Point 202: someone submitted a very bad Google review.

[SirBillybob]

28 minutes ago, José Soplanucas said:

Let's try to redirect the discussion back to the topic. Entitled "first worlders" are a pain in the ass, ruining the traveling experience for many. Hopefully, some of the many friends who read this blog to educate themselves before starting an adventure will take advantage of an informative thread.

If that’s the topic my posts here are on the mark. My few bad experiences have been with fellow travellers that are clearly not well. One is best advised to roll with it. 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SirBillybob

[SouthOfTheBorder]

i stand corrected - “banned” may not be accurate

It’s actually restricted or on-probation 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SouthOfTheBorder

[SirBillybob]

1 hour ago, SouthOfTheBorder said:

just don’t call it  Copy Of My Note To Our Moderator(s)

although epic in sheer lunacy & a case-study in online chicanery - I don’t think anyone is up for repeat

There’s no complete predicting of systemic equifinality, assistant to the assistant to the assistant AG, but with a bit of insight and trust the chips may land in decent interpretable order. 

But do keep regaling us about your apparent entrapment in your own annoyances.

Signed: First Nations truth and reconciliation expert witness.

Edited June 24, 2023 by SirBillybob

[SirBillybob]

53 minutes ago, SouthOfTheBorder said:

i stand corrected - “banned” may not be accurate

It’s actually restricted or on-probation 

Your obvious sad self-imposed penance is assiduously splitting hairs ‘til the cows come home.

[solacesoul]

2 hours ago, SirBillybob said:

Do you really think somebody was centring out another for shits and giggles, not for stimulating the trickling in of puzzle pieces, even today, for an RCMP report on missing national and provincial government documentation ostensibly lifted during a toilet break during lunch with a co-member imposter while at his lodgings, a sociopathic misanthrope recently allegedly defaulting on payday loans, the consequence of said pilfering requiring cash payment of Metro return home fare on March 5th, 2020? Is it really such a mystery that a DM would be sent exclusively to an apparent arch-nemesis shortly thereafter, aiming for empathic attunement from the absolute least likely candidate, from somebody notoriously known for blind overreactivity and emotional volatility, but not for the chance of subsequent arch-nemesis posted subtext for the relevantly involved to tune into?

Bobert:

You keep harping on this one younger guy, the one you fished around for information on, but there are 4 separate, unrelated posters / board members / travelers. The one that you keep posting about thinking it’s (only) him is not even the main one who, after having direct contact with you, made the grave warning about you. You can try to malign all of their character all you wish in your attempt at self-defense, but it won’t work. At least two are highly-respected, longterm posters who have no reason to trash anyone, and quite frankly, in all of their years of contributions to boards and travel, it’s never been part of their displayed character. In fact, other than you, I’ve never really seen or heard them say anything untoward about anyone. And when it was said about you, it wasn’t mean-spirited, vicious or catty, it was just matter-of-factly, in a “this is what transpired between us and this is why I recommend maintaining distance.”

So, maybe, just maybe, Bobert, it isn’t them. Maybe it’s you. 

So…

Circling back to the original subject: taking accountability of one’s own actions. 

[solacesoul]

2 hours ago, SirBillybob said:

This was a defense in your behalf, Bobert.
 

My mistake. I’ll never do that again. 

[SirBillybob]

2 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

This was a defense in your behalf

Not a defense if a distortion, a false claim of knowledge of ethnicity, and embedded among a series of put downs. So, what we call up here disingenuous stank. 

[SouthOfTheBorder]

9 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

This was a defense in your behalf, Bobert.

that’s Bobbalino to you !

[solacesoul]

2 hours ago, José Soplanucas said:

Although I am not a Karen

Here’s an OP related tale, Pre-Karen term:

First visit to Apolo Sauna in Santo Domingo (maybe 2009-2010?), an obviously gay white American wanted a full refund for his “unproductive” sauna visit. The owner (a Cuban now living in the DR) refused. White American Gay Karen immediately says: “if you don’t give me a refund, I’m going to write a VERY negative review on Trip Advisor about your establishment! And ALL the American and European tourists will see it!”

[SouthOfTheBorder]

1 minute ago, solacesoul said:

White American Gay Karen immediately says:

and here, the Karens run to the mods 

not sure what they call ‘‘em up north 

[solacesoul]

7 minutes ago, SirBillybob said:

a false claim of knowledge of ethnicity

Ok, Rachel Dolezal. I guess you can be a black woman, too! 

[SouthOfTheBorder]

Just now, solacesoul said:

I guess you can be a black woman, too! 

it’s possible - only 3 aliases are known 

[SouthOfTheBorder]

false online reviews are terrible - yet we know the games played behind cloaks of quasi anonymity

back on topic 

 

[solacesoul]

Just now, SouthOfTheBorder said:

it’s possible - only 3 aliases are known 

I mean, seriously. He wants to pretend as if multiple, independent sources don’t already know who he is offline.

(And before he starts freaking out and running to moderators at this site too, rest assured: no one cares enough about you to reveal your actual name / photo. Honestly, you’re not even that remotely interesting.)

