guiness Book for "longest, meaningless Thread".....

[jjkrkwood]

I am actually more attracted to him now than I was before. 2 days would be torture though. An hour or 2 would be divine.

 

So basically, you are walking around with pre-cum stains on your Brooks Brothers khakis ????

[citylaw1]

So basically, you are walking around with pre-cum stains on your Brooks Brothers khakis ????

 

Honey, none of that shit fits anymore. Tommy Bahama linen with the shirt out and flowing. I haven't tucked a shirt in for 2 years!

[jjkrkwood]

Honey, none of that shit fits anymore. Tommy Bahama linen with the shirt out and flowing. I haven't tucked a shirt in for 2 years!

 

Not even in Court ???? Ah, so you are going for the look of the Husband in "LaCage Au Folles" ???

[citylaw1]

Not even in Court ???? Ah, so you are going for the look of the Husband in "LaCage Au Folles" ???

 

I haven't seen a courtroom in years. I am a contract lawyer for a large corporation. I work remotely mostly.

[instudiocity]

You still think it was my faulty prose that wrecked this meet up?

No, I never thought that your faulty prose was anything other than your faulty prose... 7,233,827 posts ago you were complaining about not getting to hook up with Boy Sean. If he'd been the one bitching, I'd have told him he was a piss-poor sales person just like I was telling you, you were piss-poor at communicating with him. I didn't have his audience, so I didn't tell him anything. The fact that Sean fucked up his communications doesn't excuse the fact that you fucked up your communications, too.

 

I'm still embarrassed for you because you expressed that you don't have to be nice to a guy you're paying $400 to fuck. That's just wrong on so many levels.

[jjkrkwood]

No, I never thought that your faulty prose was anything other than your faulty prose... 7,233,827 posts ago you were complaining about not getting to hook up with Boy Sean. If he'd been the one bitching, I'd have told him he was a piss-poor sales person just like I was telling you, you were piss-poor at communicating with him. I didn't have his audience, so I didn't tell him anything. The fact that Sean fucked up his communications doesn't excuse the fact that you fucked up your communications, too.

 

I'm still embarrassed for you because you expressed that you don't have to be nice to a guy you're paying $400 to fuck. That's just wrong on so many levels.

 

Mon dieu !

[gallahadesquire]

According to his text his is "seeing someone," and therefore unavailable. His dimness has made him more attractive to me for some reason. I would love to quiz him on World history over some drinks.

 

Oh, that way lies madness. Been there, done that. Be CAREFUL, Wotan, be CAREFUL!

[citylaw1]

No, I never thought that your faulty prose was anything other than your faulty prose... 7,233,827 posts ago you were complaining about not getting to hook up with Boy Sean. If he'd been the one bitching, I'd have told him he was a piss-poor sales person just like I was telling you, you were piss-poor at communicating with him. I didn't have his audience, so I didn't tell him anything. The fact that Sean fucked up his communications doesn't excuse the fact that you fucked up your communications, too.

 

I'm still embarrassed for you because you expressed that you don't have to be nice to a guy you're paying $400 to fuck. That's just wrong on so many levels.

 

I will try educating you once again:

 

1. I never complained about not getting to hook up with Sean. I complained about his handling of booking requests when they are made how HE instructs.

 

2. My communications were to the point and descriptive. Again, we were trying to fuck and hang out for money, not arrange a wedding between our daughters.

 

3. This a forum for "discussing escorts" (probably the 10th time I've reminded you of that) and their ability to perform, arrange bookings, etc.

 

4. I never said (check your sources) that you shouldn't be nice to someone that you are paying to fuck...never. I am always nice to any escort that I hire. I did, however, tell you that I don't find it necessary to swoon and romance via text to arrange a booking. If that's your thing, well then splendid.

 

5. I find it hilarious that you blame me for "fucking up my communications" ... Are you interested, followed by what is your rate ... laughable.

 

6. Idiot.

[citylaw1]

Writers don't make that mistake. You were overly generous with the uneducated.

 

True enough.

[orbital sander]

shhh..don't wake them back up.

[citylaw1]

The guy just doesn't want to meet you for that or whatever reason. Why not just leave it at that?

