Is Today's Review of Big Red Fake?

[+ Gar1eth]

Ok--I hate to point fingers, but both of the 2 reviews are by "men of color". I'm not saying that there aren't a lot of Black male clients hiring--but if they do, they don't all mention that they are Black in their self-description.

 

Also in the demographic section that the client provides on the escort, the capitalization is the same as in the 1st review.

 

So I have to wonder whether the review is fake or whether possibly the same client has reviewed Big Red twice under 2 different aliases?

 

Gman

[Guest RandyRon]

Way too many similarities in these two reviews. In both, the reviewer describes himself as tall and blk (not black). In one the reviewer "loves to be in the company of tall....." and in the other "enjoy the company of masc......" How many of us clients use the terms "company of?" I'm afraid I'd have to put these reviews in the bogus category.

[+ Charlie]

It seems unlikely that an escort writing his own reviews would make them so similar, unless he were trying to telegraph the news that he wants a very specific (and very limited) clientele. Instead, it does sound like the same client has written both reviews--what is the probability that the only clients to write reviews would be "tall blk" bottoms who focus entirely on getting fucked by a very big dick? The length, style, vocabulary and content of the two reviews indicate a single client with two handles.

[FinFangFoom]

>It seems unlikely that an escort writing his own reviews

>would make them so similar

 

 

Right, since the majority of worker bees are known for their keen intellects.

 

This is a perfect time to apply Occam's Razor.

 

Logically yours,

 

FFF

[Guest DickHo]

Occam's Razor, APA Style...boy, we are very sophiscated this week.

 

For those that don't know Occam's Razor, it can be paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one."

 

Impressed,

Dick

[FinFangFoom]

>For those that don't know Occam's Razor, it can be paraphrased

>as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be

>the best one."

 

 

ergo, the wwhore wrote his own reviews.

 

Decidedly yours,

 

FFF

[+ Charlie]

Occam's Razor was intended for situations in which there is an obvious difference in complexity between two explanations, but in this case each explanation is pretty simple, with plenty of previous examples. It is also only a general principle to be used when there is no evidence to determine which of two or more explanations is correct (William of Ockham didn't claim that the simplest explanation is always the right one). FFF's conclusion is based on the assumption that escorts, in general, are not very bright, and that Big Red must conform to this type, but he adduces no evidence for either assumption.

[+ Gar1eth]

>Occam's Razor was intended for situations in which there is

>an obvious difference in complexity between two explanations,

>but in this case each explanation is pretty simple, with

>plenty of previous examples. It is also only a general

>principle to be used when there is no evidence to determine

>which of two or more explanations is correct (William of

>Ockham didn't claim that the simplest explanation is always

>the right one). FFF's conclusion is based on the assumption

>that escorts, in general, are not very bright, and that Big

>Red must conform to this type, but he adduces no evidence for

>either assumption.

 

 

adduce

One entry found.

 

adduce

 

 

 

Main Entry: ad·duce

Pronunciation: \ə-ˈdüs also -ˈdyüs\

Function: transitive verb

Inflected Form(s): ad·duced; ad·duc·ing

Etymology: Middle English, from Latin adducere, literally, to lead to, from ad- + ducere to lead — more at tow

Date: 15th century

: to offer as example, reason, or proof in discussion or analysis

— ad·duc·er noun

 

 

 

 

Logophile Gman

 

log•o•phile

 

Pronunciation: (lô'gu-fīl", log'u-), [key]

—n.

a lover of words.

[Okliehomo]

This site is so fucking educational...

 

Never heard the word "adduce" and as for the whole razor thing, really? Very fascinating stuff, boys.

 

And to think I only lurk around here to talk about cock and ass.

 

We's sure is shallow here in Oklahoma. I started to say Bumfuck, but we all know what the genus (genisis?) of that word is. More like Bumlick, for me then..

 

Speaking of, it has occurred to me that in the post about the escort trying to take a guy's dick for an hour and a half and then calling it painfully quits...you know, the one in which Juan threatened to give everyone a very "harsh spanking.."....in which someone very clever said something like, "it would hurt an escort more in the wallet, than it would for him to take a little rectum stretch..."

 

Just wanted to let you all know, that that's where I live...in Rectum Stretch, OK....

 

I am sure that most of you have suspected as much all along.

 

Okie

[FinFangFoom]

>FFF's conclusion is based on the assumption

>that escorts, in general, are not very bright, and that Big

>Red must conform to this type, but he adduces no evidence for

>either assumption.

 

That was not my conclusion. You're mixing two different things.

 

I contend that the logical reason for two FIRST TIME reviewers having multiple similarites is because the same person wrote them. Using Occam's Razor, with all things being equal, the simplest reason for two reviewers sounding the same is because they ARE the same person.