[SirBillybob]

42 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

Bobert:

You keep harping on this one younger guy, the one you fished around for information on, but there are 4 separate, unrelated posters / board members / travelers. The one that you keep posting about thinking it’s (only) him is not even the main one who, after having direct contact with you, made the grave warning about you. You can try to malign all of their character all you wish in your attempt at self-defense, but it won’t work. At least two are highly-respected, longterm posters who have no reason to trash anyone, and quite frankly, in all of their years of contributions to boards and travel, it’s never been part of their displayed character. In fact, other than you, I’ve never really seen or heard them say anything untoward about anyone. And when it was said about you, it wasn’t mean-spirited, vicious or catty, it was just matter-of-factly, in a “this is what transpired between us and this is why I recommend maintaining distance.”

So, maybe, just maybe, Bobert, it isn’t them. Maybe it’s you. 

So…

Circling back to the original subject: taking accountability of one’s own actions. 

Well finally a confirmation. And a whittling down to sources of YOUR questionable spin-doctoring. I am aware of my history of interpersonal transactions. I have also received, and maintained, written unsolicited correspondence warning me to keep my distance from, ahem, certain ‘angry’ members. You may be surprised about the source and how backchannel gossip plays out with oddly mutating alliances. You may be also surprised about recent correspondence with I presume to be the aforementioned seasoned members you prevail on for your flimsy case.

Why would you in particular require a heads up about me? This just smacks of self-aggrandizing reputation spin-doctoring and buttresses my impressions made in the first place.

Of course accountability is a governing heuristic, as is taking with grains of salt the number of stars allocated to anybody anything anywhere.

Are you going to keep referencing entitled Americans? A very few are my bane, but I would not extrapolate from a sample size of 2 or 3. I might situate it based on proportional representation of nationality but that would be a gross distortion. 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SirBillybob

[SouthOfTheBorder]

15 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

. He wants to pretend as if multiple, independent sources don’t already know who he is offline

every single point made is negated by the simple fact that he thinks nobody gets the aliases, meanwhile anyone paying attention does understand the aliases, yet he continues down that path 

using multiple aliases online is hardly new & expected to a degree - the odd thing here is that it’s soooooooo obvious 

 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SouthOfTheBorder

[solacesoul]

10 minutes ago, SirBillybob said:

Why would you in particular require a heads up about me?

“This is who he is. This is what he looks like. This is what he did to me. Here is our correspondence. Be warned.”

I hope that answers your question.

Trust me. I certainly did not go looking for it. I leave the USA to get away from pasty old stuffy white guys. I am certainly not looking for them (or to hang out with them) when abroad.

 

 

Edited June 24, 2023 by solacesoul

[solacesoul]

3 minutes ago, SouthOfTheBorder said:

every single point made is negated by the simple fact that you think nobody gets the aliases, meanwhile anyone paying attention does understand the aliases, yet you continue down that path 

using multiple aliases online is hardly new & expected to a degree - the odd thing here is that it’s soooooooo obvious 

 

It’s so bizarre how he doubles down on this — when a simple, “yeah, it’s me, so what?”  would’ve worked. 

[SouthOfTheBorder]

this is all so predictable- just like before 

Triggered

 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SouthOfTheBorder

[SirBillybob]

30 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

It’s so bizarre how he doubles down on this — when a simple, “yeah, it’s me, so what?”  would’ve worked. 

That is not the point. What would have worked? What is bizarre is anybody that makes links without consent and paints lack of capitulation with further character critique. It brought you out of your hole with intel and that was the main exigency.

I did not link you with another similar board. That was your prerogative. Anybody with a modicum of class won’t impute pseudonym links between, say, two Queerty handles that represent the same argumentative overly opinionated poster. Those iterations are one’s autonomous choice.

At the end of the day, I am up against a few posters that serve the epitome of obnoxiousness. 

As far as personal significance goes, that you would self-appoint as arbiter simply further underlines grandiosity. Class: 0 stars. Intelligence: 4

Edited June 24, 2023 by SirBillybob

[solacesoul]

On these types of boards and in saunas over the years, there have been (verifiably) posters / members who in real life are: federally elected politicians, appointed judges, famous fashion designers, (legitimate, non-porn) film directors and producers, award-winning journalists, airline pilots, plastic surgeons, US attorneys, music business executives, college professors, and the list goes on.

No one knows (and very few care) because these posters / members aren’t so obnoxious, and they aren’t violating other members / clients’ personal space and right to privacy.

[SirBillybob]

11 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

On these types of boards and in saunas over the years, there have been (verifiably) posters / members who in real life are: federally elected politicians, appointed judges, famous fashion designers, (legitimate, non-porn) film directors and producers, award-winning journalists, airline pilots, plastic surgeons, US attorneys, music business executives, college professors, and the list goes on.

No one knows (and very few care) because these posters / members aren’t so obnoxious, and they aren’t violating other members / clients’ personal space and right to privacy.

