Does anybody hire escorts w/o pics anymore?

[Guest Traveler]

I've noticed that in the "Newest Reviews" section, fewer and fewer escorts are trying to advertize without pictures. I must say that it's been years since I've hired an escort without seeing what they look like first. There doesn't seem to be a reason to hire an escort sight unseen anymore (although I guess they would have to charge less). Are there any clients out there who will hire without a picture anymore? What do you require? Body shot? Head shot only? Both? Anybody need to see the man-meat?

[Guest Traveler]

I've noticed that in the "Newest Reviews" section, fewer and fewer escorts are trying to advertize without pictures. I must say that it's been years since I've hired an escort without seeing what they look like first. There doesn't seem to be a reason to hire an escort sight unseen anymore (although I guess they would have to charge less). Are there any clients out there who will hire without a picture anymore? What do you require? Body shot? Head shot only? Both? Anybody need to see the man-meat?

[Guest WetDream]

RE: Words, words, words

 

I often hire escorts from the ads in San Francisco's Bay Area Reporter. Oddly enough, I usually don't call the ones that have pictures. If they can turn me on with words, I follow up with a phone call. If they have a sexy voice and we seem to have some rapport, I set up a date. I like the surprise of seeing what the man looks like when he turns up at my door. It seems to work for me. By the way, the picture guys and the word guys are usually in the same price range.

[Guest WetDream]

RE: Words, words, words

 

I often hire escorts from the ads in San Francisco's Bay Area Reporter. Oddly enough, I usually don't call the ones that have pictures. If they can turn me on with words, I follow up with a phone call. If they have a sexy voice and we seem to have some rapport, I set up a date. I like the surprise of seeing what the man looks like when he turns up at my door. It seems to work for me. By the way, the picture guys and the word guys are usually in the same price range.

[marc anthony]

You are right... rarely will I hire without a pic. A few exceptions though. If someone like Danny in Nashville has 14 good reviews from reputable reviewers who all say that he is the cutest thing on earth even though he won't send out his pic, I'll take a gamble on that one!

[marc anthony]

You are right... rarely will I hire without a pic. A few exceptions though. If someone like Danny in Nashville has 14 good reviews from reputable reviewers who all say that he is the cutest thing on earth even though he won't send out his pic, I'll take a gamble on that one!

[Guest cp8036]

Yes, I have done so in the past, and would again.

 

I have a pretty broad range of tastes as far as physical looks. Assume a few parameters are met (age, race, size, top, btm, etc), I can tell more from a phone call than a blurred foto on the net or in a gay rag. It may sound cliche, but I find someone attractive or hot on the inside too. If he sounds fun, out to make a good time, ethical, sexy, etc., I go for it. You can tell a lot by a way a person describes himself and engages in a convesation. Some of the sexiest guys I have met are not strikingly handsome -- sexy comes from within.

 

I have seen some hot fotos for an escort in B.A.R. in SF, called the person, and within 10 seconds I eliminate him. When I ask can you tell me about yourself, and they come back with "wadda ya wanna to know" I figure he will not have a lot of good points.

 

Without exception, the guys that were the best escorts (for me) were the ones that could tell me interesting things about them (what they like, where they go, why they like to meet guys, etc). Also the escort that asks me what turns me on, what do I like, what do I expect from hiring is bound to be a good investment of money and time.

[Guest cp8036]

Yes, I have done so in the past, and would again.

 

I have a pretty broad range of tastes as far as physical looks. Assume a few parameters are met (age, race, size, top, btm, etc), I can tell more from a phone call than a blurred foto on the net or in a gay rag. It may sound cliche, but I find someone attractive or hot on the inside too. If he sounds fun, out to make a good time, ethical, sexy, etc., I go for it. You can tell a lot by a way a person describes himself and engages in a convesation. Some of the sexiest guys I have met are not strikingly handsome -- sexy comes from within.

 

I have seen some hot fotos for an escort in B.A.R. in SF, called the person, and within 10 seconds I eliminate him. When I ask can you tell me about yourself, and they come back with "wadda ya wanna to know" I figure he will not have a lot of good points.

 

Without exception, the guys that were the best escorts (for me) were the ones that could tell me interesting things about them (what they like, where they go, why they like to meet guys, etc). Also the escort that asks me what turns me on, what do I like, what do I expect from hiring is bound to be a good investment of money and time.

[OceanTraveller]

No ! I've been disappointed in the past so no more !!!!

[OceanTraveller]

No ! I've been disappointed in the past so no more !!!!

[Traveller]

Only when I'm horned out after 2 am and I'm dialing for dollars and all of the ones with the pics haven't responded. I got Chad in LA that way and he was certainly a jackpot. But it's definitely a last ditch effort these days.

 

Later.

 

PS. But Tina can be a tenacious tiger.

[Traveller]

Only when I'm horned out after 2 am and I'm dialing for dollars and all of the ones with the pics haven't responded. I got Chad in LA that way and he was certainly a jackpot. But it's definitely a last ditch effort these days.

