Scott Adler

[SAdler]

My bad. Scrolled down to the latest post, now you should check post 74(I believe).

 

From what I'm reading you might as well remove your signature .... if you're capable of it that is

[Lankypeters]

> I'm not some

>political pac that people's altruism indirectly benefits them.

>

 

How's that again?

 

Lankypeters

[BewareofNick]

Scott, your denials are hardly plausible. You've been presented with the evidence. No amount of Fox "News" spin will change that.

 

So, getting back to the honesty part. You were 16 when you started escorting. Did you clients know they were committing a felony at the time?

 

You have also potentially put this site at risk. The following reviews were done of you when you were under the age of 18:

 

#1

 

Escort's Name: Scott Adler

Location: Los Angeles

Age: 18

Month & Year of Your Date: 03/2002

Where did you find him?:Men-For-Rent.com

 

Handle: Tahiti01

My Previously Published Reviews:

Bryan Young (San Antonio)

Brady Young (Las Vegas)

Patrick (Los Angeles)

Jason (Zurich)

Anthony (Paris)

 

So, a well published reviewer hired you at the tender age of 17.5 and notice where he found you: Men-For-Rent.com. HHHMMMMM.

 

Review #2, 4/6/2002

 

Escort's Name: Scott Adler

Location: LA

Age: 18

Month & Year of Your Date: March 2002

 

Handle: Zorro

 

Another who hired you at 17.

 

Review #3, 8/4/2002

 

Escort's Name: Scott Adler

Location: Southern California

Age: 18

when: 7/14/02

Where did you find him?:Men-For-Rent.com

 

Handle: Psychguyatrist

 

Yet another who found you on Men-For-Rent.com and another who hired you at 17.

 

Review #4, 8/15/2002

 

Escort's Name: Scott Adler

Location: Los Angeles

Age: 18

when: August 8, 2002

 

Handle: Redondo Ryan

My Previously Published Reviews:

Matt, London

Chad, London

 

Depending on your DOB, another 17 year old hiree.

 

Review #5, 8/25/2002

 

Escort's Name: Scott Adler

Location: Los Angeles

Age: 18

when: August 6, 2002

 

Handle: Magic Jim

 

And another.

 

So...how much more empirical would you like to get, Snotty?

[SAdler]

Certain people were telling people like Joel to stop advertising. I was saying that their posting about me was not benefiting them in any way, thus not "advertising."

 

If this were politics and I were some sort of PAC their donation (of advertising) would serve to benefit themselves.

[SAdler]

And again, I said, I didn't post those ads. I'm not saying I didn't BENEFIT from them but I said I didn't post them. Your next point might be?

 

I also wanted to add that you have WAAAAAY too much time on your hands Get a life.

[BewareofNick]

You also said you had them taken down as soon as you became aware of them. How would anyone have become aware of you being an escort if you had no reviews on this site, especially regarding your first reviewer? How would he have known you were an underage w*h*o*r*e unless you had some kind of advertisment out there???

 

I am not sure why you are continuing to lie and dig your hole further, but I am sure it will continue to be amusing.

[SAdler]

Digging Nothing, I'd be happy to explain. My ORIGINAL clients met me via referrals and word of mouth. Upon FINDING OUT about the ads I did not place I emailed the webmasters to take them down. Yes I mentioned they're taken down immediately, unfortunately that's not always the case when you deal with such big businesses like Men4Rent. Any other questions?

 

Any more self esteem issues you'd like to work through? Gayle Rubin and Susie Bright (fabulous authors, you should look into reading a book some time) discuss the concept of "othering." To make yourself feel better you call people that don't the have power to negatively affect your life anyway names. I'd love to see you call someone who could put you in jail those names, see if you do so well there. Of course, that would mean you'd have to leave your computer chair

 

It's sad and a little pathetic But I digress. Next jab?

[BewareofNick]

You're spinning out of control faster than Bill O'Reilly does when he's presented with a fact.

 

Did your clients know at the time that you were underage when they engaged in that felony with you?

 

Your first reviewer stated quite clearly he found you on Men-For-Rent.com. So did a subsequent reviewer. You obviously didn't move very fast to get the horrible ad taken down.

 

Did you even think about Hooboy when your reviews started coming in, knowing full well your clients were reviewing a 17 year old? What kind of legal situation does this put Daddy in now?

 

Scott, it's been very clearly established that you have engaged in dishonest behavior since you became an escort at the age of 16. It continues right to this very day.

 

You owe some folks here an apology.

 

But look on the bright side, when you graduate, you've already got the skills you need to get a job at Fox "News"!

[SAdler]

Here I've started stooping to your level...I don't need to justify myself to you or anybody else. As a human being you can take what I say or you can ignore it. Take your pick. I could care less.

 

What I say is all I have to speak about. You can theorize and make up whatever you like to make yourself look better, I'm not going to waste any more of my time telling you why you're wrong.

 

Class Dismissed (literally actually)

[BewareofNick]

Another evil doer down. Another point proven. next.