By the latter I take it you are referencing contrasts to self-appointed judges and non-bogus surgeons, both categories needing to puff themselves up and live in the board baseboards rather than attend to loftier tasks within either faux or genuine status. If you are reluctantly inducted (sarcasm, in the event the dim read this) into hall monitor and image-smearing, my guess is envy viz the former pro listing. The vigilante commitment is peculiarly commendable but puzzling. 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SirBillybob

[solacesoul]

13 minutes ago, SirBillybob said:

By the latter I take it you are referencing contrasts to self-appointed judges and non-bogus surgeons, both categories needing to puff themselves up and live in the board baseboards rather than attend to loftier tasks within either faux or genuine status. 

Genuine question:

Even if what you’re saying was correct — which again, is highly doubtful considering your warped perception skills over your posting years —  why would anyone owe you their curriculum vitae, if all you’re doing is discussing the joys of hiring for sex and then possibly meeting at a sex work establishment, maybe even a meal before or after? Why would you feel this somehow entitles you to know anything at all about their personal lives, including but not limited to their educational or employment history?

Edited June 24, 2023 by solacesoul

[SirBillybob]

56 minutes ago, solacesoul said:

Genuine question:

Even if what you’re saying was correct — which again, is highly doubtful considering your warped perception skills over your posting years —  why would anyone owe you their curriculum vitae, if all you’re doing is discussing the joys of hiring for sex and then possibly meeting a sex work establishment, maybe even a meal before or after? Why would you feel this somehow entitles you to know anything at all about their personal lives, including but not limited to their educational or employment history?

More manipulation. Do you actually socialize in real life?

I have not been privy to CV details, authentic or bogus, beyond any poster’s public message board extant representation of professional status and institutional context already submitted.

I don’t socialize based on ‘hierarchical’ status. 

So now it was acceptable to talk shop with two Brazilian physicians that happened to be seated with me on two separate recent flights, one of which culminated in a family dinner with a view of 6-foot snowbanks, but the content of some 1,400 text exchanges with a fellow ‘sex tourist’ is restricted to trade playbook content? That      is       insane. 

Content and good will dynamics that would have made it easy early on to wiggle out of a misrepresentation and carry on friending? 

Moreover, it is not lost on me that casting me and my fellow queer sex tourists in such a restricted circumscribed way simply further calls into question and explains the inconstancy and apparent illegitimacy of their various impressions, as manipulatively described by you within your bonkers conceptualization of the intersect of trade interest and human interactional normalcy.

These trite dust-ups can be as simple as squabbles about who is hot. 😂

What I am entitled to is the proclamation that you are a compete nut. 

What is in common among your tiny paltry dream team of evidentiary character witnesses is the notion that those sex tourists positioning selves as a cut above simply need to be cut down to size. I’ll discuss it over drinks with one next winter. 
—-

Ripcord. Out. Pizza (well, not actually). As much as you are trying but failing to make my day with Succession out of the frame and Yellowjackets on hiatus. 

Date with recent recipient of USA passport and he is just as nice as my bio American cousins.

Bye bye, toxicity. That includes bottomless SOTheB bargain basement butt-ins never seeing the light of day at auction, or … not never. 

Edited June 24, 2023 by SirBillybob

[solacesoul]

1 hour ago, SirBillybob said:

More manipulation. Do you actually socialize in real life?

I have not been privy to CV details, authentic or bogus, beyond any poster’s public message board extant representation of professional status and institutional context already submitted.

I don’t socialize based on ‘hierarchical’ status. 

So now it was acceptable to talk shop with two Brazilian physicians that happened to be seated with me on two separate recent flights, one of which culminated in a family dinner with a view of 6-foot snowbanks, but the content of some 1,400 text exchanges with a fellow ‘sex tourist’ is restricted to trade playbook content? That      is       insane. 

Content and good will dynamics that would have made it easy early on to wiggle out of a misrepresentation and carry on friending? 

Moreover, it is not lost on me that casting me and my fellow queer sex tourists in such a restricted circumscribed way simply further calls into question and explains the inconstancy and apparent illegitimacy of their various impressions, as manipulatively described by you within your bonkers conceptualization of the intersect of trade interest and human interactional normalcy.

These trite dust-ups can be as simple as squabbles about who is hot. 😂

What I am entitled to is the proclamation that you are a compete nut. 

What is in common among your tiny paltry dream team of evidentiary character witnesses is the notion that those sex tourists positioning selves as a cut above simply need to be cut down to size. I’ll discuss it over drinks with one next winter. 
—-

Ripcord. Out. Pizza (well, not actually). As much as you are trying but failing to make my day with Succession out of the frame and Yellowjackets on hiatus. 

Date with recent recipient of USA passport and he is just as nice as my bio American cousins.

Bye bye, toxicity. That includes bottomless SOTheB bargain basement butt-ins never seeing the light of day at auction, or … not never. 

You keep focusing on ONE young man that you feel you can easily malign.

Now, explain away the others you doxxed and made inappropriate contact with.

Maybe you forgot because you do it so often. 

Edited June 24, 2023 by solacesoul