Rentmen technicality

[Rick M]

I did not realize until this week that reviews cannot be submitted to rent.men unless there is evidence of recent communication... Either an email or (I suppose) a glance at contact info. Although I had done so for this one provider in the past, and I used the site to confirm travel dates, those actions are not sufficient. I shall endeavor to jump through all hoops properly in the future.

[big dale]

Not sure why you'd bother though. Unless the review is excellent and the provider decides to keep it, there's no guarantee it ever gets or stays posted. Better to expend the energy writing a review on Daddy's.

[+ azdr0710]

RM's credibility re: reviews is so thoroughly destroyed that I wouldn't sweat jumping thru their hoops. Though most clients only know RM and have never heard of daddysreviews or this forum, I'd concentrate on these two.

[+ Keith30309]

The enforcement of this seems to ebb and flow. A review I submitted a couple of weeks ago was rejected because I had emailed him but we switched to text and he never emailed me back. In the past I’ve had reviews accepted when there were no emails at all.

[coriolis888]

 

The enforcement of this seems to ebb and flow.

 

snip

 

In the past, I’ve had reviews accepted when there were no emails at all.

 

 

Same with me.

 

Never had a review rejected at rm.

[+ DrownedBoy]

Until a year or so ago, in my experience, the rule seemed to be to reject only bad reviews (on those technicalities) while accepting all good ones. Then the technicalities took over the good ones too.

 

Remember it's the providers who pay RM...

[rvwnsd]

I submitted a positive review for a guy I hired from RM and it was rejected because (they said) there was no evidence of contact through RM. Never mind that we did, in fact, make contact through RM. I mentioned it to him and he told me not to sweat it because no one believes those reviews anyway.

[coriolis888]

I submitted a positive review for a guy I hired from RM and it was rejected because (they said) there was no evidence of contact through RM. Never mind that we did, in fact, make contact through RM.

 

I mentioned it to him and he told me not to sweat it because no one believes those reviews anyway.

 

 

 

When he said no one, he may have said that because rentmen does not include the reviewer's narrative in the review.

 

However, if you use a VPN and the escort has a lot of reviews with comments, readers somewhat believe the narratives if there is a pattern of behavior on the part of the escort.

 

Most who look at rentment see only the checkmarks and yes and no - which mean very little.

 

Then, I agree, a bunch of positive checkmarks are not very meaningful.

[+ StLouisOct]

Not a problem! I usually don’t contact escorts through RM, but they like to receive reviews and I like giving them. So, I tell the escort to be on the lookout for my post-session email via RM email saying ‘hi.’ He emails back a ‘hi.’ Then I submit my review to RM for the benefit of those who have the wisdom to consider RM reviews with other resources, including Daddy’s Reviews (where I also send a review), and this ever-helpful site.

[rvwnsd]

When he said no one, he may have said that because rentmen does not include the reviewer's narrative in the review...

No, he meant that no one believes them, as in the overwhelming majority of Forum members do not believe the reviews regardless whether they see the comments.