 

Later.

 

PS. But Tina can be a tenacious tiger.

[+ Charlie]

Although I rarely hire anyone without a picture nowadays, because I hire almost exclusively from this site and there aren't many top escorts here who don't have pictures, I did hire one guy from a simple print ad in BAR last year, and was not disappointed. The most important thing for me to see beforehand is the face; I actually prefer not to see everything in advance of the meeting.

 

Before the invention of the internet, for many years I hired from tiny print ads in mags like BAR or the Advocate, and part of the excitement was not knowing what the guy would actually look like, which gave my imagination more leeway than it has now. Sometimes I got a real loser whose self-description was obviously not accurate, but more often than not the guy was different from what I had imagined, but in an acceptable way. Several times I made appointments with guys I recognized, whom I would not have hired if I had seen pictures, but once I unexpectedly got a porn star whom I had always lusted after.

[+ Charlie]

Although I rarely hire anyone without a picture nowadays, because I hire almost exclusively from this site and there aren't many top escorts here who don't have pictures, I did hire one guy from a simple print ad in BAR last year, and was not disappointed. The most important thing for me to see beforehand is the face; I actually prefer not to see everything in advance of the meeting.

 

Before the invention of the internet, for many years I hired from tiny print ads in mags like BAR or the Advocate, and part of the excitement was not knowing what the guy would actually look like, which gave my imagination more leeway than it has now. Sometimes I got a real loser whose self-description was obviously not accurate, but more often than not the guy was different from what I had imagined, but in an acceptable way. Several times I made appointments with guys I recognized, whom I would not have hired if I had seen pictures, but once I unexpectedly got a porn star whom I had always lusted after.

[Will]

I've wondered the same thing myself. While I like to see a picture, it's true that some verbal self-description will often tell me far more than those look-alike, anonymous torso shots that so many escorts use.

 

Although I can understand why an escort might be reluctant to use a face shot, I agree that the face tells far, far more than the body does. Rick Munroe and Gino Mancuso, for example, never show their faces, but the photos they use are very descriptive and far from "generic." On the whole, though, what stops me in a scan is the face, not the torso.

[Will]

I've wondered the same thing myself. While I like to see a picture, it's true that some verbal self-description will often tell me far more than those look-alike, anonymous torso shots that so many escorts use.

 

Although I can understand why an escort might be reluctant to use a face shot, I agree that the face tells far, far more than the body does. Rick Munroe and Gino Mancuso, for example, never show their faces, but the photos they use are very descriptive and far from "generic." On the whole, though, what stops me in a scan is the face, not the torso.

[Guest Kenny021]

No picture, no hire. I want to see everything: face,body, the whole enchelada. Prices are too high for me to gamble on sight unseen. I also probably wouldn't have the balls to tell someone "sorry, you don't look like someone I want".

[Guest Kenny021]

No picture, no hire. I want to see everything: face,body, the whole enchelada. Prices are too high for me to gamble on sight unseen. I also probably wouldn't have the balls to tell someone "sorry, you don't look like someone I want".

[Guest tmbg]

Your post made me think too hard :-) I reviewed in my mind all of the escorts I could remember hiring this year and can only think of one who I hired unseen. I agree there really is no reason to hire an escort without a photo these days.

 

Cheers! Ritchie

[Guest tmbg]

Your post made me think too hard :-) I reviewed in my mind all of the escorts I could remember hiring this year and can only think of one who I hired unseen. I agree there really is no reason to hire an escort without a photo these days.

 

Cheers! Ritchie

[Guest WetDream]

"I agree there really is no reason to hire an escort without a photo these days."

 

Reason not the need -- King Lear (Leer )

[Guest WetDream]

"I agree there really is no reason to hire an escort without a photo these days."

 

Reason not the need -- King Lear (Leer )

[Guest starfucker]

>

>Although I can understand why an escort might be reluctant

>to use a face shot, I agree that the face tells far, far

>more than the body does. Rick Munroe and Gino Mancuso, for

>example, never show their faces, but the photos they use are

>very descriptive and far from "generic." On the whole,

>though, what stops me in a scan is the face, not the torso.

 

I like a kissable face but it doesn't matter all that much when it's buried in a pillow, muffling the cries of passion!

[Guest starfucker]

>

>Although I can understand why an escort might be reluctant

>to use a face shot, I agree that the face tells far, far

>more than the body does. Rick Munroe and Gino Mancuso, for

>example, never show their faces, but the photos they use are

>very descriptive and far from "generic." On the whole,

>though, what stops me in a scan is the face, not the torso.

 

I like a kissable face but it doesn't matter all that much when it's buried in a pillow, muffling the cries of passion!

[Traveller]

But ya know Wet, sometimes I'm faxed a particularly good CV by a pictureless escort and then all bets are off. If there are no gaps, he's golden.

 

Later.