Coverboy Luka

[+ purplekow]

Just want to jump ahead and name today's coverboy Luka as being on my must see list for 2010. After the who did great in 2009 list, the who are you looking forward to list follows.

[uwsman2]

why, oh why?

 

Why, oh why is it that when a fantastic picture of a new escort shows up with a review, the review is always by somebody who has never posted a review before, and the description is just vague enough to leave one to draw inferences without saying what the escort will actually do? Luka sounds too good to be true.... So I hope a subsequent review shows up from a repeat reviewer.

[+ glutes]

Even a comment from a reputable poster here in the MF would help!

[JT Brooklyn]

Just want to jump ahead and name today's coverboy Luka as being on my must see list for 2010. After the who did great in 2009 list, the who are you looking forward to list follows.

 

Damn Purdee Pix's! His Rentboy AD has been up for awhile now.

 

I'm sure there will be more discussion about this Hunky guy with the Gorgeous Butt... to come in the near future!

[+ sf westcoaster]

Luka should be one very busy guy next year - like many have already said I, too, am adding him to my must see in 2010. How could I possibly pass on those yummy glutes?

[+ Lucky]

Sounds like he might be worth the $300 per hour:

 

Tastes / Specialties / Fetishes

Vanilla, Leather, Fisting, Water Sports, Anal, Oral, Shaving, Spanking, Latex, Kissing, Sneakers, Toys, Feet, Sucking off Lucky

[justaguy]

I noticed that price tag, too...after noticing other things :-). Yes, another review is needed.

[operalover21]

Just want to jump ahead and name today's coverboy Luka as being on my must see list for 2010. After the who did great in 2009 list, the who are you looking forward to list follows.

 

Absolutely. What a lovely thing to wake up to!

[+ g56whiz]

Absolutely. What a lovely thing to wake up to!

 

Wake up to? Do you honestly think you'd get any sleep with that available beside you?

[instudiocity]

He's Baack!

 

Luka is the 3/24 coverboy. 3rd review all by first-timers.

 

The newest review us a croos between advertisement and auto-eroticism.

[NYTomcat]

dont care Im thinking im with PK a definate must see in 2010. If I were hiring

[Guest greatness]

hmm

 

Never heard of him before.. He is cute though.

[whipped guy]

Luka bis...

 

Luka is the 3/24 coverboy.

Well I wake up on 3/25... and Luka is still there... if it was due to a snafu it was a good snafu... he is very easy on the eyes... and quite exquisite... and a definite consideration for when I am in a more placid mood...

 

Though I have "corrupted" a few vanilla guys on occasion... so who knows?!

[Lankypeters]

Luka's photo has been retouched. Note the white highlighting at the center of his chest, extending onto his pecs. The same techniques were applied to his biceps.

 

Of course, I'll concede, you need raw material to retouch. But it's always interesting when a working boy shows up and the muscular definition in his shots has vanished.

 

I don't think his cock and his face appear in the same shot on his Rentboy ad.

 

There are other threads lurking about here somewhere that are less than praiseworthy about his personality and performance -- and dick size, which, someone suggested, was considerably enlarged for photos.

[NYTomcat]

Damn lanky your bursting my bubble. No really thanks for the heads up. Gotta do more research

[Lankypeters]

Damn lanky your bursting my bubble. No really thanks for the heads up. Gotta do more research

 

Sorry, my friend. But isn't a heads up better than an appointment disappointing?

 

Life is a banquet and the table is loaded with goodies.

[NYTomcat]

Sorry, my friend. But isn't a heads up better than an appointment disappointing?

 

Life is a banquet and the table is loaded with goodies.

 

Without a doubt. But im so picky having a local interest rather than traveling was a nice thought. While it lasted.

[Bart]

I am certainly not encouraging to do research. Sometimes you have to try something new just to expand your horizons. My gambles tend to be a bit more pricey because of my location, either schedule and overnight or two or I have to travel several hours to and from so just want to make the trip worth my while. I have made them some with spectacular success, others just okay and still other just plain yuck

 

If you can get a reasonable email response and then talk to the individual I would go with it.

