Fin Fang Foom forces his bigotry on everyone.

[Guest TruthTeller]

I think you're exhibiting some stalking behavior. Try to resist responding to at least one of my posts, just to prove you can do it.

 

Shouldn't you be out selling your hole or something?

[Guest Zach DC]

Hey Deej,

 

You make accusations but neglect to mention who you are accusing.

 

Before responding, I need to be clear - who are you talking to?

 

Zach DC

[CT Dick]

>It's amusing to see that he's being applauded by one or

>two posters who in the past have chided others for

>being "judgmental." Apparently, the question whether >being "judgmental" is good or bad depends on

>whether the person on the receiving end is someone you

>like. That's as I always suspected.

>:-)

 

Pickwick, the difference here is that Zach attacked what FFF has written, not attacked him. (unlike the nasty cracks posted a few inches above this comment)

 

Dick

[Guest Zach DC]

Hey BenDover,

You don't how much I appreciate your words (so I'll tell you). I'm flattered and grateful. Thanks you so much.

And thanks for addressing the issue. Bigotry is not something to ignore and hope it goes away. Like you suggest,

by speaking calmly, we invite intelligent discussion. We achieve wise solutions. It's our best way to stop bigotry.

 

Zach DC

[Guest Zach DC]

Thanks Tampa Yankee, you big sweetie.

 

Zach DC

[Guest TruthTeller]

> And thanks for addressing the

>issue. Bigotry is not something

>to ignore and hope it

>goes away. Like you

>suggest,

> by speaking calmly, we invite

>intelligent discussion. We achieve wise

>solutions. It's our best way

>to stop bigotry.

 

Since you have professed the vital importance of speaking out against bigotry, I was hoping you could tell me what you mean by "bigotry."

[Guest JT]

>bbkk: Shouldn't <name> be unmoderated?

>deej: Yep

>Barry: I agree

>Losgatan: Me too

>HooBoy: Done.

 

Hey deej, do you mean Daddy has no say in all these? What a shocking revealation! And all these times people think he's God...

 

JT

[Guest duncan]

>How appropriate from an old escort.

> Next -- just to

>complete the cycle -- you

>should offer up a fat

>bit of wisdom, followed by

>a bald prediction.

 

T2,

 

You are an evil, bitchy, misanthrope with a sense of humor from Hell. I think I'm in love!

 

Duncan

[Guest WetDream]

RE: All About TruthTeller

 

TT: You play a very good Eve Harrington to FFF's Margo Channing. Just remember what happened to her at the end.

[Scorpio]

RE: All About TruthTeller

 

Fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a bumpy night. - Margo Channing :-)

[Guest pickwick]

>Pickwick, the difference here is that

>Zach attacked what FFF has

>written, not attacked him.

>(unlike the nasty cracks posted

>a few inches above this

>comment)

 

That is quite untrue. The names I quoted from his post were clearly applied to FFF rather than to his post.

[Guest pickwick]

>>That's as I

>>always suspected.

 

>Pickwick...Is that really as you "always

>expected"?

 

No, it's as I always "suspected." The two words are not synonyms.

 

>And is this a

>good or bad judgment on

>your part? It really doesn't

>matter.

 

Maybe not to you. But the hypocrisy of the righteous (perhaps I should say "of the self-righteous") always amuses me.

 

 

>Everything Zach said regarding FFF was

>warranted. FFF has brought this

>upon himself.

 

Brought what upon himself? Getting yelled at for posting hateful words by someone who has been guilty of exactly the same thing?

 

>I find it

>especially interesting that he stopped

>posting as soon as I

>sent a message to his

>inbox informing him that I

>knew his true identity.

 

That sounds as though you were threatening him. I wouldn't have thought you'd do something like that.

 

>Oh, and "GARDEN-variety coward" is practically

>a clue as to who

>

>FFF really is. I'm sure he's

>still slithering around somewhere here...posting

>under one or the other

>of his multiple personalities.

 

I'm afraid that "clue" went right past me. But it doesn't really matter.

 

I find a number of things about this thread absurd, but more absurd than any other element of it is the use of the word "forces" in the title. Someone needs to explain to me how anyone is being "forced" to read this guy's posts. Why whine and complain about doing something that is totally, completely, always and eternally v-o-l-u-n-t-a-r-y?

[HooBoy]

The Real Story On Fin Fang Foom

 

I want to thank Zack for his well thought out, cleverly crafted and interesting discourse on bigotry.

 

Folks, there is more here than meets the eye on Fin Fang Foom and it borders on sinister. He has taunted a New York escort publicly about talking with him, tried to reveal personal information, which I deleted about this escort. But it goes further than that. He has written similar taunting email messages to this escort, which are chilling and remind me of the movie “Klute”. (An award winning movie that was before most of our escort's time.)

