2001 Top Ten Worst Escorts

[Godiva]

I shamelessly stole the idea from the other post but in reverse. We see the same names pop up over and over again and many of us clients are embarrased to write a review so who are they and most importantly .......Why...This could help us all avoid these terrors

and save some money.

 

For me it was Victor..not the one on this site..He stole my money off the table and ran out of my house..After repeated calls to his cell phone 1 week later.. he apologized and said he would make it up. I said No Way..my loss. I will do a review this week on him..

 

Godiva

[Guest Sports]

Is that Victor #2, the Brazilian who dances at the Gaiety and Splash?

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Godiva,

 

IMHO, the reviews or a full post on the board are the appropriate place for this material . To list a name or names without enough identification to know who one is talking about, or without going into the details of the incident does a disservice to both the escort and the readers who are, or might have been, potential clients. Otherwise, it seems little different form a smear campaign full of innuendo and little in the way of fact. I know this was not your intention, just giving my view on how it looks.

[Guest Kevin 2]

A review is always best. Because its easy to find, however this thread will be buried in no time. Having said that if you had a bad experience and won't submit a review by all means let us know the bad guys!

[Godiva]

Kevin no he is not the same..He has'nt been reviewed yet which is what made me think of this...Tampa your right that was not my intention..saying that.. this post could be used as another reference guide in conjunction with the reviews in general. It is up to the individual to use all this info to make the final decision. It should be treated the same as the comment section of the review and we should abide by the same rules of conduct. My goal was to simplify it so anyone can look here see a name.. than go back and check the escorts review..Some of these notorious escorts that some of us long posters are aware of continue to prosper because A) they havn't been reviewed..B)the cliente didn't get enough info to make an informed decision.

I admire what BewareofNick has done..he has saved alot of people from getting humiliated and ripped off. Trust me Tampa the escorts who belong in this section (that we all know Kirk and Darren or whoever) don't care what we think here and many clients posted that in their reviews. If someone thends to exaggerate a wee bit here my guess here is it can't be that far from the truth.

 

When I looked at the 10 Best...I looked at the list..Read some of the comments..and some of those may not be true..but for argument sake lets say they are:-) I went back and got a few names off the list that I haven't sampled yet. I will partake in their offerings in the comming weeks. I also want to know who consistently here scamms us fellow patrons. I don't have the time to click on every single escorts name and read all the reviews.

 

I hope I made sense Tampa..we can agree to disagree.

 

I am glad you posted..Your point is well taken

Got to go to work..

 

 

Godiva

[Guest cmp]

The name of the list should be "The Bottom Ten Escorts" - the opposite of the "Top Ten"

[adriano46]

Guys,

 

For whatever it is worth, if one supposes you have to have some experience with an escort before rating him, would it not reflect badly on a CLIENT if he even has 10 "worsts" in his little black book?

 

I have been with a number of escorts, but can count as "bad" experiences only three, and in one way or another the appropriate review was posted.

 

I also agree that such rating of "worst escorts" could turn very vicious, personal, vindictive and crude, and best not paraded in this way. The current reviews are more than sufficient, and at least there the escort has a chance at rebuttal.

[Traveller]

This is much more fun.

 

1. Estephen - LA (boysusa.com)

2. Dillon - NYC (rentboy.com)

3. Jason #3 - London (aussiehorsecock@hotmail.com)

 

I'll keep posting as blood returns to my brain.

 

Later.

[+ Lucky]

RE: 2001 Ten Worst Escorts

 

"I'll keep posting as blood returns to my brain." Traveller, I can't wait that long! You know how slowly that can happen....

[Traveller]

RE: 2001 Ten Worst Escorts

 

>"I'll keep posting as blood returns to my brain." Traveller,

>I can't wait that long! You know how slowly that can

>happen....

 

Actually I was trying to throw you off track. As one of the living dead, I haven't had blood in my veins for years.

 

Later.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

>This is much more fun.

>

>1. Estephen - LA (boysusa.com)

 

Isn't he a little short for your taste???

 

NIce looking guy but needs an attitude overhaul -- which is not all that bad if he's trying to set the Guiness record for most clients in one night... I just had the feeling I was the only one on the dance card and he had to get back to the Lucy and Ricky Show.

 

I wouldn't put him in the Worst Ten though -- no way -- now ADD therapy... that's another thing altogether.

