SirBillybob

Still doesn’t add up because very explicit text commentaries following the tampered star line are still there. Is it possibly an attempt by a censorship algorithm that falls short of redacting the review text component? Also, I am not ever in the USA myself. Are you suggesting it is occurring for ads in which the provider is located in USA? When I look up USA ads here in Canada the stars are not redacted with the stated red text I described but the example I provided was an ad that had been linked here. Yet when I clear my browser and start fresh looking up that ad through my premium membership the redact text over the stars is still there for that guy.🤷‍♂️

Not highlighted in the article but hundreds of thousands of deaths annually are attributable to syphilis. MSM don’t risk STI in a population vacuum.

About 1 in 20 in 20teens decade, and irreversible consequences of morbidity for tens of thousands of others.

By the by, re: U=U, TASP, etc, HIViral suppression guidelines were revised last year. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/360860/9789240055179-eng.pdf

Lately I’ve noticed, I think only when an ad is linked here, some text over review stars, always red and the same delineation of letters and numbers? Seems to be a repetitive string of ‘ebf3’. Anybody? I redacted the reviewer pseudonym in appended screenshot example.

Sorry dude. I had decided to delete my post on the Bogotá ad that may be different age time frame but same person advertiser photos shortly after writing it because I wasn’t fully up to sleuthing on the chaps represented. For others interested they can look up Hunqz Bogotá location.

For sures. P and CP, not so much PNP.

Very specific. Smex. Odour fetish? A consensual S&M smackin’ around? Paid with AMEX? A combo of the aforementioned?

For Puck’s sake, NickBottom.

I’d need to better master origami before attempting reverse origami. I say give everybody else a hand.

aka Jainorma Rae because we like him we really like him.

Counterintuitively, the more protracted death, like by a thousand cuts, is unsolicited two cents thrown.

Well, cum Boxing Day, just get your prostate punched the fcuk out by a sparring dick for an intense chest nut.

The republic Cyprus the other exception geographically, where Nico can marry the gender-neutral Siya.

The only cumming hands that are free are my own, but it’s usually the right one.

The opening narrative suggests the foregone conclusion of a slipping up. Life. Nobody can say they have never fell before.

The majority of guys I hire seem to be in stable opposite-sex relationships, sometimes with one or more young children. I don’t choose them on that basis but that grounding goes some distance in bypassing the craycrays.

Either way nonstarter.

Parting with cash makes me the parter.

0/10 vicious and cruel means 10/10 the opposite, no?

Yes, deposits where we want, without upsells.

I found Now and XTRA! to be very hit and miss. Grateful when the stripper bars got going, especially the relatively shortlived “Heaven” Sunday nights at Brass Rail about 30 years ago. My god, those men coming in to perform on that one night when female strippers had their night off.

Professionally Instituted Glamour Shots. YMMV.😜

Not sure what happened. You viewed them without having toggled the ‘do not track my views’ option but you returned to simply view the profile? Or you ascertained you were blocked because you attempted to message them through the platform? Surely you can still check out the profile. “When I returned to their profile” means …? You wrote “without even contacting the provider”. Do you mean that you attempted to contact and they had preempted? Whichever way you discovered whatever impediment to the ad occurred I cannot think of anything in it for the advertiser and it implies he’s a just chip off the old block. Doesn’t he still have a list of blockees to manage? That could be a longer list stuck in his dashboard than the breadth of messages subsequently initiated by previous viewers that he may need to sift through, ignore, respond to, or delete. In which case he’s not making his work life particularly easier. Surely the quantity of viewers vastly exceeds messengers.