 

Well, had I decided to "leave it at that" we never would have learned as much as we have about Sean, right? This thread is about Sean, not about how others see me! Thanks to this thread, we have learned the following of Sean:

 

1. Doesn't travel.

2. Is not a fan of outcalls with new clients.

3. Is very cute.

4. Has performed well with members here.

5. May not be the best conversationalist and/or socially appropriate for some (clearly demonstrated through his video interview) This would not deter me however.

6. Hot bottom in bed.

 

So basically I learned that I would hire Sean if I were in San Diego for an evening of fun. If I DEPENDED on the appointment for a social gathering or trip, I would not hire Sean. Others have learned from here as well, and are better able to decide, for themselves, whether or not to hire Sean based on information revealed herein. Isn't that what this forum is about?

[jjkrkwood]

Well, had I decided to "leave it at that" we never would have learned as much as we have about Sean, right? This thread is about Sean, not about how others see me! Thanks to this thread, we have learned the following of Sean:

 

1. Doesn't travel.

2. Is not a fan of outcalls with new clients.

3. Is very cute.

4. Has performed well with members here.

5. May not be the best conversationalist and/or socially appropriate for some (clearly demonstrated through his video interview) This would not deter me however.

6. Hot bottom in bed.

 

So basically I learned that I would hire Sean if I were in San Diego for an evening of fun. If I DEPENDED on the appointment for a social gathering or trip, I would not hire Sean. Others have learned from here as well, and are better able to decide, for themselves, whether or not to hire Sean based on information revealed herein. Isn't that what this forum is about?

 

Interesting spin. I would say what we learned about Sean is basically all "hearsay", but what we learned about YOU on the other hand, well...........:o

[bigvalboy]

Well, had I decided to "leave it at that" we never would have learned as much as we have about Sean, right? This thread is about Sean, not about how others see me! Thanks to this thread, we have learned the following of Sean:

 

1. Doesn't travel.

2. Is not a fan of outcalls with new clients.

3. Is very cute.

4. Has performed well with members here.

5. May not be the best conversationalist and/or socially appropriate for some (clearly demonstrated through his video interview) This would not deter me however.

6. Hot bottom in bed.

 

So basically I learned that I would hire Sean if I were in San Diego for an evening of fun. If I DEPENDED on the appointment for a social gathering or trip, I would not hire Sean. Others have learned from here as well, and are better able to decide, for themselves, whether or not to hire Sean based on information revealed herein. Isn't that what this forum is about?

 

Gotta say something here City, simply because. While I still wait for 'Chinese' to be delivered...LOL I have read with great interest the last day or so this entire thread, and I gotta tell you, I think you held your own against the attackers quite well. I am actually very impressed. You answered everyone very calmly but directly and defended your original position with integrity...My hat goes off to you sir. I for one, always saw your original position, I wasn't about to jump into the controversy however, that was more drama than I was looking for, but kudos to you anyway...

[maxwellissmart]

Well, had I decided to "leave it at that" we never would have learned as much as we have about Sean, right? This thread is about Sean, not about how others see me! Thanks to this thread, we have learned the following of Sean:

 

1. Doesn't travel.

2. Is not a fan of outcalls with new clients.

3. Is very cute.

4. Has performed well with members here.

5. May not be the best conversationalist and/or socially appropriate for some (clearly demonstrated through his video interview) This would not deter me however.

6. Hot bottom in bed.

 

So basically I learned that I would hire Sean if I were in San Diego for an evening of fun. If I DEPENDED on the appointment for a social gathering or trip, I would not hire Sean. Others have learned from here as well, and are better able to decide, for themselves, whether or not to hire Sean based on information revealed herein. Isn't that what this forum is about?

 

Don't forget that we also learned Sean doesn't judge people without meeting them first.

 

But not really.

[jjkrkwood]

Now city, dont let your head swell over one members previous post. We all know you were zonked out on Valium over this whole experience, and on the verge of being comatose. But tranquility DOES count for something... And the whole point of this post was that you didnt want "to hold your own". you wanted Sean to hold it for you !

[instudiocity]

We went from "how much?" to "I'm seeing someone" in 2 minutes worth of texts. I submitted a review with the full text. We had no other communication and his ad is still up. Trust me, this guy is a flake. In 6 years I've never written a negative review until yesterday.