 

Daddy-In-Training has been spending an inordinate amount of time determining exactly who Fin Fang Foom is and we are VERY close to narrowing it down. The only reason I am posting this is because Fin Fang Foom is more than a bigot – he is sinister and if I may quote from another movie, “Meet The Parents,” I just want FFF to know, “we have our eyes on you, mister.” And if you post under another name, we’ll be on that, too.

 

HooBoy

Email: HooBoy@male4malescorts.com

[Guest jeffOH]

>No, it's as I always "suspected."

> The two words are

>not synonyms.

 

Picwick...Yes they are. They BOTH can mean "to guess". Which is what you were doing.

 

 

>Brought what upon himself? Getting

>yelled at for posting hateful

>words by someone who has

>been guilty of exactly the

>same thing?

 

FFF has usually been the instigator. He purposely chooses words intended to incite negativity. I've usually chosen to ignore such

things because I prefer to discuss the issues civilly and not attack individuals. He is especially deserving of what has been

said.

 

>>I find it

>>especially interesting that he stopped

>>posting as soon as I

>>sent a message to his

>>inbox informing him that I

>>knew his true identity.

>

>That sounds as though you were

>threatening him. I wouldn't

>have thought you'd do something

>like that.

 

I never threatened him in any way and you are right, I wouldn't

do something like that.

 

>>Oh, and "GARDEN-variety coward" is practically

>>a clue as to who

>>FFF really is. I'm sure he's

>>still slithering around somewhere here...posting

>>under one or the other

>>of his multiple personalities.

>

>I'm afraid that "clue" went right

>past me. But it

>doesn't really matter.

 

Nancy Drew you aren't. It was merely a coincidence that Zach used

the term "garden-variety". I just thought it was amusing that it

he used a word that could possibly be a clue. And you're right, it doesn't really matter if you got it or not.

 

>I find a number of things

>about this thread absurd, but

>more absurd than any other

>element of it is the

>use of the word "forces"

>in the title. Someone

>needs to explain to me

>how anyone is being "forced"

>to read this guy's posts.

> Why whine and complain

>about doing something that is

>totally, completely, always and eternally

>v-o-l-u-n-t-a-r-y?

 

What I find "absurd" is how anyone could even remotely try to defend FFF. Zach started this thread to have a civil discussion

about bigotry. I'm sorry that I responded to your post in the manner that I did...getting off-topic.

 

Anyway, Hooboy's on the case. I have a feeling we won't be hearing much from FinFangFoom anymore.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[Bilbo]

Yes, I am a proud older bear who's been in the profession off and on since 1975. However, for a good quote from something bald, you'd have to talk to Joey's cock. Which wouldn't be a bad idea, anyway.

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

RE: The Real Story On Fin Fang Foom

 

Hello boys and girls.

 

I haven't forgotten all of you. I'm working on a post that should clear everything up and stop all of this silly "sinister" talk.

 

Anticipatorily yours,

 

FFF

[Guest pickwick]

>Picwick...Yes they are. They BOTH can

>mean "to guess". Which is

>what you were doing.

>

 

My dictionary (Merriam-Webster) says they aren't. And I agree with it.

 

>FFF has usually been the instigator.

>He purposely chooses words intended

>to incite negativity. I've usually

>chosen to ignore such

>things because I prefer to discuss

>the issues civilly and not

>attack individuals. He is especially

>deserving of what has been

>

>said.

 

 

The fact that he always begins his threads with his own name ("Fin Fang Foom Says . . . .") makes them extremely easy to ignore. So why don't you just do that? Who "forces" you to deal with his posts? I asked that question earlier but I got no response.

 

>I never threatened him in any

>way and you are right,

>I wouldn't

>do something like that.

 

So what was the point of sending him a message stating that you know his real identity? To make him feel secure? You wouldn't have been "taunting" him, would you?

 

>Nancy Drew you aren't.

 

I'm not a "Nancy" of any sort. Please keep that in mind.

:-)

 

 

>What I find "absurd" is how

>anyone could even remotely try

>to defend FFF.

 

Funny how everyone is always in favor of free speech, until he comes across some speech that he finds offensive. There are so many people in our society who find what the escorts and clients who visit this site do and say to be deeply offensive that I would think they'd be the last people in the world to want to censor anyone. But if I ever thought that I was obviously quite wrong.

 

 

>Zach started

>this thread to have a

>civil discussion

>about bigotry. I'm sorry that I

>responded to your post in

>the manner that I did...getting

>off-topic.

 

If Zach wanted to have a civil discussion about any subject I guess he shouldn't have engaged in all the namecalling he did. I don't see much difference between him and the person he criticizes.

 

>Anyway, Hooboy's on the case. I

>have a feeling we won't

>be hearing much from FinFangFoom

>anymore.