 

duh

 

As for the second point, I was merely saying that stupid people do stupid things and if you're in search of Mensa candidates, I wouldn't look on Rentboy.

 

Clearly yours,

 

FFF

[+ Charlie]

Aha! You are correct: I misread your comment to mean that it was the escort who wrote the reviews.

[+ Axiom2001]

I read the reviews and decided from the very beginning that the client wrote his second review of "Big Red." What gives here, men?

[FinFangFoom]

>Aha! You are correct: I misread your comment to mean that it

>was the escort who wrote the reviews.

 

 

Aha! You're incorrect however your observation throws a wrench into my conclusion so now I must amend it.

 

I WAS saying that Red wrote both of them however, I didn't consider the possibilty that the same john wrote both reviews.

 

hmmmmm, the plot thickens......

 

Actually, we can't know for sure which scenario is the correct one. However, the evidence is compelling that it's either the worker bee or the john who wrote both.

 

Where's Poirot when you need him?

 

Oh yeah - dead.

 

Investigatively yours,

 

FFF

[+ Charlie]

Okie, we have to have threads like this occasionally to uphold our contention that the purpose of this website is educational enhancement (rather than phallic enhancement).

[best hotel]

...whoever wrote the review....i can assure you,...as a regular of his, big red is the real thing....one sexy, hung, beautiful, masterful, hot, smart, bohemian, artistic top.....my heart pounds just thinking about him...i wrote a review but it never appeared

[best hotel]

Hi, I'm Big Red!

 

I'm with the client who wrote the previous posting, otherwise none of this would have been brought to my attention.

 

I have more than two Black clients, I don't discriminate and I live in NYC so it's not an unusual circumstance.

 

I studied screenwriting at NYU so I value my skills as a writer, I wouldn't waste them writing fake reviews.

 

One of these clients is a Vietnam Veteran, the other is a baggage handler; both had limited educations. I think the second client copied much of the first review simply because his writing skills are limited and he found it difficult. Several clients with stronger writing skills have submitted reviews which have gone unpublished; why "daddy" is choosing to only post reviews from Black men is a mystery to me. Perhaps someone could bring this matter up with him at some point.

 

It bothers me that I have only two reviews which appear so similar that their authenticity would be questioned, but I have no control over what my clients write or which reviews get posted. Sorry. I'm real.

[humphry]

RE: Is Today's Review of Big Red Fake?.....Occam's Razor

 

Strictly speaking, Occam's Razor tells us that "entities ought not to be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem)-- that is, that explanations that depend on many factors are less likely to be correct or true than those that depend on fewer.

Just so you know...

[doctordoctor]

well that's weird....

 

hotel writes a response saying that Big Red is a good guy and has met him and he's great

 

then hotel gives a response that he is, in fact, Big Red himself and the two reviewers are clients of him, blah, blah.....

 

these could be genuine reviews, but what is going on??.....

[+ Charlie]

I think you have misread the second post: BigRed says he is "with" best hotel and apparently using bh's access to the MB to respond (he's probably not a member).

[best hotel]

....i can assure you charlie, i am not big red...wish i had his beauty and his big dick, however....my life may have turned out differently....he was just posting under my access

[Luv2play]

And you call yourself doctordoctor??? (Or does that mean you are in need of one?)It was obvious that besthotel allowed bigred to write a response to explain why two black guys might have posted similar reviews. I find it entirely credible, particularly since besthotel is a known reviewer on this board and also a contributor to the MC.

[JT Brooklyn]

This Reviewer Nbr 2 copying Nbr 1 has happened before...So this does make sense to JT also.

 

Big Red" does have some SEXY Pix's that definitely bring out the Horn Dog in ME!

 

And I usually am not into SIZE as the Deal Maker!

 

I'm wondering if Best Hotel was "Sitting on the Monster" while Red was typing away! That seems Hot! LOL :P

[best hotel]

jt....actually, i watched him type first as i sat on the floor between his legs, gently kissing his dick,...the sucking and fucking happened later....seriously, he is alot of fun...brings to mind the writers and artists who hung out in the east village in the early seventies....very smart....very skilled lover who can sweet-talk and be very romantic...great kisser..romantic....and loves to fuck face- to- face...a real find....

[Luv2play]

>I'm wondering if Best Hotel was "Sitting on the Monster" while

>Red was typing away! That seems Hot! LOL :P

 

That gives a whole new meaning to "laptop:!! }(

[JT Brooklyn]

best...Congrats! Big Red seem's like the type that is very hard to find these day's...Especially in NYC.

 

The Quantity due to Economic's has gone Up..BUT the Quality hasn't really. Some Guy's are still coasting along on Long Past Review's of what they were when they started out! LOL

 

You find a Guy that "Work's It" well, being a Regular is the best way to go. At least you know you will getting something back for the NOW Exspensive Investment. :P