ROMANI & IVYLEAGUE ESCORT

[instudiocity]

.

For those of you who feel this is unreasonable, put yourself in my shoes. Now imagine that everyone you know found out about your naughty little secret. Exposing my identity is a risk, and the fee is insurance. If you don't want to pay the premium, you may either take a leap of faith, or hire another provider.

Think, not feel. Same reason I don’t hire torso-only ads.

 

Blurring your face 20% allows only those you know to find out about you.

 

Charging me a fee is not insurance I will not pass along your unblurred photos. Some might construe a fee as ownership if not just licensed use.

 

Hiring a professional provider who doesn’t need to hide is my goal.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Hiring a professional provider who doesn’t need to hide is my goal.

 

[MEDIA=giphy]2kNyLY42v4rxjBoDJW[/MEDIA]

[IndyGuy]

Perhaps I've overlooked something … but starting a thread on a particular person and/or subject is made, at least in part, for the purpose of soliciting comments. My comment was that I did not find either one attractive. That is just my opinion. I agree w/ "down to business" that I'd rather have average to good sex to someone I'm insanely attracted to than mind blowing sex with someone that I'm not attracted to at all. To each his own, but the thought of having sex with someone that you're not attracted to seems pointless to me.

[jjkrkwood]

Perhaps I've overlooked something … but starting a thread on a particular person and/or subject is made, at least in part, for the purpose of soliciting comments. My comment was that I did not find either one attractive. That is just my opinion. I agree w/ "down to business" that I'd rather have average to good sex to someone I'm insanely attracted to than mind blowing sex with someone that I'm not attracted to at all. To each his own, but the thought of having sex with someone that you're not attracted to seems pointless to me.

 

I cant know if I am attracted UNLESS I see the entire person, face, genitals etc.... And there are too many escorts available that are willing to SHOW themselves that I will NOT pay a fee for the "privilege" of a sneak peak before I buy... I would not pay $300+ for ANYTHING that wasn't fully presented to me. I just think "some" escorts have overly inflated egos, and just because there are some people that engage you and pay your fee under YOUR guidelines, doesn't mean everyone will.... If you are willing to operate in a limited, exclusive market, the Very Best of Luck ! .

[sexymonk]

I think the current pics of Romani gives a well perspective as to how he looks. Even peterhung has no pic but has big followers and potential client pool despite of having no face pics! 99% will agree here that peterhung is one of the hottest man here. Does he require to share his pic to cater some people? Absolutely not and loosing those 2-3 people won't be a big deal to him given his awesome reputation here! Ok back to Romani, When meeting him I needed a perspective to know if I am into him or not! His pic in current state were good enough to help in my decision and I found him attractive. Usually, here I don't find 99% men attractive! I am very selective as I not only like good sex but good attractive facial and body features!

[+ Gar1eth]

I think the current pics of Romani gives a well perspective as to how he looks. Even peterhung has no pic but has big followers and potential client pool despite of having no face pics! 99% will agree here that peterhung is one of the hottest man here. Does he require to share his pic to cater some people? Absolutely not and loosing those 2-3 people won't be a big deal to him given his awesome reputation here! Ok back to Romani, When meeting him I needed a perspective to know if I am into him or not! His pic in current state were good enough to help in my decision and I found him attractive. Usually, here I don't find 99% men attractive! I am very selective as I not only like good sex but good attractive facial and body features!

 

 

Ahh but Peter used to show his face. If he hadn't, I never would have been interested in him. We aren't just a few. There are many people who won't hire a headless escort, and considering how many are out there who do show their face, we won't even bother asking for pictures of escorts who don't.

 

Gman

[sexymonk]

Ahh but Peter used to show his face. If he hadn't, I never would have been interested in him. We aren't just a few. There are many people who won't hire a headless escort, and considering how many are out there who do show their face, we won't even bother asking for pictures of escorts who don't.

 

Gman

So Romani used to show his face too! I don't think that Romani is headless! He has just blurred 20% and still face is quite visible! Nonetheless, peter has no face today and many new people are interested in him! I agree to you for completely headless pic but not for pic of Romani!

