How to review when......

[Guest bystander]

Hello all. Newbie here but been a lurker for many years

 

I'd like to hear your answer to this. Say you met with an escort and everything went ok, not great, but ok. Then, you accidentally left something very important to you in his place You tried to work it out with him. But after 2 weeks of email, text, and non-answered phonecalls and being led to believe it would be resolved, nothing. How would you review that escort?

[Guest greatness]

well

 

I'm sorry that you have to go through this. Well if he has something that belongs to you then he should return it to you. It doesn't matter he is an escort or not, I think. Why is he not returning it to you?

 

Hello all. Newbie here but been a lurker for many years

 

I'd like to hear your answer to this. Say you met with an escort and everything went ok, not great, but ok. Then, you accidentally left something very important to you in his place You tried to work it out with him. But after 2 weeks of email, text, and non-answered phonecalls and being led to believe it would be resolved, nothing. How would you review that escort?

[+ glutes]

In the review say, "I left my Rolex there, but he never returned my emails, texts, or answered my phone calls"

[Guest greatness]

oh my

 

He should return it to you and let others know what he did. I guess you got it as a present from someone special. I don't take anything valuable with me except of course "my body" to meet an escort. I sometimes wear nice shoes but that's about it. Anyways, I hope you can get your Rolex back.

 

In the review say, "I left my Rolex there, but he never returned my emails, texts, or answered my phone calls"

[Guest bystander]

dunno

 

Beats me. I don't know either. My friend said it had no financial value. But it is important to him. I think it was a gift from someone special (not BF) in his life. I think he expressed that to him a few times.

 

 

I'm sorry that you have to go through this. Well if he has something that belongs to you then he should return it to you. It doesn't matter he is an escort or not, I think. Why is he not returning it to you?

[Guest bystander]

HAHAHA. It's not as expensive as a rolex, but shouldn't it be substantiated a bit more than a simple sentence?

 

 

In the review say, "I left my Rolex there, but he never returned my emails, texts, or answered my phone calls"

[Guest greatness]

lol

 

glutes you are so witty... I bought what you wrote. I'm so gullible..

 

HAHAHA. It's not as expensive as a rolex, but shouldn't it be substantiated a bit more than a simple sentence?

[+ deej]

Your review should honestly and completely describe ALL of the paid time you spent together, including the time you've paid for while retrieving lost property.

 

If you expect him to give up income while meeting you for time not on the clock make sure you spell that out in the review. Readers do deserve to know when unreasonable demands have been made.

[NYTomcat]

Now I hope this is not one of the escorts who regularly posts here. In fact I hope its not one that is regularly reviewed here. But if so make an attempt one.last time to get the item back. Scheduled at his convenience. You Did leave it After all. But in either event I do not think you should use the review or threat of a bad review as a weapon. If ie will not assist. Then you should review that as well as the encounter itself in detail. If he does assist give him kudos for that. But reviews should not be carrots for the escort or sticks. They are not to help or hurt an escort for a good or bad time. Though they often may have that effect. They should be to educate other consumers about what to expect or plan for. Remember a reviewers audience are future hirers. And to a lesser extent other escorts who may want to refer a client or work with (ooohhh im getting visual images here-sorry where was I ) right. Reviews are for the future customer. So good luck and I hope he does right by you. But Either way.... review it.

[+ glutes]

glutes you are so witty... I bought what you wrote. I'm so gullible..

 

I had a (real) massage therapist leave his watch in my apartment. When he called me 3 hours after he departed, I waited for him out front...

[Guest bystander]

Don't worry NYTomcat, I think the ones regularly reviewed here are the real pros.

 

I thought so too. Keep the review true to the time with the escort. But note the other event in an informative way. Let the future hirers make their own decision.

 

Now I hope this is not one of the escorts who regularly posts here. In fact I hope its not one that is regularly reviewed here. But if so make an attempt one.last time to get the item back. Scheduled at his convenience. You Did leave it After all. But in either event I do not think you should use the review or threat of a bad review as a weapon. If ie will not assist. Then you should review that as well as the encounter itself in detail. If he does assist give him kudos for that. But reviews should not be carrots for the escort or sticks. They are not to help or hurt an escort for a good or bad time. Though they often may have that effect. They should be to educate other consumers about what to expect or plan for. Remember a reviewers audience are future hirers. And to a lesser extent other escorts who may want to refer a client or work with (ooohhh im getting visual images here-sorry where was I ) right. Reviews are for the future customer. So good luck and I hope he does right by you. But Either way.... review it.

[NYTomcat]

See now wouldn't you love to here that about an escort in a review. It reminds me of that great thread about nice things your escorts have done for you. Outside the bedroom. Jeez minds out of the gutters people. But only for a moment

:o

I had a (real) massage therapist leave his watch in my apartment. When he called me 3 hours after he departed, I waited for him out front...

[Guest greatness]

Aww

 

You are so sweet.. I hope it wasn't so cold or hot outside..

 

I had a (real) massage therapist leave his watch in my apartment. When he called me 3 hours after he departed, I waited for him out front...

[JT Brooklyn]

I've been in this situation Twice..Both times the "Working Guy" just said come back over and pick it up!

