Scott Adler

[BewareofNick]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Rose, dear, I haven't had anything to do with Nick for something like three years I believe. I am glad though to continue to be able to fuel your masturbation fantasies.

[woodlawn]

>Woody, when Conway says "we", he's referring to his multiple

>personalities and/or his stuffed animals.

 

Is that right? I thought he was suffering from the delusion that he's the Queen of England, rather than a two-bit prostitute.

[BewareofNick]

>>Woody, when Conway says "we", he's referring to his

>multiple

>>personalities and/or his stuffed animals.

>

>Is that right? I thought he was suffering from the delusion

>that he's the Queen of England, rather than a two-bit

>prostitute.

 

Suffering from the delusion of being a Queen for sure. Why one would almost think that Conway is our little ol Scott Evil.

 

Muwahahahah!

[twinklover]

A cat scratching a post to sharpen its claws; a dog biting its chew-toy to exercise its teeth; a boxer punching his bag to hit harder. On and on it goes, with the unfortunate "victims"--the post, the chew-toy, the punching bag--not even realizing what they are.

 

As for Scott Adler, I do not find him unattractive and I believe in his flexibility but I would refrain from hiring him because he finds it all so "disgusting" (his very revealing words).

[Guest Conway]

The paranoia was running deep at 4:30 am in the mental ward last night. Now, I'm Scott Adler.

 

Thank God. It looks as though they got all of the patients medicated and back to bed shortly thereafter.

 

It was 4:30 am and you freaks were obsessing over me while I slept.

 

OCD! OCD! OCD!

[Traveller]

>You see, Woody, the problem is this: If one goes on the

>board and notes the timing of your posts and "Travellers"

>posts last nigh, it only becomes all the more supportive of

>the fact that the person who uses those two handles

>interchangably has no socializtion outside of the internet.

 

Woodman,

 

Another stupidfuck has "found" clues which verify that we're the same poster. Granted we're both as smart as they come, but get lives, idiotfreaks. Discontinue studying numerology and any other useless fads.

 

I was on the Cape helping a friend set up to film a pilot for the networks for the last few days. I seriously doubt W-Man was anywhere near there. Now, nice to say, there was more talent there than usual, but not nearly as much as on the Island the weekend before. On a side note, we went to see Ellen Greene, who's stutter has made her competely unintelligible. Poor thing.

 

Dickhead, check with Daddy. He can verify that we're not the same dude. Both unbelievably smart and witty, but not the same poster, dumbfuck. This gets fucking boring. It makes the posts on Eileen Brennan's birthdays seem interesting.

 

Later.

[Doug69]

>Another stupidfuck has "found" clues which verify that we're

>the same poster. Granted we're both as smart as they come,

>but get lives, idiotfreaks. Discontinue studying numerology

>and any other useless fads.

 

If there is one thing in life of which I am absolutely, completely certain, it is NOT that the world is round or that the earth revolves around the sun or that we are all going to die.

 

Nope, it's none of those things. The thing about which I am most certain is that Woodlawn and Traveller are not the same person. And the level of stupidity and lack of awareness required to believe that they are is truly breathtaking.

 

I believe that this whole idiocy originated - as so much idiocy does - with Lucky (the same place they learned that I own a website for hairy guys and I used to be an escort). The people who are laboring under these absurd misconceptions are in that predicament because they seem to be listening to Lucky. Come to think of it, anyone who listens to anything Lucky has to say is proving their abject stupidity without the need for anything further, right Woodlawn/Traveller?

[Guest Conway]

You're just the kind of fucking legitimate source that we rely on to verify things for us. Thanks for 75 words of nothing.

[Guest Conway]

Where there's smoke, there's fire. You're just one of the pack of liars. What on earth makes you think that you have an ounce of credibility here after the way you have attacked this site and its posters?

 

And, next time, save the gay travelogue for somebody who gives a shit what you do with your time. If you could shoot a ping pong ball out of your ass, that combined with your Cape experience might just impress me.

[Traveller]

>Where there's smoke, there's fire. You're just one of the

>pack of liars. What on earth makes you think that you have an

>ounce of credibility here after the way you have attacked this

>site and its posters?