[MidwestCoastal]

Now I will fully admit we are not always looking for the same thing and one man's trash is another man's treasure. I also don't think it serves a point to diss a service provider who one has no intention of hiring on their looks in a thread about them. Still, for me, in an escort experience-- I would much rather have average to good sex with someone I am insanely attracted to, rather than mind blowing sex with someone I am not attracted to at all. Again- we all have different wants, needs, desires and attractions so I totally understand this is not what you are looking for and that both of us are ok for the different things we want.

 

So your attraction is limited to looks? Interesting.... Maybe this is why I can't jack off to photos of hot guys? Guess some of us need more stimulation beyond visual. Not a judgement, just think its so sad that attraction only equals what you can see.

[Skip]

I am pretty sure Peter's face is not what earned him his reputation. ROMANI appears to have it all in the looks department.

[down_to_business]

So your attraction is limited to looks? Interesting.... Maybe this is why I can't jack off to photos of hot guys? Guess some of us need more stimulation beyond visual. Not a judgement, just think its so sad that attraction only equals what you can see.

 

It's a little more complex than that, but I will accept it. The initial attraction gets me in the door, a whole lot more comes into play as to whether or not the door stays open. I can find attraction based on other things besides looks, but I am very slow to open up and be able to get that point. That type of connection (built over say a 30 day period) definitely isn't going to happen at $200+ an hour. That would be like asking jjkrkwood to hire somebody with an average penis 100 times and use a penis pump on him until he finally got to the size he was hoping for

[MscleLovr]

So your attraction is limited to looks? Interesting....

 

Not at all so @MidwestCoastal. I know many male (fashion and fitness) models for whom looks are everything.

 

I can understand when you say you can’t “jack off to photos of hot guys” - goodlookers in the flesh are always better - but I’m with @down_to_business in that looks get me intrigued/interested at first, but then I need more of a connection to fall in lust and then in love.

[MidwestCoastal]

Well I guess we should all be thankful that most of our 'escort partners' can look beyond what looks they may find attractive and still manage to find enough chemistry to perform or maybe they find chemistry beyond looks.

 

Seems like a heavy dose of irony there, no?

[Epigonos]

Damn guys, this thread is certainly full of a multitude of over simplifications. I’m going to address some of them realizing that I am stating only my opinion.

 

I seriously doubt that many of us, who hire escorts, hire guys who we find physically unattractive.

Now what defines attractive is so broad that it is impossible to define. To name just a few facial types: pretty boys, boys next door, tough boys, etc., etc. Body types are equally diverse: twinks, bodybuilders, gymnasts, toned, etc., etc.

If a client depends solely on the text of an escort’s ad he is certainly being very trusting.

If a client depends solely on reviews on this site he is trusting that the escort will react to him just as he did to the reviewer – again very trusting. I, for example, am 78 and an escort might react very differently to me that he might to a 40 year old.

 

Yes chemistry is important BUT that comes during a first encounter. I find it impossible to believe that chemistry is something that can be discerned (by an ad or a telephone conversation) prior to a first get together.

 

As far as I’m concerned “looks” is what brings an escort into my bed the "FIRST" time. Chemistry is what keeps him coming back to my bed.

Edited July 29, 2019 by Epigonos

[+ goosh69]

Sorry to nitpick, but the alleged line was:

 

'You should never say bad things about the dead, only good… Joan Crawford is dead. Good.'

Yes, Queen, I was OBVIOUSLY paraphrasing as part of a joke. The escort is not dead, for example. And it was an on the record quote to an AP reporter. No allegation. FACT.

[KrisParr]

Previously, Romani advertised under a different name and had in-focus pics to share, both of his face, torso and other accoutrements. It was his chiseled face, overall physique and earthiness that lured me. And I’ll admit, the accompanying ad text was equally inviting. When we met, he gently opened the door just a crack and peered out. And then he let me in, whereupon this Greek god in the flesh au naturel, caused me to utter something like “holy shit” - this is gonna be fun. Re: Peter Hung, yes, indeed he is amazing, but I only hired him based on his reviews - and it was a crap shoot at that, because at the time, his few photos were really awful. So Romani is promising some new shots - patience is a virtue, I’ve been told

[+ Gar1eth]

So your attraction is limited to looks? Interesting.... Maybe this is why I can't jack off to photos of hot guys? Guess some of us need more stimulation beyond visual. Not a judgement, just think its so sad that attraction only equals what you can see.