 

These were both guys that I had no "Regular" visits with so it could have taken a nasty turn..But didn't!

 

So I would definitely do a Review and mention that this "Dick Head" seems to have a problem!

[NYTomcat]

Don't worry NYTomcat, I think the ones regularly reviewed here are the real pros.

 

I thought so too. Keep the review true to the time with the escort. But note the other event in an informative way. Let the future hirers make their own decision.

 

I think your being very fair that way. And truly best of luck getting those sentimental items back. I hope he proves to be a pro.

[+ sf westcoaster]

I would write a review of the session and work into the review that you left something at his place and that your attempts to retrieve it fell on deaf ears. The escorts failure to reply says tons about him as an individual.

[+ purplekow]

Well, if you have any largely built friends, anyone who is cop, wrestler, professional hitman, extra on the Sopranos, I would ask him to join me while I paid a visit to the escort. I would call from outside the escort's location and indicate that you would like to come by for the item in question. If still met with a stone wall, I would knock at the door with my accompanying friend and politely ask if there is a problem in returning the keychain made out of plastic braids that your favorite nephew made at band camp for his mother. I would encourage my companion to throw in a disgusted snort and a aptly timed muscle flex. I think you might have that keychain back before you know it.

[Guest greatness]

oh

 

Purplekow, you remind me of Jason Bourne.. hot!

[+ ArVaGuy]

Welcome to the message board Bystander.

 

I'm sorry to learn of this situation with the escort. I concur with much of the advice stated. The review should cover the details of the paid encounter but also mention at the end this situation. If it's taken two weeks of calls and e-mails with still no resolution that's a window into the guy's character in my view. Even if the item has no major monetary value, it is wrong to delay giving it back.

 

 

Hello all. Newbie here but been a lurker for many years

 

I'd like to hear your answer to this. Say you met with an escort and everything went ok, not great, but ok. Then, you accidentally left something very important to you in his place You tried to work it out with him. But after 2 weeks of email, text, and non-answered phonecalls and being led to believe it would be resolved, nothing. How would you review that escort?

[wayout]

Well, if you have any largely built friends, anyone who is cop, wrestler, professional hitman, extra on the Sopranos, I would ask him to join me while I paid a visit to the escort. I would call from outside the escort's location and indicate that you would like to come by for the item in question. If still met with a stone wall, I would knock at the door with my accompanying friend and politely ask if there is a problem in returning the keychain made out of plastic braids that your favorite nephew made at band camp for his mother. I would encourage my companion to throw in a disgusted snort and a aptly timed muscle flex. I think you might have that keychain back before you know it.

 

Welcome to the board Bystander.

 

You mentioned that two weeks of emails, texts and phone calls took place. Has there actually been any reply to those from the escort or is he completely ignoring it all or some. If he has answered, what has he indicated as far as action he would take? A little more detail would be useful but in general I agree with most of the previous posts and should be included in the review assuming it has been concluded that it isn't going to be returned. Although not the intent of the review process, it might actually cause the escort to take some action to resolve the matter so that he can reply that it was resolved.

 

I am not sure if purplekow's post above was tongue in cheek, but in case it might be taken seriously it is certainly not something that I would recommend as it may have an outcome that is not what is intended.

[Guest RyanCade]

Honest review or no review.

 

Hello all. Newbie here but been a lurker for many years

 

I'd like to hear your answer to this. Say you met with an escort and everything went ok, not great, but ok. Then, you accidentally left something very important to you in his place You tried to work it out with him. But after 2 weeks of email, text, and non-answered phonecalls and being led to believe it would be resolved, nothing. How would you review that escort?

 

An honest review or no review. The purpose of the review is for the benifit of it's future readers helping them make successful worth while connections with reputable escorts. By omitting such information, that in my opinion, speaks volumes of the escorts character and level of integrity, helps no one.

 

I don't have both sides, and from experience it is a must before jumping to conclusions. However, if it is as you say it is, I would prepare the review and email a copy to the escort prior to posting it. I would also include a short note advising him of my intent and my sincere desire to resolve the issue, bypassing the need to publicly address it. It is my guess that he will promptly respond with an overly apologetic attitude and express his "sincere" desire to return your property.

 

I would consider that before a thread like this. I may be wrong, but I am "guessing" that you have received private messages requesting the identity of the escort and my "guess" is that you have probably identified him to 1 or even two forum members. Who will in turn share with only a few who will do the same and so on. This has virtually the same affect on his reputation, but renders him defenseless without the benefit of rebuttal.

 

The last thought I had was, and I am not very clear on, but it seemed as if someone other than the client had posted for the client.. I am interested in knowing for sure, but if it is indeed the case, I feel it should be given little credibility. The answer to the original question seems a no brainer and It causes me to be inquisitive as to the motive behind the post.

 

Just my opinion, right wrong or indifferent. I may be way off base, without the other side it could be an inaccurate assessment.

 

Respectfully:)

[Guest bystander]

LOL, I'm sure purplekow was just being funny.