>

>And, next time, save the gay travelogue for somebody who gives

>a shit what you do with your time. If you could shoot a ping

>pong ball out of your ass, that combined with your Cape

>experience might just impress me.

 

If you hold your breath when you jump up and down, it's much more effective. Try this next time, w***e.

 

Have a nice night.

 

Later.

[woodlawn]

>Where there's smoke, there's fire. You're just one of the

>pack of liars.

 

And this accusation is coming from someone who keeps pretending he has some sort of medical qualification to diagnose mental illness, when in reality he couldn't even diagnose a hangnail?

 

 

>What on earth makes you think that you have an

>ounce of credibility here after the way you have attacked this

>site and its posters?

 

If you're talking to me, that is exactly what makes me think I have credibility.

 

>And, next time, save the gay travelogue for somebody who gives

>a shit what you do with your time. If you could shoot a ping

>pong ball out of your ass, that combined with your Cape

>experience might just impress me.

 

You have it backwards. The clients are not here to impress the prostitutes. It's the other way around.

[SAdler]

Yes I'm back. Wow. A whole thread? I'm touched, really

 

How on EARTH have I been dishonest though?

[SAdler]

Speaking of which I need my book back

[SAdler]

It's not advertising unless I start the threat. I'm not some political pac that people's altruism indirectly benefits them. I don't have a clause in my reviews that says, "Talk me up in the message board and get an hour free. "

 

Honestly, where does all this bitterness come from?

[SAdler]

::bearhug::

[SAdler]

Is it next Friday yet? Yeesh. I was all excited to catch up on this board and I'm already bored.

 

OOooh, now I'm going all Motormouth Mabel and rhyming, let's just pray my next response doesn't require me to sing.

 

But seriously. Thanks Joel. Always fun to have someone as fun as you in my corner.

[twobitsfourbits]

You get what you give Scottie. That's life.

 

Of course you're advertising, as you could have easily let this thread die a quiet death, but you continued to resurrect it in the hopes of squeezing out a few more glances.

[SAdler]

it was resurrected? the way I found it was typing my name into a search and I saw a thread with my name on it that I didn't even know about.

 

As to getting what I give....how on earth could that possibly apply to me? While I may embody Regina in the real world, the Mean Girls of this board have severely violated the meaning behind an otherwise entertaining movie.

[BewareofNick]

>Yes I'm back. Wow. A whole thread? I'm touched, really

>

>How on EARTH have I been dishonest though?

 

Now now, Scotty, playing coy just doesn't jive with your personality.

 

A while back, we discovered escort ads for you. You have stated quite vociferously that you NEVER take out ads anywhere and that you only advertise your services here on this site. When confronted with the evidence of your dishonesty, you stated that pictures in your ad were taken when you were underage and that you never posted them. Yet, somehow, whoever posted your ads got ahold of your pictures when you were underage and was sufficiently psychic enough to know that you would become a manw*h*0*r*e and what your phone number and e-mail address would be in the future.

 

The correct response would have been yes, I did place those ads when I was 18 (I've fudged my age a little here and there) and I did it before I knew of Hooboy's site. Once I started getting reviews though I stopped placing ads but the people who run the escort site never would pull them down.

 

The other part was when you stated that you never negotiate your rates and went into a long drawn out solioquy about how its degrading to do so and blah blah blah ad nauseum. Well, in the above mentioned ads, you stated that rates are negotiable. You yourself have offered to negotiate your rates if johns would take you to a show, etc etc. in this very message center. I am sure that was why you left here for a while because you had degraded yourself so thoroughly.

 

How on EARTH have you NOT been dishonest?

[BewareofNick]

>As to getting what I give....how on earth could that possibly

>apply to me? While I may embody Regina in the real world, the

>Mean Girls of this board have severely violated the meaning

>behind an otherwise entertaining movie.

 

Severely violated? Is there a fine? JAIL TIME? The horrors!! You have made yourself a legitimate target of the "Mean Girls" due to your blatant hypcorisy and dishonesty. You have most certainly brought this on yourself.

[BewareofNick]

I am sure the fact that he just posted in the Escort Travels section about a trip to NYC had nothing to do with it whatsoever.

