Tony#2 Hooboy's Coverboy for 03/27/02

[+ Axiom2001]

What a hot picture!! The review I liked reading, but when I read that he allowed the client to shoot into his ass without the use of a condom--that disturbed me. I know he is FREE to do what he wants to do, but it disturbed me. What's your take clients and escorts?

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>What a hot picture!! The review I liked reading, but when I

>read that he allowed the client to shoot into his ass

>without the use of a condom--that disturbed me. I know he is

>FREE to do what he wants to do, but it disturbed me. What's

>your take clients and escorts?

 

Well - the first thought that came to mind is that he is probably poz and for that reason feels no more harm can be done.

 

Or....... maybe he has a death wish.

 

Thunderbuns

[+ deej]

It's a sad but true reality that unsafe sex is going on.

 

Our own Will wrote a fabulous essay about it. You can read it here:

 

http://www.cockring.org/columns/showguest.cfm?Show=18

 

I personally don't approve of and won't have unprotected sex. There was a negative review posted in the last day or so and one of the client's biggest gripes was that the escort didn't have any condoms. Honey, if you're expecting to have safe sex you'd better make sure there are condoms in your pocket and remember to use them!

[Guest JON1265]

>What's your take clients and escorts?

 

Well, speaking as a client they are both grown men and able to make their own decisions...I make no judgements.

 

The escort looks like a porno star but I can't recall his name ...I can remember seeing him on the cover of the box...does he look familiar to anyone else?

[Damascene]

The photo is of Steve Cannon of Fallen Angel 1.

[+ deej]

"Steve Cannon" is an interesting story. He was a successful and very popular weatherman on a local TV station who ditched his career to do porn. When he retired from porn, he returned to Chicago and bought a gay bar. I believe it's still doing business.

[Guest JON1265]

>"Steve Cannon" is an interesting story. He was a successful

>and very popular weatherman on a local TV station who

>ditched his career to do porn. When he retired from porn, he

>returned to Chicago and bought a gay bar. I believe it's

>still doing business.

 

Steve Marks was also a weatherman in the Windy City....was is it with weathermen in Chi-town going to do porn? Kinda funny...

[+ Axiom2001]

Men, thanks for responding! Did I read his review as I thought I read it which evoked this thread? I ask for I emailed Tony#2 and he inquired about this site; in his last email to me he was defensive.

I handled the latter all right. Again, does the review read as if a condom had not been used? Clarify for me, for I do not want to write allegations that are not so.

[Traveller]

I may be going out on a limb here, but the parenthetical in the review, "(yes he took my load home in his ass, a big turn on for me!)," kinda sounds like bareback to me.

 

Later.

 

PS. He is still one extremely hot dude; and stupid.

[+ deej]

>Steve Marks was also a weatherman in the Windy City....was

>is it with weathermen in Chi-town going to do porn? Kinda

>funny...

 

OOPS! You're right. I had my Steves mixed up. Sorry everyone!

[Guest JON1265]

>Again, does the review read as if a condom had not been used? >Clarify for me, for I do not want to write allegations that are not >so.

 

 

Yes, you read the review right....and if you check his other reviews...he also mentions in those reviews of his fucking without a condom and dropping loadsa in various asses...I don't know why this one is particularly review is upsetting to you...these are big boys - they can make their own choices....

[+ Lucky]

My guess is that it is upsetting to him because like so many people throughout history, he has his own idea of how people should behave and will not be satisfied until he forces it unto everybody else. Just like those Catholic priests who preach the "truth" about sexuality.

When big brother comes, he will have no trouble finding "gay" guys to do his work for him.

[Guest sdmuscl4hire]

We need to post the NAME and city where this client is to warn the escorts out there

 

Michael

[+ Axiom2001]

>>Again, does the review read as if a condom had not been used? >Clarify for me, for I do not want to write allegations that are not >so.

>

>

>Yes, you read the review right....and if you check his other

>reviews...he also mentions in those reviews of his fucking

>without a condom and dropping loadsa in various asses...I

>don't know why this one is particularly review is upsetting

>to you...these are big boys - they can make their own

>choices....

 

I'm quite aware that these two guys are consenting ADULTS! I guess I am having a hard time thinking about sexually-active individuals NOT being responsible.

 

When I bought a popular SF escort's video which showed him in a circle conjesting the cum of about six other performers, I got on my ole computer and wrote the nicest email to him. He responded candidly but not scorchingly or bitchingly. I just know that he and I will perhaps not be getting together; the same thing happened to another escort and writer on this site. When I purchased three of his videos and saw him eating cum-- I wrote; he responded, but we wont ever be hooking up.

 

In the era of a deadly, incurable disease--my philosophy is be EDUCATED! Be RESPONSIBLE! Use SAFER sexual practices. Be HONEST!

 

I've been with a popular SF escort who said he's HIV negative and would like for me to let him cum into my mouth when he put that 9 incher down my throat; I refused. He respected my decision. He and I have yet to discuss this important issue in any depth!

 

As an aside-- I have never asked an escort about his status, but all have used condoms if I'd wanted to be fucked. They have not asked me either; I did tell the heavily hung top that I too am negative, but will not exchange fluids that are known to infect if one is carrying the virus.

[+ Axiom2001]

>My guess is that it is upsetting to him because like so many

>people throughout history, he has his own idea of how people

>should behave and will not be satisfied until he forces it

>unto everybody else. Just like those Catholic priests who

>preach the "truth" about sexuality.

>When big brother comes, he will have no trouble finding

>"gay" guys to do his work for him.

 

As you know you're entitled to your opinion: I definitely do NOT accept it because I write not being judgmental just CONCERNED about the health of people and people being responsible for maintaining the health of himself as well as others. Read my other remarks below!!!

