Actions Speak Louder Than Words (Good Riddens to The Gaiety)

[ready4boi]

RE: Aha!

 

CZ,

 

It is baffling as to why you persist in your crusade to preserve The Gaiety as it is now. Maybe you are a good friend of Denise's or someone who works at the place. You have been the most vocal but give very weak support to your arguments. I think in light of what's been going on there and how it's changed The Gaiety had its time which came and went. Now it's become a parody of it's former self especially with the wave of conniving straight boys posturing like Kirk, JT, and Colt. There are newer places like Cupid's in Florida and Swinging Richards's in Atlanta I'd much rather go to and watch hot nude men, but for my escorting needs I have found The Gaiety to have reached a level of extremely low customer satisfaction. It has completely lost its magic. The last time I was there felt like a wake...a funeral for a place that's time has truly passed. I liked the Jurassic comment. Denise and that place have become relics, the last remaining artifacts of an era gone by when Times Square had way more to offer. I'm sure she realizes it is now much more like a poor imitation of the other places I've mentioned above. Since this is all we can expect to have left in New York, I won't shed a tear like you and New York Observer to see it go.

[Guest Bitchboy]

RE: Aha!

 

What a repulsive little gnome this ready4boi seems to be. First, you will win no points with criticism of NYObserver. Actually, he seems to be the target of your pompous little observations (as misspelled as they are). Using Kirk and JT to jump on a person people actually like seems creepy. Also, seems to me that the Gaiety will do much better without a sneering little sniper like you in the audience. Why in the hell would someone as negative as you have spent such a good portion of your life at a place you so despise? Move on and get ready4man.

[Traveller]

RE: Aha!

 

>Now

>it's become a parody of

>it's former self especially with

>the wave of conniving straight

>boys posturing like Kirk, JT,

>and Colt.

 

For a straight boy, he's pretty damn good at sucking face and cock. Not to mention that he can plow with the best of them.

 

Later.

 

PS. I haven't seen him since last fall. All this talk has reminded me of what an excellent fuck he was. I imagine it's time to go back in the water.

[Guest CZ]

RE: Aha!

 

>CZ,

>

>It is baffling as to why

>you persist in your crusade

>to preserve The Gaiety as

>it is now.

 

Where did I say or imply I wanted to preserve anything? All I wanted was to defend Denise from unfair criticism (yours, mostly), while suggesting that your long-standing beef against her & the Gaiety had a lot to do with your own inappropriate (i.e. unrealistic) attitude toward the place & what it has to offer.

 

Let's face it, judging from the scant specifics you're willing to provide about your tastes, you want to buy conventional gay sex with gay guys; and judging from your handle, the gay guys in question would ideally be twinks. Nothing wrong with that, of course. But the Gaiety is not now (and has never been) especially good hunting grounds for that kind of playmate.

 

So I can't understand why you rail against what happens there these days, or why you characterize it as a sad decline from some idealized (and largely imaginary) past. (Please note, I'm taking ONLY about the kinds of liaisons that are set up there and carried out elsewhere. The thrilling 'backstage' goings-on of decades past are, of course, sorely missed now; but that policy change was imposed on Denise--and back-rooms all over town--and could hardly be blamed on her.)

 

>Maybe you are a good friend

>of Denise's or someone who

>works at the place.

 

I'm a patron, just like you. (Sorry--you're an ex-patron. I almost forgot.)

 

>(Denise & the Gaiety) have

>become relics, the last remaining

>artifacts of an era gone

>by when Times Square had

>way more to offer.

>I'm sure she realizes it

>is now much more like

>a poor imitation of

>(Cupid's & Swinging Richard's)

 

Oh, sure. She frets about it day & night. And I guess if I lived in West Palm or Atlanta I'd be just as happy to frequent those places as you are. But we're talking about nightlife in New York, n'est-ce pas? Anyway, for you, it's not a question of either or now, is it? After all, you're boycotting the Gaiety. So be it. And having left the premises for good, wouldn't it be better to do the same with the whole subject?

[ready4boi]

RE: Aha!

 

Bitchboy your moniker is fitting. I am at the point of finding it amusing how CZ and others keep leaving messages defending Denise and The Gaiety, like she's a patron saint and the place was never a place to hire an escort and have an at least somewhat satisfactory time. That's where CZ is wrong because the escorts weren't always so disappointing in private shows and pulling stunts like this JT and Kirk. I wasn't referring to the back room but that of course gives those who weren't there an idea of how different it was.

[Traveller]

RE: Aha!

 

>I am at the point

>of finding it amusing how

>CZ and others keep leaving

>messages defending Denise and The

>Gaiety,

 

I can't stand the Gaiety (it's not nearly as much fun as Stellas). I'm just saying that Kirk is great in the rack.

 

Later.

 

PS. Why would anyone go to a joint where you can't take the edge off with a cocktail? Beyond me.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Aha!

 

What edge, Traveller?

[Guest MrB]

RE: Aha!

 

As a foreigner --but an eager visitor-- to your wonderful country and especially the city of New York, I have always found it difficult to understand WHY OH WHY you're not allowed to have a glass of something while watching the show at the Gaiety. It would be so much more civilised. Having said that, it's still a great place--nothing like it anywhere. Cupid's is great but Denise has better guys. (I like Stella's too--and is PapiCock Speed Fridays still happening?) If you don't want to hire from the stage, just don't. I rarely do anymore, T is right you can buy more fun from Stella's. If you don't enjoy the show either, by all means stay away from the Gaiety. I always run straight from the airport myself :-)

 

 

MrB

[+ Lucky]

RE: A Glass of Something

 

If they serve alcohol, they can't have nudity, is the way I understand it. Doesn't that fruit punch on weekends do it for you? hehehe

[Guest MrB]

RE: A Glass of Something

 

Thanks, Lucky... I am aware of it but I do not UNDERSTAND. Alcohol and nudity happens to be my favourite combination.

 

 

Have fun!

 

 

MrB

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

RE: A Glass of Something

 

Simple Mr. B...

 

The intent is to discourage such businesses. Since they cannot outright BAN them, they REGULATE them. ONe way to regulate them out of business (they thought) is to remove the profit from alcohol sales from the enterprise. No alcohol, no profit (or little), no 'disreputable' business. To Denise's credit, she's making money anyway... or she is one hell of an altruist. (LOL)

[Guest MrB]

RE: A Glass of Something

 

Thank you, TY. This I believe to be true. I love your country dearly and have learned that whenever you say the reason is money, you're not joking and you're not telling lies. You keep that for the moral majority :-)

 

 

MrB