 

My attraction is not limited to looks. But I very rarely even look at an ad for someone I'm not attracted to facially.

 

Well I guess we should all be thankful that most of our 'escort partners' can look beyond what looks they may find attractive and still manage to find enough chemistry to perform or maybe they find chemistry beyond looks.

 

Seems like a heavy dose of irony there, no?

 

I'd say it's not irony as I'm not an escort. For escorts it's a main job requirement. Even if I were in good shape and handsome-but otherwise the same-I could never be an escort. Escorts are special in that hopefully they can look beyond a face/fat body-or at least act on the surface as if they have.

 

Gman

[+ Gar1eth]

Previously, Romani advertised under a different name and had in-focus pics to share, both of his face, torso and other accoutrements. It was his chiseled face, overall physique and earthiness that lured me. And I’ll admit, the accompanying ad text was equally inviting. When we met, he gently opened the door just a crack and peered out. And then he let me in, whereupon this Greek god in the flesh au naturel, caused me to utter something like “holy shit” - this is gonna be fun. Re: Peter Hung, yes, indeed he is amazing, but I only hired him based on his reviews - and it was a crap shoot at that, because at the time, his few photos were really awful. So Romani is promising some new shots - patience is a virtue, I’ve been told

 

 

But the new shots will be headless.

 

Gman

[KrisParr]

But the new shots will be headless.

 

Gman

 

Gee willikers, I hope not!

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Yes, Queen, I was OBVIOUSLY paraphrasing as part of a joke. The escort is not dead, for example. And it was an on the record quote to an AP reporter. No allegation. FACT.

 

Umm, okay. Clearly I hit a nerve.

 

You don't have to get so serious about it and call guys 'queen'

 

That's just homosexual histronics.

[+ Gar1eth]

Previously, Romani advertised under a different name and had in-focus pics to share, both of his face, torso and other accoutrements. It was his chiseled face, overall physique and earthiness that lured me. And I’ll admit, the accompanying ad text was equally inviting. When we met, he gently opened the door just a crack and peered out. And then he let me in, whereupon this Greek god in the flesh au naturel, caused me to utter something like “holy shit” - this is gonna be fun. Re: Peter Hung, yes, indeed he is amazing, but I only hired him based on his reviews - and it was a crap shoot at that, because at the time, his few photos were really awful. So Romani is promising some new shots - patience is a virtue, I’ve been told

But the new shots will be headless.

 

Gman

Gee willikers, I hope not!

 

@Romani said they'd be headless unless you paid to see them.

 

Gman

[KrisParr]

@Romani said they'd be headless unless you paid to see them.

 

Gman

 

Hmmm, you’re right. Now where did I put that piggy bank ....

[BgMstr4u]

For those of you who feel this is unreasonable, put yourself in my shoes. Now imagine that everyone you know found out about your naughty little secret. Exposing my identity is a risk, and the fee is insurance. If you don't want to pay the premium, you may either take a leap of faith, or hire another provider

 

I understand and sympathize completely. But don’t you think at this point that that particular horse is already out of the barn, so to speak?

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

I understand and sympathize completely. But don’t you think at this point that that particular horse is already out of the barn, so to speak?

 

[robberbaron4u]

@Romani said they'd be headless unless you paid to see them.

 

Gman

In my recollection, Jaime Lee, the celebrated "East Coast Boy", tried the "pay to view" venue with his "pictures", and, the venue was not financially successful. In the end, he posted his portfolio in its entirety in his promotional literature without charge.

[+ newatthis]

...I find it impossible to believe that chemistry is something that can be discerned (by an ad or a telephone conversation) prior to a first get together....

Lack of chemistry (or at least a high percentage chance of lack of chemistry) can often be picked up in a phone conversation.