Scott Adler

[ErikMcAlister]

>When are we gonna get together for that overnight?

 

Hmmm... Can I think on it for a while? OK... how about NEVER?

[ErikMcAlister]

>Erik wrote:

>"There have been threads referencing me--some even relatively

>complimentary."

>

>I guess some johns like escorts who have the body of a sixty

>year old. Here's a concept for you: bench press.

 

Honey, please! It is more like that of an octogenarian!

[Guest Conway]

When I want other mean girls to reply to a conversation between myself and someone else, I'll let you know by titling it, "Mental patients-feel free to chime in".

 

Until then, mind your own business. I have my hands full enough with the two freakazoids I ciommunicate with ion this site now. I don't ne3ed you in the mix.

[BewareofNick]

>When I want other mean girls to reply to a conversation

>between myself and someone else, I'll let you know by titling

>it, "Mental patients-feel free to chime in".

>

>Until then, mind your own business. I have my hands full

>enough with the two freakazoids I ciommunicate with ion this

>site now. I don't ne3ed you in the mix.

 

I believe you've mistaken me for someone who gives a shit. The only mental patients I see are the ones who slavishly worship at the feet of prostitutes for no other reason other than that they are prostitutes.

 

You also need to refamiliarize yourself with the Church Ladies Credo as you are behaving in a decidely ungentlemanly manner. Please do so immediately and report back to me on your progress by Saturday.

[woodlawn]

>Once again, you're wrong. I wrote that I was going to hire

>Ben Nicholas. If I choose to share my experience with you, it

>will be via a review.

 

You mean there's a difference? I thought they were interchangeable, like Coke and Pepsi.

 

>BN, contrary to the nonsense started by the Xanax girls, is

>fabulous in the sack.

 

I'm surprised that you say so. I would have thought you'd actually have to have a dick in order to determine that.

[woodlawn]

>When I want other mean girls to reply to a conversation

>between myself and someone else, I'll let you know

 

You seem very confused. One example of that is your implication that it's up to you to decide who gets to participate in a conversation that involves me. BoN and my other colleagues from ES are more than welcome to chime in on any such conversation -- as if they needed an invitation.

 

>Until then, mind your own business. I have my hands full

>enough with the two freakazoids I ciommunicate with ion this

>site now. I don't ne3ed you in the mix.

 

Again, you're confused. There is no one here who cares what you need or don't need. The people you're addressing have been participating here since long before you showed up. There is no reason for any of us to feel we need your permission for anything.

[Guest Conway]

It's fine with me if you and Bi-polar Dougie stay out of my conversations. Honestly, it wouldn't matter to me if you took an overdose of your anti-psychotics and disappeared for good.

[Guest Conway]

Obviously, you give a shit because you and your cyberstalking buddy Woodlawn stalk every post I make on this board like a couple of maggots on an open wound. Though not a clinician, I'd dare say that you're becoming as obsessed with me as you are with that escort who seems to rule every minute of every day of your life.

 

Then again, your life has probably been one case after another of your obsessions driving your further down the road of no return from a perspective of your own personal sanity.

 

It seems a bit queer to me (in the traditional sense of the word)that one human (in the most liberal sense of the word) being could become so obssessed with another that he would devote himself to ruining that person the wau that you have to this Nick person (whoever he is).

 

Do people often utter the words "Get a life" to the two of you?

[Traveller]

>>BN, contrary to the nonsense started by the Xanax girls, is

>>fabulous in the sack.

>

>I'm surprised that you say so. I would have thought you'd

>actually have to have a dick in order to determine that.

>

 

Someone whom claims another person is "fabulous" in the sack doesn't have a dick. Trust me on this one.

 

Later.

[BewareofNick]

>Obviously, you give a shit because you and your cyberstalking

>buddy Woodlawn stalk every post I make on this board like a

>couple of maggots on an open wound. Though not a clinician,

>I'd dare say that you're becoming as obsessed with me as you

>are with that escort who seems to rule every minute of every

>day of your life.

 

I am sure you are sitting on your trailer right now masturbating to thought of anyone thinking about you with anything other than revulsion on theor mind.

 

>Then again, your life has probably been one case after another

>of your obsessions driving your further down the road of no

>return from a perspective of your own personal sanity.

 

You shouldn't make judgements on other lives based solely on your own.

