Cover boy for 5/16

[seaboy4hire]

Um can someone please explain why there is a ts as cover boy? I am usually all about eaqual opportunity but this is a males escort site. Not a transexual escort site. There were a few really good looking guys that definately should have been the cover boy over a ts. I just don't get it.

 

Hugs,

Greg

[email protected] http://seaboy4hire.tripod.com

West Hollywood,Ca May 19-21

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b310/NobodyKnowsMe/sinz.gif

[+ deej]

Daddy does strive for diversity in the coverboys.

[seaboy4hire]

I really wish I could fully embrace this new found diversity but I am really having a hard time with it. I thought that this was male 4 male escorts. Not transsexual 4 male esocts. Maybe I am just falling behind.

 

Hugs,

Greg

[email protected] http://seaboy4hire.tripod.com

West Hollywood,Ca May 19-21

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b310/NobodyKnowsMe/sinz.gif

[brentt]

oh dude I totally agree with you ,I'm an escort shane formerly brentt in charleston s.c., and it's good to have diversity but if you or I tried to put an add on the erose gude ,one of the top escorting sites for transexuals , they wouldn't let us, but look at some of the ts girls on men4rent. Now people could say well their are a lot of guys who like men who also like transies, because they have a dick but I could turn that around and say their are also a lot of men who like trannies (and also women) who like men as well because obviously we have dicks lol , but I can't be on thier sites as a man so why should they be on our male sites as transies

[brentt]

but at he same time daddy is trying something different so I have to give him credit for that

[excelntsvc]

sorry guy .. diversity be damned .. for my money, this site is not about trannies

[+ Axiom2001]

When I first viewed yesterday's "CB of the Day," I had planned to begin a thread but thought otherwise. The ts did ABSOLUTELY nothing for me, so I just glanced and scrolled down to read and view other reviews about the male escorts who were featured yesterday.

 

I agree with the originator of the thread and thank him for beginning some type of dialogue. Many times I have tacitly disagreed with some of the selections of the guys who've been selected "Cover-Man-of-the-Day," but since it is not my website, I've remained mute. But again, I applaud that a thread came about today and that some discussion has begun.

[Luv2play]

I found the picture to be a rude intrusion into what had begun as a pleasant day but then, I've suffered far ruder intrusions in my life. So I just moved on.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Cover (boy) for 5/16

 

I can just picture Daddy's laugh when he came across this pic for coverboy.

[Funseeker 22]

RE: Cover (boy) for 5/16

 

Looks to me like the review was written by the Cover Boy/Girl.

[pierrot]

My two cents: the ts is a BIG turnoff. Yuck.

[+ ArVaGuy]

My first inclination was to double check the calendar and make sure it was not April Fool's Day.

[kevininsa]

I'd like to put my 2 cents in if I may regarding the 5/16 cover.

 

I'm all about diversity too... but in this case....

 

BLEAH!

 

KevinInSA

[OneFinger]

Perhaps it is "Sweeps Week" for male escort sites and Daddy is trying to raise the stats by going for shock value. :+

 

It takes a lot to make me feel unfortable but that Cover "Boy" did it. I have a couple of M2F TS friends and one that is currently in transition. But I have no desire to think of them as a potential sexual partner. I've got to agree that this was even too much for me. x(

[jasoncarter_dfw]

T-Girls have their own review forums, shemaleescortreview.com and theeroticreview.net.

 

- Jason Carter - Dallas, TX

- [email protected]

- (972) 365-0120