 

I'm sure you're right. For almost every group, a time comes when some of the members try to exclude opinions that don't please them.

[Traveller]

RE: The Real Story On Fin Fang Foom

 

Colonel Mustard in the library with a gun. Do I win?

 

Later.

 

PS. DickHo, another sesh with Jason Tyler in Boston. A looker, a bod, a big dick and had hilarious stories of manning the Falcon booth at Castro Street Fair. Gotta be on your to do list.

[Guest 7Zach]

Sorry, but not stalking. It's just that I find the overwhelming majority of your posts to be offensive. Not to mention your insufferable superiority in giving bad legal analysis; when questioned about it, you remain silent, but continue to denigrate other posters in your usual bullying way. And you take particular offense if I just reply to you with your own words, i.e., "cute but tiresome".

There's a YMCA school of law in Tennessee, did you go there? or was it mail order?

[Guest jeffOH]

>My dictionary (Merriam-Webster) says they aren't.

 

If we're going to nitPICK, how about this. I grew up hearing

"expected as much" used to mean "suspected". It is a colloquialism and says so in my Webster's New World dictionary.

I realize not everybody grew up in Appalachia.

 

>The fact that he always begins

>his threads with his own

>name ("Fin Fang Foom Says

>. . . .") makes

>them extremely easy to ignore.

> So why don't you

>just do that? Who

>"forces" you to deal with

>his posts? I asked

>that question earlier but I

>got no response.

 

I never said he "forces" me to deal with his posts. I usually ignore them, but when he called me a liar I'd had enough and decided to respond in a manner with which he's all too familiar.

 

 

>What was the point of

>sending him a message stating

>that you know his real

>identity? To make him

>feel secure? You wouldn't

>have been "taunting" him, would

>you?

 

You assume my motivation here. I was merely informing him. His

insecurity or security were of no concern to me.

 

>>Nancy Drew you aren't.

>

>I'm not a "Nancy" of any

>sort. Please keep that

>in mind.

>:-)

 

Ok, OK already, how about a "detective you aren't".

 

 

>Funny how everyone is always in

>favor of free speech, until

>he comes across some speech

>that he finds offensive.

>There are so many people

>in our society who find

>what the escorts and clients

>who visit this site do

>and say to be deeply

>offensive that I would think

>they'd be the last people

>in the world to want

>to censor anyone. But

>if I ever thought that

>I was obviously quite wrong.

 

Nobody has mentioned the word censor, but you.

 

 

>If Zach wanted to have a

>civil discussion about any subject

>I guess he shouldn't have

>engaged in all the namecalling

>he did. I don't

>see much difference between him

>and the person he criticizes.

 

I think there's a big difference here that's quite obvious to most of the posters on this site.

 

>I'm sure you're right. For

>almost every group, a time

>comes when some of the

>members try to exclude opinions

>that don't please them.

 

No, the time has come to expose him for his hypocrisy.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[Guest pickwick]

>I realize not everybody grew up

>in Appalachia.

 

Yes, thank goodness.

 

>I never said he "forces" me

>to deal with his posts.

>I usually ignore them, but

>when he called me a

>liar I'd had enough and

>decided to respond in a

>manner with which he's all

>too familiar.

 

If you were ignoring his posts, what occasion was there for him to call you a liar? I think he can only have called you that because you decided not to ignore his posts but to get into it with him. So it was your decision, right?

 

>You assume my motivation here. I

>was merely informing him. His

>

>insecurity or security were of no

>concern to me.

 

So you went to the trouble of sending him a private email telling him that you know his real identity for informational purposes only? I see.

 

 

>Nobody has mentioned the word censor,

>but you.

 

I know that. Do we need to have that discussion about euphemisms all over again?

 

>I think there's a big difference

>here that's quite obvious to

>most of the posters on

>this site.

 

If it's so obvious then you should have no trouble explaining it to me. Because I really don't see it. Namecalling is namecalling. People who think it's wrong shouldn't do it. People who do it themselves shouldn't complain when others do it. I can think of very few frequent posters who haven't been guilty of it, not including thee and me. The only differences are differences of degree.

 

>No, the time has come to

>expose him for his hypocrisy.

 

Which is what, exactly?

[Bilbo]

I meant Joey C. that time. He has the most delightfully fully shaved cock I remember seeing in the reviews in ages.

Just thought that I would mention that it is perfectly OK for TT to try to insult me anytime. It seems to have caused a 50% swell in the number of hits to my site.

But, of course, I shouldn't be too surprised. The only negative reviews I remember seeing about an escort being old or fat were when he was older and fatter than the client had been expecting. When an escort is honest about his looks, there seems to be a definite niche market for my type.

So, TT, please don't throw me in that briar patch. Please don't make me work for 21 times the minimum wage any more! ;P)