honcho

Or that the third named instrument is female ...

If you already knew them to have been his clients, for example, by comment made in the Forum, that would be one thing - but if he volunteered that information without being asked, I would have been very uncomfortable hearing it.

This one has the little man jumping out of his chair (with applause )

Don't most (public) universities, offer free flu shots? They're likely not really free, but funded out of the student health fee. I think I mentioned having gone back to grad school in music this academic year and last, and the student health service at Sacramento State University is colocated in the Gym, and they did offer "free" flu shots . . . . < grin >

I greatly (and puriently) enjoyed the photos, although I could have done without the commentary. And they were posted in the Fetish Forum, which the proper place for them.

If you look at musicians and actors, both do it for a very long time (and invest considerable time in study, training and practice), because they are driven to do it. Most individuals in each group hope eventually to make a significant portion of their income from it. However, stasticially, less than 50% of each group is able to do that. I think there are a greater of fraction whose income is primarily music related - via teaching, etc, than for actors. But I don't think that any of would regard hard working, determined, and aspiring actors as hobbyists before they make the big time. Even among musicians, there is a current prominent pianist, Jon Nakamatsu who made his living teaching *high school german* before winning the Tchaikovsky competition. The IRS has something to say about the phrase "drives monetary benefit from it". If you engage in an actitivity and do not make a profit in >= 3 out of 5 years on a sliding window of reckoning, then the IRS says they will treat your activity as a hobby rather than a business.

Another answer is that some of us enjoy some kinds of pain (or even crave it) when we're aroused. Color me so blessed/cursed ...

I think that MikeBiDude and Gadfly22 have different ideas about what the word "Gay" means. MikeBiDude wasn't explicit about his, but I would probably agree with it; I think he is sincere in his attraction to both men and women.

This one also worthy of crossposting under "Black and White and HOT" ...

I sent docred a PM suggesting that his post could have been made to pass muster just by copying the URL of the picture in question rather than using the "exhibit picture" tool. My guess is several other folks must have also, given the speed with which the post was edited. I think the removed photo is worth citing, and I'll risk Daddy's and docred's annoyance by posting the URL here. It was: http://allensilver.com/images/biggallery/0207lg.jpg

< NERD > If you look at the man on the left you'll see that his head is bobbing and it's too far away from the man on the right's crotch to be because of providing a blow job. I think it is likely because of something happening to the guy on the left's pelvic region. < / NERD >

That truly is something to shed a tear over. And his singing was something to be savored independent of his looks; practically lust inducing in of itself.

I've heard it said that a cousin of my maternal grandfather was an accountant for the Chicago mafia (likely mid 1920's)

and this one under "Blondish" (and bespectacled guys and great arms) -

Both of these could also be filed under "Black and White and Hot", in my (not so) humble estimation . . .

There are some lawyers who are forum members. I don't happen to be among them. Various politicians have gotten in trouble over accepting bribes even though they were fairly cautious about their written communications about soliciting contributions.

Legal issues often don't make sense to us layfolk. It seems to be about the narrowest possible interpretation about words in a statute and whether a compelling argument can be made that those words apply to the circumstance under discussion. I'm sure that if you read the contracts issued by Falcon, Titan et. al, you will describe the compensation as being for acting in a video, not for having sex. What is portrayed by the acting might be illegal (think of a movie about bank-robbers or murders), but that doesn't make the acting itself illegal. Was that OK for playing "straight-man" to an obvious setup question?

I'm having a senior moment right now, and can't remember his ID, but I'm sure the fellow pictured has posted in the forum here a couple of times. He appeared in a nationally broadcast beer commercial with overt m2m implications, and has done a fair amount of print porn (something like "Pete-of-Finland"?). Reputation has it he's a nice guy.

I'm sure this provision did not escape the attention of the Trump adminstration, whose actions seem to maximize businesses profit potential at the expense of consumer protections.

This one could also go in the "Cute Critters" thread This one could also go in the hairy chest thread And this one deserves to also be both in the "even with his shirt on" and "Sexy arms" threads

I believe there is an option to at least have it ask you if you want to update.

All of these guys would be qualified to post under the "How many packs" thread. A couple would be entirely in keeping with the "Hairy Chests" page also. Color me swooned ...

Sorry about that - it was MichaelinWDC - https://chaturbate.com/michaelinwdc/

Dudesnudes.com is free to use, but I also subscribe to Bateworld.com. On dudesnude, you watch 5 cams simultaneously, and the guys on cam tend to be younger and more athletic looking, but on Bateworld, you can watch 10 cams, and the guys there are friendlier and more supportive (at least to me). The disadvantage to Bateworld is that you do have to be a paid member to use the VidChat facility, and the site owner is somewhat heavy handed about discouraging references to "insertive behavior".