[woodlawn]

>It's fine with me if you and Bi-polar Dougie stay out of my

>conversations. Honestly, it wouldn't matter to me if you took

>an overdose of your anti-psychotics and disappeared for good.

 

No matter how many times we repeat it, you still don't seem to get it: no one here cares what does or does not matter to you. When we make decisions, we never, ever ask ourselves, "How would Conway feel about this?" That's because we don't care about you. Got it now?

 

We have had more than our share of idiots here who are no more qualified to discuss mental illness than they are to pilot the Space Shuttle, but who constantly use buzzwords from the field of psychiatry to denigrate others -- but I have to admit you do it more often than any of the others.

[Guest Conway]

You see, Woody, the problem is this: If one goes on the board and notes the timing of your posts and "Travellers" posts last nigh, it only becomes all the more supportive of the fact that the person who uses those two handles interchangably has no socializtion outside of the internet.

 

That's the point I've been trying to make. Your opinion is as unimportant to those of us here as it is to the thousands you have crossed in life who have shunned you causing you to spend a Friday night using multiple handles to spill your venom across the one vehicle in life that you're still allowed to interact with humans- the internet.

 

That's a trait of bi-polar types, borderline personality types, schizo types, and general societal misfits with whom other people find direct interaction way too challenging to waste any time on.

 

Let's be honest, Taylor has an excuse. he spends his days sticking his arm up horses asses for a living. The internet seems cosmopolitan and exciting in comparison to his real life. Dougie has had to move to another country where no one can understand what he is saying because his interpersonal skills are so lacking. But, I think we all agree that he's more an effin' asshole than mentally ill.

 

But, you WoodyTraveller, you live in a big city where all kinds of humans interact with one another daily. Interaction creates opportunities for attraction and friendship with literally millions of people every year. What is it about you that causes others to reject you (other than your thoroughly miserable personality and your inability to accept that people like me, Ben and Scott (as well as others here) are simply beter people than trolls like you.

 

I know that it frustrates you to hear the sounds of the city below you at night, with its warm embracing human interaction taking place while you, waste yet another Friday night attack people you have no relationship with and institutions that you have no ownership of. It must make you hate those of us who are the "haves" in life even more.

[woodlawn]

>You see, Woody, the problem is this: If one goes on the

>board and notes the timing of your posts and "Travellers"

>posts last nigh, it only becomes all the more supportive of

>the fact that the person who uses those two handles

>interchangably has no socializtion outside of the internet.

 

You need to look up the word "socialization," not only to learn how to spell it but also to learn its definition. You're probably trying to say that I have no social life, but that isn't what "socialization" actually means.

 

>That's the point I've been trying to make. Your opinion is as

>unimportant to those of us here

 

You keep pretending that others on this board elected you to speak for them, when the fact is that nothing like that has ever happened. What, I wonder, could be the source of this delusion on your part? It's a real mystery.

 

If you ever figure out how to do a search of the archives, you will find more than one thread in which other members of this board have been good enough to say quite a few nice things about my posts over the years. Which means you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Nothing new there, of course.

 

> as it is to the thousands you

>have crossed in life who have shunned you

 

You and a few others who just can't seem to cope with the arguments I make here have often resorted in desperation to making up shit about my life outside this site, a subject of which you know and always will know absolutely nothing. The only thing you can accomplish by doing this is to make yourself look foolish. But that's not a problem for me.

 

 

>That's a trait of bi-polar types,

 

Again, you know absolutely nothing about psychiatry, but like the other amateur shrinks here you use buzzwords you've heard on television as insults directed at posters whose arguments are too tough for you to deal with. Do you really think people don't notice that?

 

>Let's be honest,

 

That is the one thing you've never tried in any of your posts here -- being honest. Being honest would require you to admit that you know absolutely nothing about the people you're insulting, and that everything you say about us here is just a bunch of shit that you make up to cover your inability to face us on our own terms.

 

Being honest would also require you to admit that in addition to being an inveterate liar you are also a hypocrite. You complain endlessly about the nastiness of other posters, while behaving in exactly the same way as those you complain about. No one can take your complaints seriously, since you refuse to uphold in your own actions the standards of behavior you find lacking in others. You're as ludicrous as Bobby Knight giving a lecture on sportsmanship would be, if he were foolish enough to pontificate about a trait he so conspicuously lacks. He isn't, but unfortunately you are.

[Guest Conway]

Less than three hours to reply. You're less "socialized" than even I thought. You should buy one of these hookers you spend all day bitching about. You might be a bit less cranky if you left that computer chair and got boned from time to time.

