Fucking hot straight guy ass

[hiJinX]

>Here's another full-on view of that ass

>

>http://www.XTube.com/play_re.php?v=mWGq0_S318_&cl=6HwWK_S318_

>

>Seems like he is a semi-pro, with a website. Lots of vids in

>xtube, though.

 

He's amateur but prolific, sells clips on his personal site but doesnt do it full time. One of his vids is a clip of him being featured on a Real Sex type show. He posted a vid on a lark and became a suprise online sensation.

 

He fucking makes me wish I had a pussy.

 

Must drive his neighbors crazy hearing all that fucking and screaming. I'd love it. :-)

[RockHard]

"He fucking makes me wish I had a pussy."

 

Another fine example of "fucking" as intensifier adverb.

[hiJinX]

Actually, I meant to write "His fucking makes me with I had a pussy" or "He fucks so well, I wish I had a pussy."

[AdamSmith]

>Meaning only takes place in the act of

>communication between author and reader—and that’s an insight

>from the EARLY 20th century.

>

>But hey—I’m open to learning here.

 

That's good to hear.

 

You state the premise of reader-response theory as fact. But you must know that, at the same time reception theory was getting going in the first part of the 20th century, the various branches of formalist criticism, especially the formulators of the New Criticism (also the Russian formalists, and by implication the first of the Chicago School), were making cogent counterarguments that meaning inheres in the work itself and is autonomous of the reader. In this context, their identification of the intentional fallacy was a crucial counterpoint to the affective fallacy that you note.

 

Although the New Criticism per se drifted out of fashion, the notion that attributes inhere in the work itself, rather than being generated by contingencies between text and reader, remained a root assumption of structuralism, and now many of the various poststructuralisms.

 

(Sorry late to the party. When this thread was full tilt I was in media res with Andre and some other cuties. :9 )

[bartleby]

The one thing that Mr. Rockhard seems to have amply dmeonstrated is that an adverb needs a verb in order to be recognized as such. Mr. Tom was right.

[+ Tom Isern]

I was told that there was an intelligent response here—so I’m back, even though I said I wouldn’t be. Sorry Rick and Lanky—you’ll just have to suffer! But if you find this thread so awfully tedious and boring and cock-blocking, why not move on? It’s easy. When you see the thread, simply don’t click on it and it won’t open and you won’t be forced to read it! How about that? Simple solution for a simple problem!

 

Thanks Adam Smith! The idea that the reader has a role in the production of meaning is not, however, limited to reader-response theories, is it? I’d argue that it’s pretty front and center in all poststructuralism, in fact, that it is pretty much assumed in all critical theory after structuralism. And yes, the new critics solidly rejected intention, and they have moved “out of fashion,” as you say, but intentionality, except for the occasional blip on the map (E.D. Hirsch), has never regained any serious credibility.

 

I’m curious: You seem to have an independent mind not swayed by the exuberant theatrics of some on this thread. What do you make of the idea that “fucking” is an adverb in the phrase “fucking hot straight guy ass”? You side-stepped what seems to be the bone of contention.

[Rick Munroe]

>What do

>you make of the idea that “fucking” is an adverb in the phrase

>“fucking hot straight guy ass”?

 

http://theroosterstrikes.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/beating-a-dead-horse.gif

[RockHard]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

"I was told that there was an intelligent response here—so I’m back"

 

Oh, Tom, you bloviate with such delicious conceit and vanity. What a turn on!

 

"even though I said I wouldn’t be (back)"

 

I know, honey. It's hard to resist beating a dead horse or beating a fellow escort to pulp. I guess we're all a bunch of hypocrites...or a bunch of silly women who enjoy the right to change our minds.

 

"...the various branches of formalist criticism, especially the formulators of the New Criticism (also the Russian formalists..."

 

"I’d argue that it’s pretty front and center in all poststructuralism."

 

Fellas, I don't know about you but I'm ERECT!

 

Quick, somebody hit me over the head with that Wolfgang Puck 5-quart Electric Pressure Cooker I saw recently on HSN. I'm afraid my hard-on will never deflate after reading such intellectual antinomianism and scholarly phenomenology, stroked with conscience venerableness for hermeneutical thinking.

 

Too bad Tom Isern is old (in escort years, of course). With the sniff of a twink, AdamSmith writes more sycophantically. At least that doesn't go over ncm2169's head.

[AdamSmith]

>Thanks Adam Smith! The idea that the reader has a role in the

>production of meaning is not, however, limited to

>reader-response theories, is it? I’d argue that it’s pretty

>front and center in all poststructuralism, in fact, that it is

>pretty much assumed in all critical theory after

>structuralism.

 

Well, it is implicit in a lot, but 'front and center'? In fact your comment makes me realize that evading consideration of the role of the reader seems a common theme of considerable post-structuralist thought. E.g.:

 

(1) Eco and the other semioticist followers of Peirce, despite Eco titling books "The Role of the Reader" etc., go on and on about their holy trinity of object (concept that a sign encodes), representamen (the perceivable part of a sign) and interpretant (the meaning one obtains from the sign), but never really get to the heart of what the reader is doing in all that.