 

You may be correct Brooklyn. Following the few texts over 2 days I can tell you that he's not a professional escort.

 

Pssst! He's still awake. From the first twenty or so posts to the thread... citylaw1 is such a great judge of flake-ism and professionalism that after 4 text messages in a 26 hour time frame he can not only pronounce someone a flake but also not a professional escort.

 

Even though he can summarize the thread saying:

1. Doesn't travel.

2. Is not a fan of outcalls with new clients.

3. Is very cute.

4. Has performed well with members here.

5. May not be the best conversationalist and/or socially appropriate for some (clearly demonstrated through his video interview) This would not deter me however.

6. Hot bottom in bed.

So which is he? Flake/Not a professional escort or 1-6? Not so sure what citylaw1 defines as a flake.

[jjkrkwood]

Pssst! He's still awake. From the first twenty or so posts to the thread... citylaw1 is such a great judge of flake-ism and professionalism that after 4 text messages in a 26 hour time frame he can not only pronounce someone a flake but also not a professional escort.

 

Even though he can summarize the thread saying:

So which is he? Flake/Not a professional escort or 1-6? Not so sure what citylaw1 defines as a flake.

 

Whatever it IS, he sure do Likey !

[citylaw1]

Interesting spin. I would say what we learned about Sean is basically all "hearsay", but what we learned about YOU on the other hand, well...........:o

 

Overruled ... Sean presented direct testimony by way of video (much was learned from that video), and members (including myself, yes text is not hearsay) posted of direct experience. Sorry JJ, I know you tried.

[citylaw1]

Pssst! He's still awake. From the first twenty or so posts to the thread... citylaw1 is such a great judge of flake-ism and professionalism that after 4 text messages in a 26 hour time frame he can not only pronounce someone a flake but also not a professional escort.

 

Even though he can summarize the thread saying:

So which is he? Flake/Not a professional escort or 1-6? Not so sure what citylaw1 defines as a flake.

 

I think a little bit of everything. Unlike you, I read, digest and then form an opinion. I, like other thinking men, am able to change my opinion as the circumstances and evidence develop. Upon hearing from other clients that met him, I changed my original opinion a bit.

 

1. Flake where travel and essential appointments are concerned. Clearly Sean should simply tell clients that he doesn't travel, rather than toy with words.

2. Perhaps he should look at the wisdom of texting as his preferred avenue of communication. Although, following the video, I'm not sure how belabored or detail heavy conversation would go.

3. If you are able to meet up with him locally, the chances are (from absorbing posters' comments here ... a suggestion that I offer to you) pretty good that you'll have a nice time.

4. After learning here that Sean prefers not to commit to outcalls with a first time client, I might look for an incall, however, this is not MY first preference.

5. Sean is probably not the most professional escort out there, and some might be unhappy with this. I probably wouldn't care unless travel was involved.

6. Some might be troubled by his effeminate manner and limited verbiage. I think we all learned that. For me, I would still book, travel with, and devour him. It wouldn't bother me at all. For others like JJ for example, he would hate him.

 

So, he sure is a bit flakey, and most definitely not professional. Unlike you sir, I learned a lot more about Sean from this thread, via direct testimony from clients (sorry JJ, it's not hearsay when you are receiving evidence from the party directly involved) and a lovely video that was posted, which revealed his delicious body. I actually come away with more attraction to Sean than I had when I responded to his Rentboy Ad. And, i'm quite sure, that others came away knowing that Sean is not for them.

[citylaw1]

Don't forget that we also learned Sean doesn't judge people without meeting them first.

 

But not really.

 

Yes. Another misstep by our little twink. Honestly, I suspect he isn't comfortable with new clients ... traveling with them especially. He should change his ad.

[citylaw1]

Gotta say something here City, simply because. While I still wait for 'Chinese' to be delivered...LOL I have read with great interest the last day or so this entire thread, and I gotta tell you, I think you held your own against the attackers quite well. I am actually very impressed. You answered everyone very calmly but directly and defended your original position with integrity...My hat goes off to you sir. I for one, always saw your original position, I wasn't about to jump into the controversy however, that was more drama than I was looking for, but kudos to you anyway...

 

Thank you. It wasn't that hard ... believe me.