Why are there so many tops only?

[Bargara Leatherboy]

It’s interesting , one of the things I love a provider to do, but often they decline is to blow their load over me.

As a sub I always leave

Feeling slightly inadequate as I was not able to get my top to climax

[+ ITakeItDeep]

What actually happens is they profess to be a top and if you have a big dick, once you get them home they suddenly start hinting that they would "like to try bottoming"... So aggravating!

[phx3rings]

The preparation time for a top is the time it takes to swallow a pill.

The preparation time for a bottom (especially the Helden-Bottom...) is longer, so

Bottom line...billable hours etc.

His milage may vary...HMMV

I was thinking the same thing, Jeezifonly. Personally I prefer catching rather than pitching, but that requires a time commitment for preparation, as you mentioned. Since many service providers need to be 'ready-to-go' on short notice, I'd think it would require they maintain a 'clean' lifestyle on a continuing basis. That would be quite a commitment. Just my 2 cents...

[sbguy]

This x 100. I have a steady regular provider and nothing gets me off more than getting him off. I may be the client, but there’s no reason our sessions can’t be mutually pleasurable.

I couldn't agree more. It gives me great pleasure knowing my top man is feeling good, enjoying himself, and getting pleasure from our time together. Nothing gets me off more than when my top man climaxes while fucking me. When that happens, I am over the moon.

 

It's one of the reasons why I typically avoid hiring straight escorts or ones whose orientation profile says "Ask Me". From my personal experience when it's painfully obvious that the escort is straight and is *really* not into sex with guys, it's just an incredibly unpleasant and awkward situation.

Edited October 27, 2020 by sbguy

[+ Pensant]

I find plenty of bottoms on rm. What find is that the guys I stumble across who I want to fuck the most on the site are tops. ?

 

I will say I have had some success with professed tops willing to bottom but that’s after cultivating relationship of trust. However, I don’t chase after the ones listed as tops anymore. If they list as top, I don’t inquire if they are willing to bottom. Now if they change there position listing I’d go for.

I’ve had great luck turning bottoms into tops. It’s a particular talent!

[+ Pensant]

Nah, I don't think so. In my experience Tops are Tops, Top/Vers are Versatiles, and Versatiles are Bottoms.

A different thing is when I meet a guy and he tells me he's Top but he's feminine. That's a no-no.

Oooh! A feminine top. I indulge in that occasionally!

[orville]

Oooh! A feminine top. I indulge in that occasionally!

Lol. I know right? Diversity is real, but a feminine top is a turn off for me. I like my tops masculine. ?

[hungry4darkmeat]

Well the main reason is because of the age old paradigm - supply and demand. straight men pay for pussy and gay men pay for dick, because there are far fewer legit tops than either vers or bottoms. Get that so-called top high and see how quickly his legs are up in the air lol.

 

Plus add the masculinity factor- we perceive straight guys and those who strictly top as being "real men" as opposed to those who become bitches behind closed doors