Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 3/19/2026 at 10:26 AM, dutchal said:

Amounts reported in the RMasseur reviews are eye-popping:  $1000 for 180; $500-$800 for 120; $600 for 990; $300-$500 for 60; $450 for 20.  How much massage can happen in 20 minutes?!

Hello, Gabriel here.

All sessions are delivered in full — I never rush or cut time.

 

The “20 minutes” shown in that review is simply a platform entry error. That guest actually booked two 90-minute sessions across consecutive days — you’re welcome to read his full review for context.

 

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out — always happy to help.

IMG_1463.jpeg

IMG_1462.jpeg

Posted

Holy smokes, what a 10/10!

I'll be in NYC next month when he's in LA though, what a bummer. Still bookmarked him for the future. :D

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/16/2026 at 5:37 PM, riser said:

I can’t stop seeing AI photoshop

Not AI—just consistency and attention to detail 🙂
I understand the skepticism though. Discretion and authenticity matter a lot in this space.

Posted
On 4/17/2026 at 7:42 PM, GabrielToper said:

Not AI—just consistency and attention to detail 🙂
I understand the skepticism though. Discretion and authenticity matter a lot in this space.

Well I certainly appreciate your attention to detail and hope to experience it in person one day

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Not to belabor the point but has anyone from the COM community actually met and hired Gabriel ? It’s kind of baffling that no one here has reviewed him yet. 

Posted

How can anyone tell anything about those photos when they are so small? I don't like rentmen for that reason. Their user-interface is so 1990's.

Posted

Hey it's Gabriel here

I appreciate your honesty, though I’m sorry to hear they gave that impression. Those photos were actually taken with a Sony Alpha a7R, with Godox strobe lighting. The high resolution (61MP) captures a level of detail that people often mistake for AI-generated textures and they are professional photos, as I'm a model too.

I used a shallow depth of field (f/1.8 equivalent) to achieve that background blur, which is why the focus looks so sharp.

We used a high shutter speed with natural sidelighting to get that crisp look, which can sometimes look almost 'too perfect' in certain digital formats. I take pride in a high-polish finish, but I understand how that can trigger scepticism lately.

Thanks! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...