 

Positive reviews do not always follow through. Do they increase the probability of success yes. I think that is why in the positive reviews an area on the review that is often overlooked is the "who are you" section. I mean if the escort is described as versatile, you are a mature (AKA-OLD like me) bottom and describe an outstanding time with a guy. Is this valid for a top looking for a bottom, I dont know he is versatile, but the reviewer was a bottom. All I can say is I have had several blah appointments with well reviewed guys.

 

Before you ask did I write a negative review, I finally did and it was posted not too long ago and no I have no one following me with a gun or making obscene phone calls to my personal residence.

 

Do negative reviews mean you will have a terrible time, no. The response of the gentleman is of key importance here and exactly what was the issue. I have personally hired a gentleman who has had a negative review recently and I asked him about it and he was very professional in his comments to me about it. Have not met yet but scheduled in about 30 days.

 

So I guess what I am saying is that whether there are first time reviewers or long standing reviews, we all need to do our own personal soul searching and know I may get a gorgeous firm red apple that is rotten at the core and just review what may have gone wrong and go at it the next time.

[NYTomcat]

Oh you are so right Bart. Hell the same escort can give two very different experiences to different clients. So not giving up just taking my time on Mr Luka and lets see what transpires.

[+ Gar1eth]

Luka's photo has been retouched. Note the white highlighting at the center of his chest, extending onto his pecs. The same techniques were applied to his biceps.

 

Of course, I'll concede, you need raw material to retouch. But it's always interesting when a working boy shows up and the muscular definition in his shots has vanished.

 

I don't think his cock and his face appear in the same shot on his Rentboy ad.

 

There are other threads lurking about here somewhere that are less than praiseworthy about his personality and performance -- and dick size, which, someone suggested, was considerably enlarged for photos.

 

Lanky,

 

Are you sure about the retouching. I don't know anything about retouching, so I will concede to anyone who does. But there is white on his face too. It couldn't just be the lighting?

 

Gman

[Lankypeters]

the magic airbrush

 

Yes, I am sure, based on having had photos of mine --------- RETOUCHED! VIrtually all actors, models, waiters and working boys do it, subtly or blatantly.

 

The white highlights, are, as you've noticed also apparent on his face and elsewhere. His briefs glare so much you need sunglasses to look at them. Study the highlighted areas and you can see the "swaths" of the retouch.

 

You can also "downlight" -- add shadows to emphasize abs and close in the waist.

 

And, as you suggest, lighting also emphasizes.......whatever you've got to emphasize. I've no doubt this guy has the, shall we say, raw material to emphasize.

 

I've booked guys whose pictures looked ripped from the pages and covers of Men's Health. They looked fine when they pulled off their shirts, but their muscles weren't articulated nearly so sharply as in their photos.

[AdamSmith]

General note, not necessarily the case here: Besides photo retouching, creative spray tanning can also give the visual impression of physical highlights that are not there.

[whipped guy]

Lighting tricks...

 

And, as you suggest, lighting also emphasizes.......whatever you've got to emphasize. I've no doubt this guy has the, shall we say, raw material to emphasize... I've booked guys whose pictures looked ripped from the pages and covers of Men's Health. They looked fine when they pulled off their shirts, but their muscles weren't articulated nearly so sharply as in their photos.

Retouched or not Luka takes a purdy picture... as for the lighting... it is a well known fact that there are many many tricks to lighting that can make or break a photo... or even a live experience. The position, variety, tint, etc. of the lighting can be very… well I hate to use the terms deceptive or misleading… so let’s say illusory.

 

In the past week I saw a guy who was phenomenal-looking in person. He recently posted some new professionally produced pictures on his Rentboy ad and they looked even more alluring… and the pictures were taken within days of our meeting. In person the guy that I saw had an extraordinary six pack… in the photos his abs looked as though they were painstakingly sculpted by the great Michelangelo himself. In person I could most definitely feel the detail seen in his photos, but visually they did not quite have the same effect. Now as far as I could tell the differences were simply due to the lighting. Frankly, if I had hired a professional lighting designer to enhance our hotel-room experience, I am sure that I could have duplicated the result.

[NYTomcat]

OK well im booked already would someone just take the plunge and hire the Guy already. We could get our answers 1 2 3. Maybe this weekend is for more than c20. Hmmmm

[+ Axiom2001]

Absolutely. What a lovely thing to wake up to!

 

I would change the word "thing" to "man" or "individual" or "person" or "hunk" or a word which specifies a human being.