[+ Axiom2001]

>We need to post the NAME and city where this client is to

>warn the escorts out there

>

>Michael

 

 

I totally agree! I'd state to the escorts NOT to have client fuck them unless client is wearing a condom. ...unless client is practicing SAFER sexual practices during the act of intercourse, etc.

[Guest JON1265]

>I'm quite aware that these two guys are consenting ADULTS! I

>guess I am having a hard time thinking about sexually-active

>individuals NOT being responsible.

 

It has been happening for decades - if not centuries...look at how many unwanted pregnancies we have had over the years...

 

 

>

>When I bought a popular SF escort's video which showed him

>in a circle conjesting the cum of about six other

>performers, I got on my ole computer and wrote the nicest

>email to him. He responded candidly but not scorchingly or

>bitchingly.

 

Why would or should he respond "scorchingly or bitchingly" if you just wrote him a nice e-mail? Were you passing judgemnt - but in a nice way?

 

 

>In the era of a deadly, incurable disease--my philosophy is

>be EDUCATED! Be RESPONSIBLE!

 

That is your philosophy - and a noble one - but, sadly, it is not everyone's. I feel the same way about smokers.

 

 

 

>

>I've been with a popular SF escort who said he's HIV

>negative and would like for me to let him cum into my mouth

>when he put that 9 incher down my throat; I refused. He

>respected my decision. He and I have yet to discuss this

>important issue in any depth!

 

Just curious - did you suck him off with a condom? There is some HIV virus found in pre-cum ya know.

 

 

>

>As an aside-- I have never asked an escort about his status,

>but all have used condoms if I'd wanted to be fucked. They

>have not asked me either;

 

And yet you want to start a "folder" listing people?? Should escorts start a folder listing clients as well?

 

I did tell the heavily hung top

>that I too am negative, but will not exchange fluids that

>are known to infect if one is carrying the virus.

 

And why should he believe you? Actually he shouldn't- nor should you believe anyone who claims they are negative. Just treat everyone as POZ and play safe.

[Guest Blink]

A while ago...there was review of Chance Caldwell being gang fucked by a group of guys...bareback.

 

I never been with Chance and I won't have sex with him.

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

I'd like to make a little observation about some of the caterwaulling here.

 

I suspect there's a little hypocrisy here and not the kind you think I mean.

 

We all know barebacking is dangerous - duh. And we all agree that we're adults and can whatever we damn well please.

 

I suspect that many of the people who are typing away about "how can people do something that will kill them?!?" are sitting there with a cigarette hanging out of their mouths and their bellies touching their knees.

 

I always get annoyed by fat smokers who lecture others on their health choices. When you stop chomping on that double-stuff pizza, could you do us all a favor and shut up?

 

If you're 55 years old and negative, more than likely if you contracted HIV tomorrow, you're gonna be dead from being FAT before AIDS can get you. So, if you're planning on staying big as a house for the rest of your (short) life, calm down. More than likely you're gonna fall over dead while reaching for chocolat ice cream in the frozen food section of the A&P.

 

Cheerily yours,

 

FFF

[+ Lucky]

RE: Hooboy's Coverboy for 03/27/02

 

Hopefully, everyone posting is physically fit and does not smoke or do drugs. Also, I am sure that none of these guys who are so ready to tattoo the poz guys are closet cases. Wouldn't it be ironic that someone who can't come to terms with his own sexuality would be willing to take charge of others sexuality?

[Traveller]

RE: Hooboy's Coverboy for 03/27/02

 

>Hopefully, everyone posting is physically fit and does not

>smoke or do drugs.

 

But Lucky, I'm certain that you know that a bump after a chip washed down with Cuervo creates a combo that negates all of the unhealthy elements in each. 2 or 3 recreationals mixed with booze is the road to a long, sane and athletic life. That's how I climb volcanos, helicopter ski and fuck all week long.

 

Later.

 

PS. Live by the 3 Bs: Booze, Bumps and Beepers. No Will, not Bach, Beethoven and Brahms.

[Guest Tomcal_]

>I'd like to make a little observation about some of the

>caterwaulling here.

>

>I suspect there's a little hypocrisy here and not the kind

>you think I mean.

>

>We all know barebacking is dangerous - duh. And we all agree

>that we're adults and can whatever we damn well please.

>

>I suspect that many of the people who are typing away about

>"how can people do something that will kill them?!?" are

>sitting there with a cigarette hanging out of their mouths

>and their bellies touching their knees.

>

>I always get annoyed by fat smokers who lecture others on

>their health choices. When you stop chomping on that

>double-stuff pizza, could you do us all a favor and shut up?

>

>If you're 55 years old and negative, more than likely if you

>contracted HIV tomorrow, you're gonna be dead from being FAT

>before AIDS can get you. So, if you're planning on staying

>big as a house for the rest of your (short) life, calm down.

>More than likely you're gonna fall over dead while reaching

>for chocolat ice cream in the frozen food section of the

>A&P.

>

>Cheerily yours,

>

>FFF

My compliments on what i think is the best written post in this thread

[guyinsf]

Wasn't that review revealed to be bogus?

[Traveller]

Thank the Baby Jesus (it is Good Friday, isn't it) that Hoo didn't select Robert from Grand Rapids as today's coverboy. It might've sparked a stroke trying to decide whether to vote for Tony #2 or Robert for this month's coverboy. Small favors, that's all I say.

 

Later.

 

PS. On the other hand, regarding another of today's, by the time I get to Phoenix, he'd better still be working.

[Guest DickHo]

>PS. On the other hand, regarding another of today's, by the

>time I get to Phoenix, he'd better still be working.

 

AMEN!