[SAdler]

Never said I was down, just said that I wouldn't debate why you're wrong anymore. And thank you for proving MY point by using a phrase like "evil-doer," really shows what type of brain trusts in this country you relate to

[BewareofNick]

Perhaps I should have prefaced that with "In my best Adam West voice" to make it easier for you to comprehend.

 

The reason you have given up is because you stand revealed as dishonest and hypocritical and you know it. You can't refute any of the evidence, so you resort to the Bill O'Reilly technique of disparaging your opponent and stating it doesn't really matter anyway.

 

I expected better of you.

[woodlawn]

> I do

>regret that I was young and stupid and took nudes

>(unphotoshopped no less) pictures and sent them to people

>blindly putting faith in people to be discreet.

 

I'm trying to figure out some way in which this explanation could make sense. So you did NOT authorize any escort ads at the time we are discussing, but you DID send nude photos of yourself to tricks who, for some reason, decided to establish you as an escort (contrary to your wishes) by using the photos and other information they had about you to create escort ads on your behalf? And then, entirely by coincidence, you decided to become an escort a few months later? Amazing!

 

>It's no shock for me to say that I've been escorting since I

>was 16 and a half.

 

It may not be a shock for you, but I bet it would come as a shock to your clients, who hired you unaware that they were making themselves liable to a substantial prison term and permanent sex offender status, as opposed to the small fine and embarrassment they thought was the worst that could happen to them for hiring a prostitute of legal age. I hope none of them who are now reading this thread have heart trouble.

 

> As to my offer to negotiate rates for a show, I have NEVER

>said that I wouldn't initiate negotiations in situations I saw

>fit. For example, a long weekend, a vacation, or in this case

>a show. When someone is shelling out extra (in some cases on

>my NY trip $500 for good seats from a ticket broker) I'm more

>than willing to come to a mutually fair fee. The idea that a

>client feels they have the right to tell someone what they're

>worth is the problem I was addressing on behalf of many.

 

Again, I am trying to figure this out. How do two people negotiate a price for services when one of them is forbidden to make an offer because he doesn't "have the right to tell someone what they're worth"? If anyone can explain this in a way that makes sense I would be most appreciative.

 

By the way, Scott, if you're contemplating a name change I understand that P. Diddy is giving up his old name and it is now available.

[citylaw1]

I thought reviews weren't allowed in the message center. Looks like Scott's getting preferential treatment. Maybe he'll pick up a fucking book now.

 

I miss Eric. Any info on him?

[citylaw1]

Digging Nothing, I'd be happy to explain. My ORIGINAL clients met me via referrals and word of mouth. Upon FINDING OUT about the ads I did not place I emailed the webmasters to take them down. Yes I mentioned they're taken down immediately, unfortunately that's not always the case when you deal with such big businesses like Men4Rent. Any other questions?

 

Any more self esteem issues you'd like to work through? Gayle Rubin and Susie Bright (fabulous authors, you should look into reading a book some time) discuss the concept of "othering." To make yourself feel better you call people that don't the have power to negatively affect your life anyway names. I'd love to see you call someone who could put you in jail those names, see if you do so well there. Of course, that would mean you'd have to leave your computer chair

 

It's sad and a little pathetic But I digress. Next jab?

 

We've learned a lot since these days.

[citylaw1]

> I do

>regret that I was young and stupid and took nudes

>(unphotoshopped no less) pictures and sent them to people

>blindly putting faith in people to be discreet.

 

I'm trying to figure out some way in which this explanation could make sense. So you did NOT authorize any escort ads at the time we are discussing, but you DID send nude photos of yourself to tricks who, for some reason, decided to establish you as an escort (contrary to your wishes) by using the photos and other information they had about you to create escort ads on your behalf? And then, entirely by coincidence, you decided to become an escort a few months later? Amazing!

 

>It's no shock for me to say that I've been escorting since I

>was 16 and a half.

 

It may not be a shock for you, but I bet it would come as a shock to your clients, who hired you unaware that they were making themselves liable to a substantial prison term and permanent sex offender status, as opposed to the small fine and embarrassment they thought was the worst that could happen to them for hiring a prostitute of legal age. I hope none of them who are now reading this thread have heart trouble.

 

> As to my offer to negotiate rates for a show, I have NEVER

>said that I wouldn't initiate negotiations in situations I saw

>fit. For example, a long weekend, a vacation, or in this case

>a show. When someone is shelling out extra (in some cases on

>my NY trip $500 for good seats from a ticket broker) I'm more

>than willing to come to a mutually fair fee. The idea that a

>client feels they have the right to tell someone what they're

>worth is the problem I was addressing on behalf of many.

 

Again, I am trying to figure this out. How do two people negotiate a price for services when one of them is forbidden to make an offer because he doesn't "have the right to tell someone what they're worth"? If anyone can explain this in a way that makes sense I would be most appreciative.

 

By the way, Scott, if you're contemplating a name change I understand that P. Diddy is giving up his old name and it is now available.

 

Does anyone else miss the writing of Woodlawn? I'm digging up old threads today.

[citylaw1]

Pls make believe I never boithered reading this "Long Advertisement"..LOL :+

 

JT in his younger days. King of the ""Quotations."" An esteemed member that has weathered many storms ... The Margaret Thatcher of our forum.