[SAdler]

LOL. That just proves that I've had a reason to just be coming back to the message boards. In other words, it just hasn't been WORTH my time to date. Of course BoN (and this has been the case) if there was a thread about you you'd feel the need to comment on it

[SAdler]

>Severely violated? Is there a fine? JAIL TIME? The

>horrors!! You have made yourself a legitimate target of the

>"Mean Girls" due to your blatant hypcorisy and dishonesty.

>You have most certainly brought this on yourself.

 

Not denying that the Mean Girls have opted to target me. I'm neither a Church nor a Mean Girl, just speaking my opinion which was what I interpreted to be the original point of these boards.

 

Again that word DISHONESTY. Will someone please explain what I've been dishonest ABOUT? Oh yeah, and unlike some people I'm not going to bitch at you about your typo, I know what you meant. But at the same time, have NO clue what HYPOCRISY you are referring to

 

What I'm saying I haven't brought on myself are people making bitchy comments to good people as in the case of 2004's foundationless petty remark to Joel.

[BewareofNick]

Scott see post #68 above, if you're capable that is.

[SAdler]

>A while back, we discovered escort ads for you. You have

>stated quite vociferously that you NEVER take out ads anywhere

>and that you only advertise your services here on this site.

>When confronted with the evidence of your dishonesty, you

>stated that pictures in your ad were taken when you were

>underage and that you never posted them.

 

Yes precisely. YOU discovered ads which I had no knowledge about and I never did extend my gratitude to you for that. I'm not denying I have a healthy appetite for promiscuity. I was practicing safe and consensual, though probably not legal due to my age, sex when I was 15. I’m not denying that. I do regret that I was young and stupid and took nudes (unphotoshopped no less) pictures and sent them to people blindly putting faith in people to be discreet. I’ve realized there are assholes (no present company remarks required) in the world and I just have to deal with them.

 

>Yet, somehow, whoever posted your ads got ahold of your pictures >when you were underage and was sufficiently psychic enough to know >that you would become a manw*h*0*r*e and what your phone number and

>e-mail address would be in the future.

 

If you notice my escorting history I have NEVER posted my phone number and have not used that email address in YEARS. That is EASILY, again, a hookup who was out to screw with me.

 

>The correct response would have been yes, I did place those

>ads when I was 18 (I've fudged my age a little here and there)

>and I did it before I knew of Hooboy's site. Once I started

>getting reviews though I stopped placing ads but the people

>who run the escort site never would pull them down.

 

It's no shock for me to say that I've been escorting since I was 16 and a half. Yes girls get out your calculators I just turned 21 this month. The people who run the sites take these ads down IMMEDIATELY. They have NO reason to put themselves at risk for fraud as you'll notice that every fraudulent ad had been taken down as they come to my attention.

 

>The other part was when you stated that you never negotiate

>your rates and went into a long drawn out solioquy about how

>its degrading to do so and blah blah blah ad nauseum. Well,

>in the above mentioned ads, you stated that rates are

>negotiable. You yourself have offered to negotiate your rates

>if johns would take you to a show, etc etc. in this very

>message center.

 

Gee. These ADS aren't even PLACED by me so the point is moot. As to my offer to negotiate rates for a show, I have NEVER said that I wouldn't initiate negotiations in situations I saw fit. For example, a long weekend, a vacation, or in this case a show. When someone is shelling out extra (in some cases on my NY trip $500 for good seats from a ticket broker) I'm more than willing to come to a mutually fair fee. The idea that a client feels they have the right to tell someone what they're worth is the problem I was addressing on behalf of many.

 

DO NOT TURN THIS INTO ANOTHER ESCORT FEES THREAD HIJACKER. If you want to debate this, resurrect THAT thread if you have nothing better to do. This is about ME ME ME LOL.

 

>I am sure that was why you left here for a

>while because you had degraded yourself so thoroughly.

 

No, I left here because I was on vacation and didn't want to waste my month in one of the greatest cities on earth dealing with petty bullshit like yours. It wasn't WORTH my time. Now I'm in a lecture in summer session and god forbid I pay attention so I have time browse what latest drama Regina, Gretchen, and Karen have come up with.

 

>How on EARTH have you NOT been dishonest?

 

Still waiting for a REAL empirical answer to how I've been dishonest, not just your subjective interpretation.