 

As for who I speak for, I speak for only me. And, given your little hissyfit above, it appears I have spoken the truth as to what a friendless social toad you are.

 

What you are, Woody/Traveller, is an example of what a desperate miserable wretch a person can become when his mental problems alienate him from the rest of the world. The only people available for you to talk to are the voices in your head.

 

I'm getting ready to go out to dinner with friends. Have fun stewing in front of your computer all night on a Saturday night. Loser.

[BewareofNick]

>As for who I speak for, I speak for only me. And, given your

>little hissyfit above, it appears I have spoken the truth as

>to what a friendless social toad you are.

>

>What you are, Woody/Traveller, is an example of what a

>desperate miserable wretch a person can become when his mental

>problems alienate him from the rest of the world. The only

>people available for you to talk to are the voices in your

>head.

>

>I'm getting ready to go out to dinner with friends. Have fun

>stewing in front of your computer all night on a Saturday

>night. Loser.

 

It's fascinating how you continue to assume that others share your mental illness and lack of social skills. As for dinner with your "friends" tonight, are these paid companions, imaginary friends or stuffed animals? I can just see you sitting at Denny's with everyone staring at you as you place your fluff filled "friends" around the table.

[woodlawn]

>>As for who I speak for, I speak for only me.

 

Then why do you keep referring to others in your posts? When you say "no one" thinks this or that, is your understanding of English really so bad that you don't know that locution has a different meaning than saying "I" think this or that? I keep hearing media reports of how badly our public schools do at educating people these days, but it is only when I encounter people whose English is as poor as yours that the message really hits home.

 

>And, given

>your

>>little hissyfit above, it appears I have spoken the truth as

>>to what a friendless social toad you are.

 

Nothing that you have said on this board about any subject is the truth. Your only contribution here is to make shit up to insult other posters. And you do that because you don't have the intellectual ability to counter the arguments we make. Everyone who reads your posts knows this. You simply have to stop deceiving yourself about it.

 

>>I'm getting ready to go out to dinner with friends. Have fun

>>stewing in front of your computer all night on a Saturday

>>night. Loser.

 

This is the second or third time you've used that tired old device to weasel out of an argument on this message board. It is really embarrassing to watch you tell transparent lies that no veteran reader of this board is going to believe for one moment; what's most embarrassing about it is that you really think anyone is going to believe them.

 

The truth is, you shouldn't be posting here at all. You lack the intelligence and the experience to hold your own among people who have been doing it for years, as the regulars here have.

[VaHawk]

As the trite old saying goes "kettle meet pot!".

[woodlawn]

>As the trite old saying goes "kettle meet pot!".

 

Trite old sayings are for trite old people. As for me, I don't think you can find any post of mine in which I call upon imaginary friends as an excuse to run away from an argument or any post in which I pretend to know the details of the life of someone about whom I actually know nothing. You can find posts like that under Conway's name, under Rick's name, under deej's name, and under the names of one or two others, but not under mine.

[Guest Conway]

You seem to be providing shitloads of support for my position that you're an obsessive compulsive with borderline personality disorder.

 

That's what "we" think.

[woodlawn]

>You seem to be providing shitloads of support for my position

>that you're an obsessive compulsive with borderline

>personality disorder.

>

>That's what "we" think.

 

The next time I run into someone who is actually trained in psychiatry, I'll ask him what it signifies about an individual's mental health when he constantly pretends that he speaks for many other people even though it couldn't be more obvious that he doesn't. And what it signifies when he constantly pretends that he knows something about a subject -- in this case, psychiatry -- when it's just as obvious that he's totally ignorant of it.

[Lankypeters]

Am I the only one who's tiring of this catfight? Even Steven Draker, during his recent US tour, didn't bring out the claws this way. I don't know about Scott, but Steven didn't deserve it.

 

Lankypeters

[BewareofNick]

Woody, when Conway says "we", he's referring to his multiple personalities and/or his stuffed animals.

[ErikMcAlister]

Oh, don't get me started on that whiney mess!

[Guest Conway]

Oh, Nicky. Just because you have them doesn'ty mean we're all fortunate enough to have them.

 

Ypu'd better run. I'd hate for you to miss another hour of stalking a retired hoker because of me.

[Epigonos]

Lankypeters this thread got hijacked and ceased having anything to do with Scott Adler a long time ago.