 

:-)

 

P.S. It should be boyZusa.com

[Traveller]

>>1. Estephen - LA (boysusa.com)

>

 

He had a big dick, a great bod and I was in the mood for salsa. Fairly perfunctory, however.

 

Later.

[Godiva]

Adriano..I am sure if someone decided to be vicious or slander anyone here the moderators would step in. Which is what they do in the review section...

 

There is never too much information when making an informed decision with mula involved..

 

 

Godiva

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Yes,it was definitely the same guy. What a pity... he has all the natural resources to be a great one but his heart just isn't in it.

:-(

[Godiva]

Should JT from Gaiety be included on this list to stay away from???

 

Godiva

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Godiva,

 

>I hope I made sense Tampa..we can agree to disagree.

 

Yes we can, and I do appreciate your intent...

 

> My goal was to simplify it so anyone

>can look here see a name.. than go back and check the

>escorts review.

 

I have no problem with an 'index' for negative reviews but I think this effort is likely to fall way short of that mark and include a lot of content not found in the reviews which is unverified or not subbject to a response.

 

>...Trust me

>Tampa the escorts who belong in this section (that we all

>know Kirk and Darren or whoever) don't care what we think

>here and many clients posted that in their reviews.

 

You are not my concern but I see this, at worst, as a vehicle to make mischief for escorts by people with scores to settle or with an unhealthy preoccupation with an escort. We have seen these types here before. At best, we may have honest, well meaning guys providing a negative without any description of the basis for judgment possibly leading to a blacklistings for unknown reason.

 

>If

>someone thends to exaggerate a wee bit here my guess here is

>it can't be that far from the truth.

>

Sorry, we disagree here. I've seen too much on these boards to give that much blanket latitude to 'benefit of the doubt'.

 

I

>I also want

>to know who consistently here scamms us fellow patrons.

 

As do I.

 

 

>I don't have the time to click on every single escorts name

>and read all the reviews.

>'

Nor do I.

 

Godiva, I do not have a problem with a post discussing the negative aspects of an escort... I favor informing the community -- see my exchange with traveller below. But the post should provide content as to the nature of the dissatisfaction (yours above did although I had no idea who you were referring to). My concern is the post that lists one, 3 or 5 names without any discussion of the offense and moreover, the fact that this is a one-way judgment of a two way interaction i.e. no escort response since he won't know about the listing if he doesn't hang at this site on a regular basis -- and most do not, I think. The response is less of an issue if there are two or more clients discussing a negative experience. I'm just uneasy having only one side of the story for establishing a Worst Ten List.

 

As for your comment to Adriano that the moderators would pull vicious posts... read the rules, which are very clear. Only personal information revelations and libelous statements are subject to getting pulled. This board abounds with vicious statement lately.

 

So we agree to disagree, but the disagreement is narrow it seems.

[adriano46]

Godiva,

 

I wish it were the truth, but unfortunately one does not have to go too far back to see where such actions occur - and frequently.

 

I agree the more information the better, but that is what the reviews are for (and the "no-shows" board), and I would prefer making an assessment on an escorts postives and minuses from someone who actually has had experience with him.

 

Unfortunately too some escorts use these postings to self-promote, or worse to destroy others (usually behind other names), and I unfortunately suspect that some of the moderators knowingly allow this. I hope I am wrong, but again, some of the recent threads make me wonder whether all of the moderators are totally objective, or rather (sub)consciously promoting their favourites and letting the hounds loose at any others not on their "favourite" list.

 

I guess I am tired of some of the vitriol which has become so common recently and would hope to stop such on yet another thread.

[BewareofNick]

Gosh, I just can't think of anyone to nominate....

[Guest DickHo]

1. Tyke - NYC (rentboy.com)

2. Jason #3 - London (aussiehorsecock@hotmail.com)

3. Top Tier Stud - NYC (rentboy.com and everywhere else it seems!)

[Godiva]

As I had hope..while we are being respectful which is way more than some of these con artist deserve..One starts to see similar names appear on different list. Guess who I won't be a callin}>

 

 

 

[h1]G[h1/]

[Godiva]

Oh C'mon BewareofNick....really;-)

 

 

Godiva

[Guest dcdave]

In Las Vegas, without a doubt - Hunter/Shane and Nick to the list of the worst.

 

Dave