Jump to content

Yourfav in NYC


queensboroboy

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

So I’ve met him for a massage. He’s definitely real, he’s bulked up recently in the past couple of weeks (the pics where he’s cut are recent but he’s bulking for a bodybuilding competition ) so he’s beefier but still has a killer body. He’s a Colombian from Medellin and he’s really nice and super super sexy. Massage skills are not bad, I would give them a 7/10. There is one thing that worried me about him, he has two small open sores below his abdominal area above the pubic area that kinda freaked me out afterwards. In hindsight I definitely should have asked him what they were. It kinda sucks because he and I really clicked. 

Edited by oclatin92xxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oclatin92xxx said:

So I’ve met him for a massage. He’s definitely real, he’s bulked up recently in the past couple of weeks (the pics where he’s cut are recent but he’s bulking for a bodybuilding competition ) so he’s beefier but still has a killer body. He’s a Colombian from Medellin and he’s really nice and super super sexy. Massage skills are not bad, I would give them a 7/10. There is one thing that worried me about him, he has two small open sores below his abdominal area above the pubic area that kinda freaked me out afterwards. In hindsight I definitely should have asked him what they were. It kinda sucks because he and I really clicked. 

Hm....  that seems...  iffy.

Any answer to his "kissing" situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, lanyc said:

Hm....  that seems...  iffy.

Any answer to his "kissing" situation?

Not sure, I only got a massage which shifted to me sucking his dick during the erotic part. I’m sure if you get him as a scort he might be open to kissing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oclatin92xxx said:

Not sure, I only got a massage which shifted to me sucking his dick during the erotic part. I’m sure if you get him as a scort he might be open to kissing. 

Now that raises a question. Oral is not included in his listing of "into's," yet he was agreeable to it with you. From time to time, I see provider ads that do not list oral and I am always puzzled by it, not knowing if he is altogether opposed to it, or if it's simply so common as to be understood, therefore not listed. (I assume that to not list it, a deliberate choice would have to be made in composing the add.)

I knew a provider years ago, beautiful boy with handsome face, great smooth muscles, and a gifted endowment. He loved to fuck, but did not like his dick sucked; only let me do it once, which was disappointing.

I realize each person is unique, but is there a consensus of experience that omitting oral from the list makes it prohibited, or is to be generally assumed as okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Major abdominal surgical scar and an array of small wounds, some evidently more healed than others. He has not attempted to obscure these in various photos posted. I would surmise laparoscopic incisions. If so, these are not called sores, and that kind of term may get anchored in the minds of readers.

Better to ask the source than post innuendo. As acknowledged, one can open the convo with a provider by asking what is important to know about the noticeable in terms of guarding him from wound infection or exacerbation of some condition. Then adjust according to his response. Or inquire afterwards if mode of contact is sustained. There’s usually a way of avoiding putting someone on the spot. 

Edited by SirBillybob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SirBillybob said:

Major abdominal surgical scar and an array of small wounds, some evidently more healed than others. He has not attempted to obscure these in various photos posted. I would surmise laparoscopic incisions. If so, these are not called sores, and that kind of term may get anchored in the minds of readers.

Better to ask the source than post innuendo. As acknowledged, one can open the convo with a provider by asking what is important to know about the noticeable in terms of guarding him from wound infection or exacerbation of some condition. Then adjust according to his response. Or inquire afterwards if mode of contact is sustained. There’s usually a way of avoiding putting someone on the spot. 

So I have a bit of experience with laparoscopic scars, I have three myself since I donated my Kidney in October and what I saw did not appear reminiscent to those specific types of scars. I hope they are but they looked like sores to me, this was because they were small and open. Now again, in hindsight I should have asked but the reason I’m making it public is because I feel like it might be important for future clients to know about something they will eventually see themselves. I don’t apologize for being honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wsc said:

Now that raises a question. Oral is not included in his listing of "into's," yet he was agreeable to it with you. From time to time, I see provider ads that do not list oral and I am always puzzled by it, not knowing if he is altogether opposed to it, or if it's simply so common as to be understood, therefore not listed. (I assume that to not list it, a deliberate choice would have to be made in composing the add.)