 

(2) Derrida, de Man, and others of the boa deconstructors don't seem to care about the role of the reader. They gaze fully as fixedly at the work itself as Cleanth Brooks et al. ever did.

 

(3) Even the New Historicists, for all their focus on social pressures as the overdetermined producers of everything, focus on how those forces acted on writers much more than on readers.

 

But I could be wrong about all that!

 

>What do

>you make of the idea that “fucking” is an adverb in the phrase

>“fucking hot straight guy ass”? You side-stepped what seems

>to be the bone of contention.

 

I admit I did not, and do not, see what the brouhaha is about. That great touchstone Wikipedia (let caveats rain down, but nonetheless) sums up how I always understood it:

 

"An adverb is a part of speech. It is any word that modifies any other part of language: verbs, adjectives (including numbers), clauses, sentences and other adverbs, except for nouns; modifiers of nouns are primarily determiners and adjectives."

 

So. "Fucking hot straight guy ass" -- "Fucking" functions here as an adverb modifying the adjective "hot", which in turn modifies the noun clause "straight guy ass". Inside which "straight guy" is an adjectival phrase modifying the noun "ass".

 

There is a valid point that the phrase could be construed more than one way. But your initial claims that it must be construed differently than above mystify me.

 

Also, your assertion that there must be a verb somewhere in the construction for there to be an adverb seems to ignore the fact that if a word modifies an adjective, it is an adverb, period. We often speak and write in phrases without a verb. You can tortuously hunt out an implied verb, but to what end?

[AdamSmith]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

>Quick, somebody hit me over the head with that Wolfgang Puck

>5-quart Electric Pressure Cooker I saw recently on HSN. I'm

>afraid my hard-on will never deflate after reading such

>intellectual antinomianism and scholarly phenomenology,

>stroked with conscience venerableness for hermeneutical

>thinking.

 

Ah, the boards need you! Clearly so do I.

 

>With

>the sniff of a twink

 

After all, what else is there, in the end?

[RockHard]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

"I admit I did not, and do not, see what the brouhaha is about.

 

So. "Fucking hot straight guy ass" -- "Fucking" functions here as an adverb modifying the adjective "hot", which in turn modifies the noun clause "straight guy ass". Inside which "straight guy" is an adjectival phrase modifying the noun "ass".

 

There is a valid point that the phrase could be construed more than one way. But your initial claims that it must be construed differently than above mystify me."

 

Ahhh, AdamSmith, my favorite escort forum wordsmith. I sure hope your I.Q. comes close to that of William Safire's boy. Something tells me, given what we know about Isern's personality, your word will not be the last. Tom can't let critical theory after structuralism go and he will never chuckle at future "smart ass" jokes from little Ricky.

 

We can only hope your post puts an end to the longest English lesson this board has ever endured. (Eat your heart out MER. Wait, you never had one.) I'm sure hairy Miss Munroe will think twice before ever writing a phrase with the word "fucking' in it again. (Readers can only hope.)

 

"Ah, the boards need you! Clearly so do I."

 

Such sweetness. Thank you. But this does not signal a return for me. Without beating another dead horse, deej knows why I have no desire to fully participate here. The men who post here deserve better. I love my escorts.

 

AdamSmith, I do continue to read your posts, including the colorless cerebral crap. I'd love to be a fly on the wall while you're frolicking with a skinny, toothless, 18-year-old high school drop-out. I'll bet the conversation would be more fun than watching the frolic.

 

"Rick, I'm one of the people who is staying away from this site--and it's largely because of the belittling way you treated me when I posted my reservations about marriage."

 

If I would have known a year ago that this was the way to get Isern to shut up, I would have married Rick and Derek and paid Rick to belittle the big mouth.

 

"I’m sure that Rick will continue his game of insult and name-calling."

 

Tom Isern is too VAIN and CONCEITED (any gay man with an email addee "tophunk" rings red flag alarms of insecurity and self-aggrandizement) to realize that when he accuses ANYONE of "continuing a game of insult and name-calling" he makes himself look like the BIGGEST ASSHOLE LOSER HYPOCRITE. Nobody on this board is better practiced at the game than Tom Isern.

 

I love when escorts participate here until they go out of their way to destroy every other fantasy besides one involving shitting on a client or shitting on a fellow escort (which is not for me). If an escort shows his true personality on a review board, that personality better be sexy, kind, sweet, funny and loving because that's the kind of man I want to pay to fuck. The rest of you over-sexed queens can go fuck yourselves for money.

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

>I'm sure hairy Miss Munroe will

>think twice before ever writing a phrase with the word

>"fucking' in it again.

 

He don't know me very well, do he?

 

http://betterthingsahead.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/elmer_fudd_bugs_bunny.jpg

 

Fucking Smart Ass

[a href=http://www.daddysreviews.com/review.php?who=rick_and_derek_nyc]Reviews[/a] [a href=http://www.men4rentnow.com/ds/search.asp?cmd=view&id=140448&Login=SuperSexyDuo]Pics[/a] [a href=http://rickmunroe.blogspot.com]Blog[/a]

[RockHard]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

>>I'm sure hairy Miss Munroe will

>>think twice before ever writing a phrase with the word

>>"fucking' in it again.

