JayElec Posted August 10 Posted August 10 Anyone have any info? Only one review and no past mentions in the forums. Pics look vaguely familiar https://rentmasseur.com/elitemasseur Harryinny 1
JayElec Posted August 14 Author Posted August 14 Apparently, $250 for therapeutic and $300 for sensual. No face pics and 1 review, will most likely pass. BigDMike 1
ManLuver Posted Monday at 03:19 AM Posted Monday at 03:19 AM (edited) I just had what's one of the worst massages I've ever had. https://rentmasseur.com/elitemasseur Let me detail what made it one of the worst: The photos did not match what he looks like. Not even close. He's got a gut. He doesn't have one in the photos -- not by a long shot. I am not even sure the photos are of him. The "sensual" massage, which cost $50 more, was anything but sensual. He never took off his shorts, there was no happy ending or similar activity, etc. He said "sensual" means he provides a softer touch during the latter part of the massage. Give. Me. A. Break. The massage itself paled in comparison to many other massages I've gotten. And it was definitely not worth $300. Verdict: He's a nice guy and has a decent body, but his services are nowhere near worth paying $300. Advice: Don't hire him. Just don't. Edited Monday at 03:22 AM by ManLuver Added boldface and underlining. pubic_assistance, BigDMike and BeefyDude 2 1
+ azdr0710 Posted Monday at 04:01 AM Posted Monday at 04:01 AM in his defense (not that I'm defending him), the forum has been trying to define "sensual massage" since Hooboy days (earliest days of this century)........still trying....... thanks for the comments on him......this will probably be moved to the "Spa" subforum at some point soon...... I wish it had been a better experience for you ManLuver and MikeBiDude 2
Typical Posted Monday at 05:44 AM Posted Monday at 05:44 AM He’s a “nice guy”? No he’s not! A nice guy doesn’t charge you $50 extra for a softer massage. He’s a dick and a con. That’s not nice at all. But, I will say, hiring a headless wonder is a mistake. Don’t do that. No headless wonders and no deposits. And most certainly no deposits to headless wonders. As far as “sensual” meaning, with the extra fee often associated, there is no doubt that means at least happy ending. None. Zero. Zip. No debate. No second guessing. No confusion on the matter whatsoever. None. I’m surprised there is any controversy about that at all here or anywhere else. There shouldn’t be. In NYC there is no doubt about that at all. I certainly have not heard of this particular debate in 20 years. Sensual means at least HE. Always has. jeffla, ManLuver, pubic_assistance and 1 other 2 1 1
GossipSummary Posted Monday at 05:52 AM Posted Monday at 05:52 AM I hope there is a way for you to get your money back. ManLuver 1
starman05 Posted Monday at 06:14 AM Posted Monday at 06:14 AM 300 is a lot. I've had great massages with guys who have great bodies. The body doesn't have to be great but the massage needs to be. pubic_assistance and ManLuver 1 1
jeffla Posted Monday at 06:28 AM Posted Monday at 06:28 AM "sensual" may have debatable definitions, but not when it's accompanied by a $50 surcharge. You're not paying $50 extra for a softer touch. That's ridiculous. For the massage part, usually you pay more for DEEPER work if it's strictly therapeutic. pubic_assistance, ManLuver and BigDMike 2 1
BuzzLiteQueer Posted Monday at 06:39 AM Posted Monday at 06:39 AM 3 hours ago, ManLuver said: The photos did not match what he looks like. Not even close. He's got a gut. He doesn't have one in the photos -- not by a long shot. I am not even sure the photos are of him. Another reason not to trust ads full of headless wonder shots of hot bods. When in doubt, as for Facetime, or whatever medium you can use to confirm the photos = who you will meet. ManLuver and pubic_assistance 2
Mark_fl Posted Monday at 11:00 AM Posted Monday at 11:00 AM Sorry, need to add this. There is NO reason to post a headless ad if there is no sexual aspect to the massage. None. And a legitimate massage should run you about $100, not 2 or 3. Scam city from start to non-finish. Not a nice guy. ManLuver and BuzzLiteQueer 1 1
ManLuver Posted Tuesday at 02:13 AM Posted Tuesday at 02:13 AM Thanks to everyone for their feedback. My regular guy was out of town over the weekend. So I decided to take a chance on this guy, even though he didn’t have face pics. Next time I will be more cautious. + azdr0710 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now