I knew a provider years ago, beautiful boy with handsome face, great smooth muscles, and a gifted endowment. He loved to fuck, but did not like his dick sucked; only let me do it once, which was disappointing.

I realize each person is unique, but is there a consensus of experience that omitting oral from the list makes it prohibited, or is to be generally assumed as okay?

Honestly if it’s not listed by a provider it doesn’t hurt to ask. I would be 100% surprised if he wasn’t open to oral if you hired him as a scort. Since I approached him through Rentmasseur I guess it was more of a YMMV situation for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oclatin92xxx said:

Honestly if it’s not listed by a provider it doesn’t hurt to ask. I would be 100% surprised if he wasn’t open to oral if you hired him as a scort. Since I approached him through Rentmasseur I guess it was more of a YMMV situation for me. 

What's his name on Rentmasseur?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I would emphasize with my hospital patients in my day, one’s personal experience may be limited for interpreting another’s medical phenomena or needs, and vice versa. Of course, however, it is tempting and common to draw on personal reference points.

If procedure-experienced as a patient, all the better position with which to follow up with the provider after the fact. Common possible general vulnerability history, in this case including organ donorship (obviously commendable) further supporting alertness to disease risks, empathic attunement to possibly mutual general medical challenges, etc.

Again, IMHO better to be the one, as having been the one up close and personal already, than passing on to the next guy an unsubstantiated conjecture to assess before or during a possible future liaison. The trend would be that prospective new clients would avoid a booking in order to avoid something understandably anticipated to be uncomfortable.

Other types of red flags are comparably incontrovertible and the information favour passed on is of a different nature.

Edited by SirBillybob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SirBillybob said:

As I would emphasize with my hospital patients in my day, one’s personal experience may be limited for interpreting another’s medical phenomena or needs, and vice versa. Of course, however, it is tempting and common to draw on personal reference points.

If procedure-experienced as a patient, all the better position with which to follow up with the provider after the fact. Common possible general vulnerability history, in this case including organ donorship (obviously commendable) further supporting alertness to disease risks, empathic attunement to possibly mutual medical challenges, etc.

Again, IMHO better to be the one, as having been up close and personal already, than passing on to the next guy an unsubstantiated conjecture to assess before or during a possible future liaison. 

Rather than using the word “sore” would you prefer for me to use the word “lesion”? Maybe they weren’t sores but they were 100% two small open lesions or wounds or whatever you would like me to call them. Either way they were there, if you look at his RM profile in the first pic they were located in the area where he has the dark marking below his lower ab. In his shirtless vid where he’s posing you can see the area is red, well that area had two open lesions when I saw him in mid January. 

IMG_0536.jpeg

Edited by oclatin92xxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, oclatin92xxx said:

Rather than using the word “sore” would you prefer for me to use the word “lesion”? Maybe they weren’t sores but they were 100% two small open lesions or wounds or whatever you would like me to call them. Either way they were there, if you look at his RM profile in the first pic they were located in the area where he has the dark marking below his lower ab. In his shirtless vid where he’s posing you can see the area is red, well that area had two open lesions when I saw him in mid January. 

I think you are open to broader interpretation and you grasp that “sores” have a particular connotation, of course more so in recent communicable disease context. Only he wouid know the true skinny, I suppose. I don’t have vid access. One of his photos in the public domain depicts what is obviously a major surgical scar and what appears to be an unconcealed puncture about 75% due right of his naval, with seemingly older spot scarring in the area. Naturally the photo dates are impossible to ascertain.

The readership breadth here would likely not make or break his practice.

We have gotten to fleshing it out a bit more.

If these are episodic roving phenomena and geographically spread out in an inexplicable way, however labelled, it does raise questions. 

Edited by SirBillybob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...