coriolis888 Posted December 10, 2025 Posted December 10, 2025 On 12/5/2025 at 1:33 AM, SirBillybob said: If Rentmen disappeared that would not have one iota of influence on the abundance of worthwhile transactional sexual intimacy with a range of candidates in which I regularly engage. Rentmen to me is a perfect example of context in which what can actually be satisfactorily obtained in other ways contrasts with the importuning of hordes of ad platform labourers seeking payment for time. The modest costs of subscriptions simply yield reinforcement of such a longstanding impression as well as the benefits of being steered towards utilizing one’s time to plan accordingly for alternative hire sources. YMMV and I’m glad it serves a purpose for some. BTW, if anybody these days finds himself in need of invoking the law regarding some kind of clinical disease transmission statute he simply had not gone about the transactional sexual hire, it’s screening and in-person behavioural components, correctly. Is there a possibility that you could reword the above. I read it a few times but I do not know what it says. Thanks for understanding.
+ SirBillybob Posted December 10, 2025 Posted December 10, 2025 8 hours ago, coriolis888 said: Is there a possibility that you could reword the above. I read it a few times but I do not know what it says. Thanks for understanding. It would have to be much more blunt, hence veering towards impolite, but you appear to have that style down. I think enough readers got it to my satisfaction.
Recommended Posts