MC posters vs. review posters

[PacNW]

Having only been hiring escorts for a few months, I've held off on posting reviews until I felt like I had some basis for comparison and praise/criticisms. However, I'm figuring it's about time to start up.

 

I don't read every review, so this is a very unscientific impression only, but it doesn't seem like a lot of MC posters post reviews, and vice versa. Is it that people post under different handles? Or is it just that, as deej pointed out elsewhere, there is a vast difference in traffic volume between the reviews section and the MC so the MC posters are naturally an equally small percentage of the review posters?

[+ deej]

All of the above. ;-)

 

Some MC posters use a different handle when posting reviews. They might consider "switching" their reviewer handle but then they'd lose the history and start over as a "first time poster". Some, for whatever reason, like the separation.

 

The reviews have always accounted for the lion's share of this site's traffic, most of that from readers. In many online forums/communities the ratio of "lurker" to "participant" has been estimated as high as 50 to 1. Some people just like to watch. :9

[+ Charlie]

Although there are lots of people listed as members of the MC, those who actually participate on the board are a relatively small group, and within that group an even smaller number dominate the posts. Most of them do not hire frequently (with obvious exceptions like Totally Oz, marc anthony, and okliehomo), and they may hire the same guys repeatedly, so they don't submit numerous reviews. Many people who do use this site are not interested in discussion with other clients, so they don't visit the MC often, or they don't even realize it is here (I was an enthusiastic reviewer for months before I discovered the MC). There are also some people who use different handles for their reviews and their MC posts (I am not one of them), because they feel freer to take part in discussions with a separate identity from their reviewer identity.

 

If someone would volunteer to pay me for research, I would gladly hire and review many more escorts.

[Rick Munroe]

>Some people just like to

>watch. :9

 

And luckily, some of us thrive under a watchful eye. }(

[Guest Mikel]

and then, some "pseudo reviews" in the form of candid comments in response to 411's do get posted in the MC These should not be dismissed

[Juan Vancouver]

Being an escort, I think that I would be great for that kind of research too.

If you find a sponsor, tell him that I am willing to hire escorts on his name to check their quality, profesionalism, hotness and so on...

 

I am shuddering with disgust at the thought of having to have sex with hot young talented kids for work... x( But I guess a man has to do what a man has to do!

 

[noviceny]

I have a number of reviews but made the mistake of forgetting the names under which I reviewed. I reviewed under "Noviceny" "social worker" and "jim" Then HoobOY sent me an email that said that is not the way we are supposed to do it ...ooops

[JT Brooklyn]

IMHO. Charlie has definitely hit the Nail on the Head..Especially where keeping "Separate" the Review Name and the Forum Name is concerned... Any references made in the Forums will not be linked up to Escorts Reviewed. Which might not be the intention and Sour an otherwise Great Sexy and Friendly Relationship! :+ :+ :+

[PacNW]

>If someone would volunteer to pay me for research, I would

>gladly hire and review many more escorts.

 

As a "professional" escort reviewer, think about all the business expenses you'd get to write off on your taxes!