Madonna Eating Out Tony Ward

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Another planet heard from

 

Actually, I will very politely decline to rim a client if there is any suspicion of anything down there that should not be down there as a prelude to sex. With the bisexual clients and married clients, of which about a third to half of my client base consists of at any given time, when they request it, I always make sure we have discussed what they are experienced with and that they know how to properly prepare, particularly if they make specific requests of things they want to do. With novice gay men, I do this as well. I also even make sure an experienced bottom understands my requirements if this is the case or they simply do without this activity, but even then, any messiness down there is a total "buzz kill" to my erection. As I have pointed out here elsewhere, for an uncut man, a lack of cleanliness is a potential urinary tract infection waiting to happen and this is true even with condom use. As you may unfortunately know from experience, if there is any mess on the condom, it will easily travel to the areas at the base or to your hands where there is no protection afforded by latex.

 

If it is really an issue, a shower is always a good suggestion, but I am loathe to do prompt an activity which is going to make the client feel I am padding the session unnecessarily with non-sexual activity. I prefer the client arrives at my door step or greets me at his fully able to experience what he wants.

 

Given the fact that it is common and frequent for sexually experienced homosexual men to test positive for the antibodies to hepatitis, this is something which everyone should take as a serious concern and being clean should be a paramount interest, whether you are on the bottom or top of the equation.

[+ Lucky]

Okay, I apologize to deej for saying he has his head up someone's ass. But I was annoyed, I think justifiably. I have contributed to this board since March 2000, and I don't like his calling me surly just because I expressed an opinion.

To make things clear: I think this sight is primarily for men who are into men, but it is open to anyone. That said, I don't think I should be put down on this board by a woman for not wanting to see a pic of a woman eating out a hot man.

I do wonder why this woman finds it necessary to be here, but I do not challenge her right, just her manners.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>Well, it's about time, Thunderbuns. I knew you couldn't

>play nice for very long. You've just got to bash

>somebody...

 

If you think this is bashing, honey - you've lived a VERY protected life!

 

>And I wasn't chastizing anyone. None of my gay male friends

>are as sensitive as some of you guys. Get over it!

 

I guess calling mature male adults "little kids" is your idea of a compliment?

 

>but at least I don't insult anyone here!

 

In your opinion.

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>I'm with deej. Lucky & Thunder, you are SO way out of line

>here. She was not "chastising" anyone, and since when has

>she ever expressed "convoluted" opinions?

 

As per my previous post, if you think calling mature gay males "little kids" is not a convoluted opinion, then stick by your guns.

 

Funny that Lucky can attract a negative comment from Wonderwoman and that's just fine. But let someone say something negative about her and it "flys on shit" time.

 

>And nothing about

>either Kathryn or Tina's posts has ever indicated that they

>are "fag hags."

 

Then why are they hanging out on a escort and cocksuckers message board?

 

>You guys obviously have issues with women

>that have nothing to do with what these 2 women have posted.

 

I have no "issues" (hate that overused term) with women. I just happen to feel that they have as much to contribute to a message board such as this as they have to contribute at the Gaiety. And if you put any stock in what guys have said about the Gaiety invasion lately, the answer is - not much.

 

>How do we know, anyway, that they are the

>only 2 females here? This is all anonymous. Maybe they're

>just the only 2 honest females. Perhaps you two and

>Will are really women.

 

Right on! Wanna smell my twat?

 

And how do we know that K & WW aren't Ethan and Regulation in disguise?

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest Thunderbuns]

> LOL he probably did'nt get any salt with his meals on

>wheels delivery today.

 

Come on Tay - you can do much better than that - weak weak weak

 

Thunderbuns

[Rick Munroe]

>if you think calling mature gay males "little kids"

 

Hey, who said any of us were mature? Don't include me there.

 

>Then why are they hanging out on a escort and cocksuckers message board?

 

Isn't it possible that they hire some of the escorts reviewed here? And that they like to suck cock? I don't see the point in trying to exclude them. They aren't trying to "steal" anything away from us.

 

>And how do we know that K & WW aren't Ethan and Regulation in disguise?

 

Because they're women, not cunts. :*

[Guest wndrwoman]

>To make things clear: I think this sight is primarily for

>men who are into men, but it is open to anyone. That said, I

>don't think I should be put down on this board by a woman

>for not wanting to see a pic of a woman eating out a hot

>man.

>I do wonder why this woman finds it necessary to be here,

>but I do not challenge her right, just her manners.

 

Jesus, are you guys STILL raggin' on this?

OK, Lucky, I'm sorry if I offended you. I'm sorry you took my words as "putting you down". Attribute it to lack of sleep, too much tina, or too much work, but I apologize if I hurt yours or anyone else's feelings.

 

Perhaps you missed it when I first joined the board, but I'm doing research on male escorts. (And yeah, I'll tell you MY real job if you tell me yours!) I've met A LOT of really neat people on this board, both clients and escorts, through email and in person. And if you're wondering why I don't find a site where women review male escorts, it's simply because IT DOESN'T EXIST! If you don't believe me, surf to your heart's content.

 

And finally, regarding rimming, ass play, or anything else that one might consider dirty, why in the hell would any of you think that heteros would be any dirtier than non-heteros? Hygiene is paramount to me and to the men I see. So, SeaGuy, I feel sorry for you if your partners choose not to shower. I find that disgusting but to each his own....Oh, and the mini-insult about how "ladies" shouldn't rim...give it a rest.

t

[taylorky]

>So I think rimming is basically and strictly the

>territory of hos and homos who don't mind getting their

>mouths dirty and going where no man has gone before.

RIMMING= sticking your TOUNGE up somebodys ASS >>>>>>>>>ewwwwwwwww that is gross,and even worse.....doing it to people you don't even know.sorry guys but blaggggghhhhhh. :o

[BewareofNick]

What porn has he appeared in?

 

I was curious since he has been described as an ex-pornstar. What name did he use?

[+ Lucky]

I accept your apology!;-)

[+ Lucky]

Hey taylor, I missed your birthday, Aug. 9. Hope it was happy.

Now, I see in your profile that you like anything outdoors. I guess rimming is too inside for you!

Think about it, though, a hot guy's most private place right in your face!:9

[+ deej]

RE: What porn has he appeared in?

 

>I was curious since he has been described as an ex-pornstar.

 

I don't know that he ever actually did any hardcore porn.

 

But for several years (before all the tats and hard living) he was Anthony Borden Ward. He was featured in frequent photo spreads in many magazines, and for about a year, "In Touch" had to have at least one photo of him or the issue wasn't complete. (It was editorial policy.)

 

He's in the same category as David Burrill. Billed as a "porn star" but never did actual porn. Still, because he was all over his name is well-known.

[SFViking]

RE: What porn has he appeared in?

 

>He's in the same category as David Burrill. Billed as a

>"porn star" but never did actual porn. Still, because he was

>all over his name is well-known.

 

I could have sworn I had videos of David Burrill doing hard core porn, but maybe that was my (wishful thinking) imagination.

 

The only film I've ever seen Tony Ward in was "Hustler White"; not porn by any stretch.