 

As far as I was told (remember, it is a friend), the guy did reply a few times, but always left my friend hanging. The guy's replies were to the effect of "do you have plans tonight; I may be able to drop it off; I'm free tomorrow; how about after?" But it always stopped there. My friend made himself flexible and available and informed the guy by email and/or text, but no reply. Nada, niet, niente. He may have come to a point of being annoying, but that's because there were no replies at all. So my friend wasn't sure how to rearrange his schedule or if it was even going to happen:( Please note that my friend never once went to his area or house or anything close to it. He is the most patient and respectful person I know.

 

 

Welcome to the board Bystander.

 

You mentioned that two weeks of emails, texts and phone calls took place. Has there actually been any reply to those from the escort or is he completely ignoring it all or some. If he has answered, what has he indicated as far as action he would take? A little more detail would be useful but in general I agree with most of the previous posts and should be included in the review assuming it has been concluded that it isn't going to be returned. Although not the intent of the review process, it might actually cause the escort to take some action to resolve the matter so that he can reply that it was resolved.

 

I am not sure if purplekow's post above was tongue in cheek, but in case it might be taken seriously it is certainly not something that I would recommend as it may have an outcome that is not what is intended.

[Guest bystander]

I agree with what you said including your suggestion.

 

Nope, the client is a very private person and not a member here. He doesn't even want to post a review at all. So I thought of posting the scenario and see how it would be handled properly. Surely, someone must have experienced the same thing before.

 

 

An honest review or no review. The purpose of the review is for the benifit of it's future readers helping them make successful worth while connections with reputable escorts. By omitting such information, that in my opinion, speaks volumes of the escorts character and level of integrity, helps no one.

 

I don't have both sides, and from experience it is a must before jumping to conclusions. However, if it is as you say it is, I would prepare the review and email a copy to the escort prior to posting it. I would also include a short note advising him of my intent and my sincere desire to resolve the issue, bypassing the need to publicly address it. It is my guess that he will promptly respond with an overly apologetic attitude and express his "sincere" desire to return your property.

 

I would consider that before a thread like this. I may be wrong, but I am "guessing" that you have received private messages requesting the identity of the escort and my "guess" is that you have probably identified him to 1 or even two forum members. Who will in turn share with only a few who will do the same and so on. This has virtually the same affect on his reputation, but renders him defenseless without the benefit of rebuttal.

 

The last thought I had was, and I am not very clear on, but it seemed as if someone other than the client had posted for the client.. I am interested in knowing for sure, but if it is indeed the case, I feel it should be given little credibility. The answer to the original question seems a no brainer and It causes me to be inquisitive as to the motive behind the post.

 

Just my opinion, right wrong or indifferent. I may be way off base, without the other side it could be an inaccurate assessment.

 

Respectfully:)

[Guest RyanCade]

The defense has no further questions your honer.

 

LOL, I'm sure purplekow was just being funny.

 

As far as I was told (remember, it is a friend), the guy did reply a few times, but always left my friend hanging. The guy's replies were to the effect of "do you have plans tonight; I may be able to drop it off; I'm free tomorrow; how about after?" But it always stopped there. My friend made himself flexible and available and informed the guy by email and/or text, but no reply. Nada, niet, niente. He may have come to a point of being annoying, but that's because there were no replies at all. So my friend wasn't sure how to rearrange his schedule or if it was even going to happen:( Please note that my friend never once went to his area or house or anything close to it. He is the most patient and respectful person I know.

 

I have highlighted the areas that I feel make this inappropriate and a deal breaker. It should be considered hear say. using the word "MAY" have become annoying and then following with the reason indicates that he did become annoying. Why the preemptive defense. "never once went to his area his house or anything close to it" ??? "He "may" have come to a point of being annoying", but "he is the most patient and respectful person I know" and how do you lead one to believe it will be resolved with "no replies at all"

 

Not to be frank, but this story is suspicious and has a few holes in it..

 

and no I am not the new escort advocate, but like Judge Judy says. "Don't tell me what he said" and "If it doesn't make sense it's not true"

[Guest RyanCade]

The defense has no further questions your honer.

 

LOL, I'm sure purplekow was just being funny.

 

As far as I was told (remember, it is a friend), the guy did reply a few times, but always left my friend hanging. The guy's replies were to the effect of "do you have plans tonight; I may be able to drop it off; I'm free tomorrow; how about after?" But it always stopped there. My friend made himself flexible and available and informed the guy by email and/or text, but no reply. Nada, niet, niente. He may have come to a point of being annoying, but that's because there were no replies at all. So my friend wasn't sure how to rearrange his schedule or if it was even going to happen:( Please note that my friend never once went to his area or house or anything close to it. He is the most patient and respectful person I know.

 

I have highlighted the areas that I feel make this inappropriate and a deal breaker. It should be considered hear say. using the word "MAY" have become annoying and then following with the reason indicates that he did become annoying. Why the preemptive defense. "never once went to his area his house or anything close to it" ??? "He "may" have come to a point of being annoying", but "he is the most patient and respectful person I know"

 

Not to be frank, but this story is suspicious and has a few holes in it..

 

and no I am not the new escort advocate, but like Judge Judy says. "Don't tell me what he said" and "If it doesn't make sense it's not true"