>

>He don't know me very well, do he?

 

Please, complete sentences only. Thank you.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

What I don't get is why such a big, smart guy like Rock Hard is going to let deej keep him out of the game. Isn't that empowering deej with abut a trillion times more clout than he actually has?

 

There's room for everybody, well, with a couple of exceptions. Deej may not be the best guy for backup administrator, but Sarah Palin isn't the best candidate either. Deej is great at computer advice, and Sarah's got a daughter with smokin' taste in men! So we welcome them all.

[RockHard]

RE: Fucking wrong.

 

You're wrong, Lucky. I own my decisions. That empowers me.

 

If I'm dissatisfied with the service of a restaurant and decide not to return, even though I like some of the food, how on earth is that empowering the restaurant?

 

I'm sure deej has a heart somewhere amongst his multiple usernames, you know, the ones he uses to keep order and make himself feel better. I'm happy, too, that Daddy has a loyal friend who knows a thing or two about I.T. and whose services won't break the already broken bank account.

 

The truth is, I found another board with 40,000 members, which is extremely well run, caters to some brilliant creative young'ins, where I can play old, wise man whose been there done that. I'm having a ball. Not to mention, young, creative minds are very inspiring: My movie project is finding plenty of food for thought.

 

Now if only I can find a fun place where it's OK to say CUNT.

[AdamSmith]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

>AdamSmith, I do continue to read your posts, including the

>colorless cerebral crap.

 

Too many thanks. Of course color, like so much else, is in the eye of the beholder. (Viz. the reader-response business!)

 

In any event, man cannot live by twinks alone.

 

One's best efforts notwithstanding.

[Guest Delaware Man]

RE: Fucking hot!

 

Fine, stay the FUCK away. By the way Rick is not "Little Ricky: as you allege.I have seen him. Have you? You are a CANCER- negative all the time. Go type your venom elsewhere, you impotent, pencil dick.

[RockHard]

RE: Fucking stupid!

 

"I am just a dumb hick from Dullawhere."

 

You said it, CUNT.

 

"By the way Rick is not "Little Ricky: as you allege.I have seen him. Have you?"

 

Anyone who truly knows Rick Munroe is fully aware of his fondness for "I Love Lucy." My "little Ricky" reference was a nod to Lucy and her fans. (I've met Lucille Ball, have you?) But, since you're "just a dumb hick from Dullawhere" with an eraser dick for a brain, you're excused for speaking from your cunt.

 

(Damn that felt good!) :-)

[+ Lucky]

RE: Fucking stupid!

 

Ha! That reminds of me Lucy's famous quote "With Rock Hard for a friend, who needs an enemy?"

 

They sure were a fun couple while it lasted, eh Rock?

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Fucking stupid!

 

>"I am just a dumb hick from

>Dullawhere."

 

I would never describe DelawareMan or our next Vice President Joe Biden as either dumb or a hick. The word "hunk" does come to mind, though. :9

 

If I'm Little Ricky, do I have to start taking drum lessons? And won't Fred and Ethel mind the noise?

[MiamiLooker]

RE: Fucking wrong.

 

>The truth is, I found another board with 40,000 members, which

>is extremely well run, caters to some brilliant creative

>young'ins, where I can play old, wise man whose been there

>done that. I'm having a ball. Not to mention, young, creative

>minds are very inspiring: My movie project is finding plenty

>of food for thought.

>

>Now if only I can find a fun place where it's OK to say CUNT.

 

 

http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/difficulties/whoswhose.html

 

ML

[whipped guy]

RE: Fucking stupid!

 

If I'm Little Ricky, do I have to start taking drum lessons? And won't Fred and Ethel mind the noise?

 

Not when you have this guy on your side... and while I am at it this is why "Little Ricky" was able to grow up to be the "Smart Ass"...

 

http://supermantv.net/superman/george_reeves/little-ricky.jpg

 

Rick... you were indeed cute as a kid...

[RockHard]

RE: Fucking done.

 

"I would never describe DelawareMan as either dumb or a hick."

 

I didn't. The words are his. I pulled the quote from another thread. That's how he described himself, more than once. Self-esteem issues, anyone?

 

Calling DM a hunk may put a few coins in your pocket but it doesn't excuse a lack of civilized manners. In spite of my spiteful glee, I'm not happy that I stooped to his low-life level by calling him a cunt in response to his calling me a "pencil dick." Such bullshit is for sissies. This is what's wrong with this board. There's no one at the top who cares to kick some of these angry sissies in the balls.

 

It is what is it is and my fun is done here. Thank you to those who welcomed me back.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Fucking done.

 

Well, bye-bye, Rock Hard. It was so nice to have you drop by for awhile, but I had forgotten how you could clear a room. Come back again sometime.

[Guest Delaware Man]

RE: Fucking stupid!

 

Regardless, whether you were reference was to Mr. Munroe's penis size or his interest in vintage television, calling Mr. Munroe, "Little Ricky" was pejorative.

I am happy if you calling me a "Cunt" brought you pleasure as it appears your many material blessing you claim to have do not.