Jump to content

411 on Matthew_NYC


dutchal
This topic is 839 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

Nope. #5 face pic shows very obvious body art that doesn't appear in the body pix

I don't think so.  The tattoo is positioned mostly under his arm.  In the pics where it's not evident that's likely because of angles of shots, etc.  It's also possible the tat is recent, although he doesn't look older in some pics than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, former lurker said:

 It's also possible the tat is recent,

Which is my guess...and NO this body art should be evident in most of the other pix. The angles would reveal the marks perfectly. So guessing all the pix are older except one with most of the body hidden ...so gonna make a guess that he's not in the same condition today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of the pics show any of the tats, although one of the videos does.  Care should be taken when drawing conclusions about his current appearance.  Interestingly, it looks like the reviews (which include some repeats) carried over despite the name change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...